TORNEY

3 definitions found across Law Mind sources

TORNEYAuthored
The Law Mind • 734 words
Definition
"Torney" does not appear to be a recognized legal term with an established definition in Anglo-American law. The source material supplied under this heading contains entries that are plainly misattributed: the Rapalje & Lawrence excerpt defines categories of contracts (continuing, executed, executory), and the Anderson's excerpt describes an executor's right of retainer — neither of which has any connection to "torney" as a legal concept. The term does not appear in standard legal dictionaries, treatises, or case law as an independent term of art. It is most likely one of the following: 1. A typographical or OCR error for ATTORNEY — the most plausible candidate, given phonetic similarity and the frequency with which historical legal texts were scanned with character-recognition errors that drop or transpose letters. 2. A variant spelling or scribal abbreviation found in a specific manuscript or printed source, potentially for "attorney" or, less likely, "tourney" (a form of trial by combat, obsolete in English law by the late medieval period). 3. A term local to a particular jurisdiction or historical period not captured in the major dictionaries. Because the source material does not support a substantive definition, and because fabricating a legal definition would violate the standards of this dictionary, no definition is supplied here. Researchers encountering this term in a primary source should treat it as a probable transcription artifact and consult the surrounding context to determine the intended term. ---
Common Confusion
TORNEY / ATTORNEY: If this term appears in a historical source or database, it is almost certainly a corrupted form of ATTORNEY. The two terms should not be treated as distinct. See the ATTORNEY entry for the substantive definition. TORNEY / TOURNEY: In the remote possibility the source involves medieval English legal procedure, "tourney" (trial by combat or judicial duel) is a separate and entirely obsolete concept. Context will distinguish the two immediately. ---
Why It Matters in Research
This entry is a research warning, not a research resource. Its value lies in what it signals about corpus integrity. OCR-generated legal databases — including digitized versions of historical reporters, pleading books, and treatises — frequently produce corrupted terms from sources with degraded typefaces, ligatures, long-s characters, or damaged pages. "Torney" almost certainly originates from one of these processes, most likely from "attorney" (with the leading "at-" dropped) or from a manuscript abbreviation. Researchers who encounter "torney" in a Law Mind corpus search result should: 1. Check the surrounding document for context — if the passage concerns agency, representation, or power of attorney, the intended term is almost certainly "attorney." 2. Examine the original source image if available. Digitized legal texts from the 18th and 19th centuries are particularly prone to OCR artifacts involving common prefixes ("at-," "ex-," "in-"). 3. Do not treat a zero-result or thin-result search on "torney" as evidence that the underlying legal concept is absent from the corpus. Search instead under the probable intended term. The misattributed source entries in this record — one on continuing contracts, one on an executor's right of retainer — further suggest a metadata or indexing error in the underlying database, where content from unrelated headwords has been associated with this entry. Researchers should not rely on those passages as defining "torney" and should locate those passages under their correct headwords (see RELATED TERMS below). ---
Historical Dictionary Support
Neither Rapalje & Lawrence nor Anderson's Dictionary of Law contains an entry for "torney" as an independent legal term. The excerpts supplied with this entry belong to other headwords entirely: The Rapalje & Lawrence excerpt — describing continuing contracts and the executed/executory distinction — is characteristic of the dictionary's treatment of CONTRACT and its subdivisions. The Anderson's excerpt — describing an executor's right to reserve assets to satisfy his own debt before other equal-degree creditors — is a definition of the RIGHT OF RETAINER (sometimes called RETAINER), a common-law doctrine of probate and administration law. Neither historical source, nor any other major historical legal dictionary in the standard reference shelf (Black's, Bouvier's, Burrill's, Wharton's), contains "torney" as a defined term. This absence is itself significant: it confirms the term has no independent legal meaning and should be treated as a transcription artifact when encountered. ---
Related Terms
Attorney | Power of Attorney | Retainer (Executor's Right of) | Continuing Contract | Executed Contract | Executory Contract
TORNEYmain
Rapalje & Lawrence • 1888
With reference to their nature, contracts are divisible into the following kinds: 12. A continuing contract is one for the performance of several acts from time to time. Thus, a contract to maintain and repair railway wagons for seven years is a continuing contract. In re Sneezum, Ex parte Davis, 3 Ch. D. 463. 13. Executed and executory.- When a contract has been performed by both parties, it is said to be executed, or when it has been performed by one of the parties, it is executed as far as he is concerned, but so long as something remains to be done by one of the parties, it is said to be "executory" as regards him. (Chit. Cont. 136, 591.) When applied to contracts of sale, "executed" and "executory" have peculiar meanings. See SALE. 14. With reference to their objects, contracts are of innumerable varieties, such as contracts of agency, service, works, insurance, guarantee, contracts of debt, (2 Bl. Com. 465; Sm. Merc. L. 532;) i. e. contracts for the payment in future of money; and contracts of sale, i. e. contracts by which one person agrees to sell, and the other to buy, certain property. (See SALE.) In the case of a sale of goods, the contract is generally restricted to the question of price, quality and time of delivery; but in the case of land, leaseholds, &c., the contract generally contains elaborate provisions (principally in the interest of the vendor) as to the investigation of the title, 11. A personal contract is one which depends upon the existence, or the personal qualities, skill or services of one of the parties, such as a contract of mar-the delivery of the abstract and requisi- * This classification-which, by including 6; Williams v. Jones, 13 Mees. & W. 628. See under the same head "true contracts," "fictitious 43 Geo. III. c. 46, 4; Leake Cont. 92.) contracts" and "contracts of record," puts a con- "Debt," had the technical sense of an obligation siderable strain on the meaning of contractto pay a certain sum of money whether created seems, like many other accepted classifications by contract or not, and in this sense debts are in English law, to be founded on the old rules correctly divided by the old writers into debts of pleading. The action of debt was applicable of record, debts by specialty and debts by simple whenever a certain sum of money was due (F. contract. (2 Bl. Com. 465. See DEBT.) But as N. B. 115g; Steph. Pl. 15), whether by sima debt, in the usual sense of the word, is an obliple contract, specialty or judgment; in the case of a judgment recovered in a personal action, the plaintiff could not at common law issue execulegal writers seem to have considered it necestion on it after a year and day, but was driven sary to classify contracts as if they were the only to bring a new action on the judgment. (Hissource of debts in the technical sense, namely, cocks v. Kemp, 3 Ad. & E. 679; Fost. Sci. Fa. into contracts of record, by specialty and simple. a gation to pay money voluntarily entered into by the debtor, in other words, created by contract,
TORNEYmain
Anderson's Dictionary of Law • 1890
2. At common law, the right in an executor or administrator to reserve assets enough to pay his own debt, before other creditors of equal degree. The reason was, he could not sue himself. Now, as a rule, unsecured debts share alike."

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In