Definition
TOLLS carries two distinct and largely unrelated legal meanings. Context almost always determines which applies, but the gap between them is wide enough to cause serious research errors.
1. Charges for use of public infrastructure or passage. In this sense, tolls are fees imposed by authority — public or private — for the use of roads, bridges, ferries, harbors, markets, or similar facilities. The right to collect tolls was historically a franchise granted by the Crown or sovereign, and the imposition of tolls without such authority was itself legally actionable. This meaning survives robustly in modern law through highway tolling authorities, port fees, and bridge commissions.
2. Suspension of a statute of limitations. In this sense, to "toll" a limitations period means to pause or suspend its running, so that the time during which tolling operates is not counted against the plaintiff. The noun form — "tolls" — appears when multiple tolling events or doctrines are at issue simultaneously. Tolling can arise by statute (as when a defendant is absent from the jurisdiction, or a plaintiff is under a legal disability) or by equitable doctrine (as in fraudulent concealment or class action tolling). This meaning dominates modern civil procedure and is the more frequent research context today.
These two meanings share no common origin in application, though both involve something being held in suspension or exaction — one literally, one metaphorically.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Plural of "toll" — fees charged for use of a road, bridge, or similar facility; also the plural of the verb meaning to ring a bell slowly.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Toll: A tax paid for some liberty or privilege, particularly for the privilege of passing over a bridge or on a highway, or for that of vending goods in a fair, market, or the like.
The common meaning maps cleanly onto legal meaning (1) above — charges for passage or market privilege. But the common language gives no purchase whatsoever on legal meaning (2), the suspension of limitations periods. A researcher encountering "tolls" in a civil procedure context and importing the common meaning will be entirely misled.
---
Common Confusion
The two primary meanings of TOLLS — infrastructure charges and limitations suspension — are not confused with each other in practice because context is usually dispositive. The more common confusion is between TOLLING and related procedural terms:
TOLLING vs. WAIVER: Tolling suspends a deadline; waiver relinquishes a right. A defendant who waives a limitations defense does not toll the statute — the defense is simply abandoned.
TOLLING vs. ACCRUAL: The limitations clock does not begin running until a cause of action accrues. Tolling presupposes accrual has already occurred and then pauses the running clock. Conflating accrual disputes with tolling arguments is a recurring error in research.
TOLL (infrastructure) vs. TAX/DUTY/IMPOST: The historical sources treat tolls as a species within a broader taxonomy of public impositions. A toll is typically tied to a specific use or passage; a tax is general revenue. This distinction mattered enormously in constitutional and regulatory history and resurfaces in dormant Commerce Clause litigation.
---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES
Under the limitations-suspension meaning, courts and statutes recognize several distinct tolling categories:
Statutory tolling: Express legislative suspension — e.g., for minority, mental incapacity, or defendant's absence from the jurisdiction.
Equitable tolling: Court-imposed suspension where rigid application of the limitations period would be unjust, typically because the plaintiff could not have known of the claim through reasonable diligence.
Fraudulent concealment tolling: A subspecies of equitable tolling triggered by a defendant's active concealment of the claim or injury.
Class action tolling: Suspension of individual class members' claims during the pendency of a putative class action. Derives from American Pipe & Construction Co. v. Utah (a real and well-established doctrine).
Under the infrastructure-charge meaning, historical law recognized toll thorough (passage along a road), toll traverse (crossing private land), toll pontage (bridge crossing), and stallage or piccage (market privileges) — terms largely obsolete but occasionally encountered in title research and franchise history.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers face two distinct hazard zones depending on which meaning is at issue.
For the infrastructure/charges meaning: The historical sources — Black's and Bouvier's alike — define tolls almost entirely through the trade and customs lens, emphasizing import/export impositions. This reflects the commercial law preoccupations of the 19th century. Modern toll law has shifted heavily toward transportation infrastructure and is governed by a combination of state enabling statutes, federal highway law, and constitutional commerce analysis. Do not expect historical dictionary entries to map onto modern highway toll authority disputes.
For the limitations-suspension meaning: The historical dictionaries are nearly silent on this usage. Neither Black's (1st or 2nd ed.) nor Bouvier's addresses tolling of statutes of limitations under the heading TOLLS, though the doctrine itself was well established at common law. Researchers relying solely on dictionary sources for limitations tolling will miss the substantive law entirely. The procedural doctrine lives in treatises, case law, and statutory annotations — not in these lexicographic sources.
Cross-corpus navigation tip: If your research involves tolling of limitations periods in federal court, the equitable tolling doctrine and the class action tolling rule operate under different standards and have distinct bodies of case law. The Law Mind Civil Procedure encyclopedia entry (civpro_132) addresses these as separate frameworks. If your research involves adverse possession and disability statutes, the tolling rules in property law have their own specialized contours — see property_89.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
All three source dictionaries — Black's (1st ed.), Black's (2nd ed.), and Bouvier's — offer functionally identical definitions, all drawn from Coke's Second Institutes (Co. 2 Inst. 58). The definition is: any manner of customs, subsidy, prestation, imposition, or sum of money demanded for exporting or importing of any wares or merchandise, to be taken of the buyer.
This uniformity signals that none of the three dictionaries independently analyzed the term — they reproduce Coke's formulation as authoritative. The practical consequence is that all three share the same limitation: the definition is anchored in 17th-century trade law and does not address the limitations-tolling meaning at all, nor does it reflect the full range of toll types (road, bridge, ferry, market) that appeared in 19th-century American case law.
What the historical sources do usefully convey: tolls were understood as a form of sovereign imposition, distinguishable from taxes by their connection to a specific privilege or use. The reference to "prestation" — a feudal term for a payment or service owed — places tolls within a framework of obligatory contributions to public authority, not merely voluntary market prices. This framing matters when researching the constitutional authority of toll-collecting entities and whether a particular charge is a legitimate franchise fee or an unlawful tax.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Infrastructure toll authority varies substantially by state. Some states vest toll powers exclusively in state agencies; others authorize regional authorities, municipalities, or private concessionaires. Whether a toll is characterized as a user fee or a tax can affect constitutional challenges under both federal and state law. For limitations tolling, federal courts apply federal tolling doctrine to federal claims but look to state law tolling rules when borrowing state limitations periods for federal causes of action — a distinction with significant practical consequences in diversity and hybrid litigation.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
civpro_132: Tolling Doctrines — Equitable Tolling, Fraudulent Concealment, and Class Action Tolling (The Law Mind Civil Procedure & Evidence Encyclopedia)
property_89: Adverse Possession — Disability Statutes (Tolling) (The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia)
---