Definition
"The civil law" carries three distinct meanings in legal usage, and confusing them is one of the more persistent traps in legal research. Context almost always controls which meaning applies, but historical sources often use the phrase without signaling which sense is intended.
1. The Roman law tradition. In its broadest and most historically significant sense, "the civil law" refers to the body of law derived from Roman law — the Corpus Juris Civilis of Justinian and the European scholarly tradition built upon it. This is the sense in which civilians, civil law jurisdictions, and civil law countries (as distinguished from common law countries) use the phrase. Louisiana, Quebec, and most of continental Europe, Latin America, and parts of Asia operate within this tradition.
2. Private law as distinguished from criminal law. In its most familiar modern usage, "civil law" (usually without the definite article) refers to the body of law governing disputes between private parties — contract, tort, property, family, and related areas — as opposed to criminal law, which involves the state prosecuting individuals for offenses against public order. This distinction shapes procedure, burdens of proof, remedies, and forum.
3. The civil action to recover property. Bouvier's records the narrowest historical usage: a civil law action brought by a person seeking to recover property held by another. This was a specific category of action under Roman and early common law classification, brought against the possessor. It corresponds roughly to what later common law called a real action or the actio in rem of the civil law tradition.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): "Civil law" in ordinary speech most often contrasts with criminal law — the law dealing with disputes between individuals rather than crimes against the state. It can also refer loosely to any legal system derived from Roman law.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Webster's 1913 defines "civil law" as "(1) the system of jurisprudence elaborated by the Romans, embodying the principles of justice as applied to the rights and interests of individuals; (2) the municipal or local law, as distinguished from international law; (3) the law of rights as between individuals, as distinguished from criminal law."
The gap between common and legal meaning here is not a simple divergence but a collision of multiple meanings. A lay reader hearing "civil law" will likely understand only the criminal/civil distinction. A legal historian reading "the civil law" in an 18th-century treatise may find the Roman law tradition is meant. A researcher in Bouvier may find a still narrower procedural sense. The definite article — "the civil law" versus "civil law" — is a weak but real signal that the Roman law tradition or a formal classification is being invoked.
---
Common Confusion
The phrase "the civil law" is routinely conflated with "civil law" in the sense of non-criminal law, and both are sometimes confused with "civil procedure." These are distinct. The civil law as a legal tradition is a complete jurisprudential system with its own doctrines, sources, and methodology. Civil law as opposed to criminal law is a division within any legal system, including common law systems. Civil procedure is the body of rules governing how civil litigation is conducted, which exists in both traditions.
Additionally, "municipal law" — meaning the internal law of a state as opposed to international law — was historically treated as synonymous with "civil law" in some sources. Researchers encountering this usage in older texts should not read "civil law" as limited to non-criminal private law.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The phrase "the civil law" is a navigational hazard throughout the Law Mind corpus precisely because it is so common and so consistently under-defined. Several practical points:
First, when Bouvier and other historical dictionaries use "the civil law" with the definite article and cite to the Digest (Dig. 50.16.16, as here), they are invoking Roman law directly. Bouvier's entry is not defining the modern civil/criminal distinction — it is explaining a Roman-derived classification of actions. Researchers should not read this backward into modern American procedural categories.
Second, the civil/criminal distinction matters acutely in several Law Mind Encyclopedia contexts. Civil forfeiture, for example, is formally a civil proceeding but carries punitive consequences that blur the line. Family court contempt can be either civil or criminal depending on the court's purpose. Civil tax fraud penalties are civil in form but often litigated alongside criminal referrals. In each of these areas, which "civil law" means matters for procedure, burden of proof, and constitutional protections.
Third, Louisiana researchers face a compounded difficulty: Louisiana operates under a civil law tradition (Roman law-derived), but also distinguishes civil from criminal law in the ordinary modern sense. Historical Louisiana sources may use "the civil law" to mean the civilian tradition while a modern Louisiana practitioner uses the same phrase to mean non-criminal law.
Fourth, the Digest citation in Bouvier (Dig. 50.16.16) is a real text — De Verborum Significatione, a definitional title within Justinian's Digest. Its presence signals that Bouvier is synthesizing Roman sources directly, not just American common law doctrine.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier's entry for "the civil law" is conspicuously narrow: it defines a specific type of action — the possessory or vindicatory action to recover property from another — and cites the Digest. This entry does not attempt to define "civil law" as a legal tradition or as the opposite of criminal law. Researchers relying on Bouvier alone would miss both of those meanings entirely.
This reflects a broader pattern in early American legal dictionaries: they often defined Roman-derived terms by reference to their Roman procedural contexts, without pausing to explain that the phrase carried a much larger meaning as the name for an entire jurisprudential tradition. Bouvier was writing for practitioners who were assumed to know what the civil law tradition was. Modern researchers should not mistake Bouvier's silence on the broader meaning for an absence of that meaning.
What Bouvier captures well is the action-classification sense: that the "civil law" action was directed against the person in possession and aimed at recovery of the thing itself. This maps onto what common lawyers called the real action and what civilians called the actio in rem or rei vindicatio. The distinction between an action against the person and an action against the thing had procedural consequences that persisted long after the formal abolition of the forms of action.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Louisiana is the primary American jurisdiction where "the civil law" as a legal tradition has operative legal significance: its private law is codified in a civil law tradition derived from French and Spanish law, themselves derived from Roman law. All other U.S. states operate under common law systems, but may apply civil law-derived rules in specific areas, particularly through conflicts-of-law analysis when foreign or Louisiana law governs a dispute.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Civil Forfeiture and Its Intersection with Criminal Law (The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia) — for the civil/criminal distinction in forfeiture proceedings.
Family Law — Contempt in Family Court (Civil vs. Criminal) (The Law Mind Family Law Encyclopedia) — for the procedural and constitutional consequences of the civil/criminal distinction in contempt.
Fraud Penalty Civil (The Law Mind Tax Encyclopedia) — for civil vs. criminal treatment of tax fraud.
---