Definition
A formal procedural right, recognized in both civil and criminal practice, by which a court, jury, or other authorized party is permitted to go to a physical location and inspect a place, object, or property that is relevant to the matter before the tribunal. The inspection occurs outside the courtroom and is conducted as part of the adjudicative process, typically under judicial supervision.
The term operates in at least two distinct legal contexts:
1. JURY VIEW (civil and criminal): The right of a jury — and sometimes the judge — to inspect a premises, scene, or physical object that cannot practically be brought into the courtroom. A view is ordered at the discretion of the court when firsthand inspection of the locus is reasonably necessary to enable the jury to understand and evaluate the evidence. The jury does not take testimony during a view, and the view itself may or may not constitute "evidence" depending on the jurisdiction.
2. PROPERTY LAW (easements and nuisance): A landowner's right to an unobstructed line of sight across neighboring property. An easement of view — sometimes called a right of prospect — protects a dominant tenement's access to a vista or scenic outlook. Unlike easements of light and air, easements of view are not universally recognized and are treated with particular caution in common-law jurisdictions.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): "View" means the ability to see something, or the thing seen; a visual perspective or scene.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "View" is defined as the act of seeing or examining; sight; prospect; the range of vision; also, that which is seen.
The gap between the common and legal meaning is procedural and formal. In ordinary usage, "to view" is merely to look at something. In legal usage, "to view" designates a court-sanctioned, supervised act with defined procedural consequences — it is a term of art for an authorized inspection carrying legal significance within an ongoing proceeding or establishing a cognizable property right.
---
Common Confusion
A jury view should not be confused with a site inspection conducted by a party's expert or investigator outside of judicial supervision. The jury view is a formal proceeding, typically requiring a court order, the presence of counsel, and often the judge. Unauthorized contact between jurors and the scene during deliberations is a separate matter raising misconduct concerns.
In property law, the right of view (as an easement) is frequently conflated with easements of light and air. They are distinct: light and air easements protect the passage of natural illumination and ventilation; view easements protect a specific sightline or prospect. The legal treatment and historical recognition of these rights differ substantially.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working in trial procedure will encounter "to view" primarily in discussions of jury management, evidence, and constitutional rights in criminal matters. The central unresolved question in older materials is whether what a jury perceives during a view constitutes "evidence" or merely an aid to understanding admitted evidence — a distinction with direct implications for sufficiency review on appeal. Modern practice has generally resolved this in favor of treating the view as evidence, but historical sources reflect genuine disagreement, and jurisdiction-specific rules vary. Researchers should not assume uniformity across state practice.
In criminal law, the connection to the plain view doctrine is conceptual rather than procedural: plain view in Fourth Amendment jurisprudence concerns what law enforcement may observe without a warrant, not the formal jury view procedure. These are distinct legal constructs that share vocabulary but operate in entirely different frameworks. Conflating them when navigating the corpus will produce misleading results.
In property research, the paucity of recognized view easements in American common law means that early treatise discussions often borrow heavily from English authorities, where the "right of prospect" was discussed but similarly disfavored. Researchers should flag that American courts historically refused to imply easements of view absent express grant, making historical materials that assume English doctrine unreliable as guides to American outcomes.
The Rapalje & Lawrence entry offers no useful content for this term — the relevant entry appears to have been corrupted or mis-indexed in the source material, pulling text from adjacent unrelated entries (transportation, total loss, merchandise). Researchers should treat Rapalje & Lawrence as unavailable for this term and rely on procedural treatises and encyclopedia synthesis instead.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The Rapalje & Lawrence source material for this term is non-functional — the indexed entry returns text from adjacent entries (total loss, transportation, commerce) rather than any definition of "to view." This is a known artifact of early legal dictionary typography, where running-head entries and column-adjacent text occasionally migrate across entries in digitization. No substantive content from Rapalje & Lawrence is available for this term.
Historically, Bouvier's Law Dictionary (multiple editions) addressed jury views under the heading "View" as a recognized procedural mechanism traceable to English practice, noting the right of the jury to be conducted to the premises in actions involving real property disputes. Early American practice inherited the jury view from English common law, where it was well-established in real actions as a necessary aid to a jury that could not otherwise understand metes and bounds descriptions of land. As American practice moved away from formal real actions, the jury view expanded to personal injury and criminal matters while shedding some of its earlier formality.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Whether a jury view constitutes substantive evidence — rather than merely an aid to understanding other evidence — varies by jurisdiction and affects appellate review standards. Some states treat the view as part of the evidentiary record; others treat it as illustrative only. In property law, easements of view receive express recognition in some western states with significant scenic land values but remain disfavored as implied easements across most common-law jurisdictions.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Warrantless Searches — Plain View Doctrine (The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia) [conceptual connection; distinct doctrine]
Easements — Easements of Light, Air, and View (The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia)
---