TEAM

10 definitions found across Law Mind sources

TEAMAuthored
The Law Mind • 1041 words
Definition
In law, "team" carries a narrow, technical meaning largely confined to exemption statutes and highway liability contexts — quite different from the term's modern everyday sense. 1. Exemption law meaning. A team is one or more horses (or other draft animals), together with their harness and the vehicle to which they are customarily attached for use. This unit — animal, harness, and vehicle together — qualifies as a "team" for purposes of debtor exemption statutes that protect a householder's working animals and equipment from execution by creditors. 2. Household use meaning. Bouvier's extends the definition to encompass the animals a householder or head of family uses in the business of providing for the family. This framing emphasizes the functional, domestic-economy rationale behind exemption protection rather than a strict count of animals. 3. Highway liability meaning. In statutes allowing recovery for injuries caused by the condition of a public highway, "team" has been construed broadly enough to include a single horse being driven — not merely a matched pair — expanding the class of claimants who could seek damages. ---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): To form a group for sports or work; to go together well; to convey or haul with a team; to give work to a gang under a subcontractor. As a noun, a group of people working toward a shared goal. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Two or more horses, oxen, or other beasts harnessed to the same vehicle for drawing; also a brood or litter of young animals, especially ducks; a number of animals moving together. The gap matters. The ordinary historical meaning assumed plurality — two or more animals — and Webster's 1913 reflects exactly that. The legal meaning, as courts and Bouvier's clarified, requires no minimum number of animals. A single horse with its harness and attached vehicle constitutes a "team" under exemption statutes. Researchers reading an exemption case or statute that denies or allows a "team" exemption should not assume the dispute involved more than one animal. ---
Common Confusion
The word's ordinary implication of plurality has caused genuine interpretive difficulty in historical sources. Courts in exemption cases had to explicitly address whether a single horse qualified, which is why Bouvier's flags the highway-liability construction. A researcher encountering the term in an 1850s–1900s creditor-debtor dispute should treat the animal count as a live legal question, not a settled factual background. The Anderson's entry in this corpus appears to have been corrupted or misattributed at the source level and does not contain a usable definition of "team"; disregard it for this term. ---
Why It Matters in Research
This term is almost entirely a creature of 19th-century American debtor exemption law and tort law relating to highway conditions. Its practical significance faded as draft animals disappeared from commerce and exemption statutes were modernized to cover motor vehicles and other tools of trade. Researchers should be alert to several issues: First, time-period sensitivity. The legal definition of "team" as a unit of animal, harness, and vehicle was developed in a specific window — roughly 1840s through early 1900s — when agricultural and artisan households depended on draft animals for livelihood. Exemption cases from this era frequently turned on whether the debtor's property constituted a "team" within the statute. Second, the unit problem. Courts treated the team as an indivisible unit. Harness without horse, or horse without vehicle, might not qualify. This has implications for how exemption claims were pleaded and how inventories of seized property were described in court records. Third, highway cases. The broader construction of "team" in highway-damage statutes — extending to a single driven horse — reflects a different legislative purpose (compensating injured travelers) and should not be imported into exemption analysis without care. Fourth, jurisdictional variation in exemption amounts. Exemption statutes differed state by state in the value ceiling placed on a protected team. A "team" might be exempt up to a specified dollar value in one state and fully exempt in another. Corpus materials from different states will reflect these different ceilings without always making the difference explicit. Fifth, no modern analog. Contemporary exemption statutes protect motor vehicles, tools of trade, and similar assets. Researchers mapping historical exemption doctrine onto modern law should treat "team" as a historical category without a direct modern successor, except by analogy. ---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's (1st and 2nd eds.) and Bouvier's are in close agreement on the core definition: one or more animals with harness and vehicle, used as a working unit. Both anchor to the same New York authority (31 N.Y. 655). Bouvier's adds the household-provider framing, which is useful for understanding the social policy behind the exemption — this was not about protecting wealth but about preventing a family from losing the means of earning a livelihood. The highway-liability extension appears in Bouvier's and reflects actual doctrinal work courts had to do when plaintiffs sought damages for injuries sustained while driving a single horse. The Black's entries do not discuss this extension, making Bouvier's the more complete source for the full scope of the term's legal application. The Anderson's entry in the corpus is clearly misallocated source text about tax liens and redemption rights, not a definition of "team." It should be disregarded entirely for this entry; no synthesis with it is possible or appropriate. None of the historical dictionaries address the decline of the term or its supersession by motor vehicle exemption law, which is a gap researchers should fill with primary statutory sources. ---
Jurisdictional Note
The term's legal content derived almost entirely from state exemption statutes, which varied considerably in drafting. New York cases anchor the dictionary definitions, but the specific contours — whether harness alone qualified, whether farm wagons differed from personal carriages, whether a hired team was exempt — were resolved differently across jurisdictions. Researchers working outside New York should locate the controlling state statute and its interpretive case law rather than relying on the dictionary definition as dispositive. ---
Related Terms
Exemption (debtor's exemption) Execution (writ of) Homestead exemption Tools of trade (exemption) Highway liability Draft animals Head of family Personal property exemption
TEAMmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
Within the meaning of an ex- emption law, a "team" consists of either one or two horses, with their harness and the vehicle to which they are customarily at tached for use. 32 Barb. 291; 31 N. Y. 655
TEAMmain
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910
Within the meaning of an exemption law, a “‘team’’ consists of either one or two horses, with their harness and the vehicle to which they are customarily attached for use. Wilcox v. Hawley, 31 N. Y. 655, See MASTER. Assessments .
TEAMmain
Anderson's Dictionary of Law • 1890
vided, is not displaced by a sale under a pre-existing which a statute provides is exclusive. See PROjudgment or decree. It attaches to the res without regard to individual ownership, and, when enforced by sale pursuant to the statute, the purchaser takes an unimpeachable title.¹ The right to redeem land sold for taxes is commonly reserved, and is favored by the policy of the law.2 Immunity from taxation is a personal privilege, not transferable except under express authority of the legislature; and the exemption does not necessarily attach to the property after it passes from the privileged owner.3 Unless exempted in terms which amount to a contract not to tax, the property, privileges and franchises of a corporation are legitimate subjects.4 Exemption of a corporation extends only to the property necessary for its business; otherwise, it could extend its immunity, and escape the common burden of government. An exemption granted an individual is a franchise which may be lost by acquiescence for a period of years. Property of the United States is exempt by the Constitution from taxation by a State." The necessities of government, the nature of the duties to be performed, and usage, have established a procedure in regard to the levy and collection of taxes which differs from proceedings in courts of justice, but which is still "due process of law." When levied by a city, for a public purpose, by authority of law, though some of the property assessed be farm lands, within the city, the State does not deprive the owner of his property without due process. Where the taking of property is in the enforcement of a tax, the proceeding is necessarily less formal than in other cases, and whether notice is necessary may depend on the character of the tax, and the manner in which its amount is determinable. To sustain an action to recover illegal taxes paid, it is necessary: that authority to levy be wholly wanting; that the money was actually received by the defendant; that payment was made under compulsion, to prevent the immediate seizure of his goods or the arrest of his person.10 The remedy 1 Osterberg v. Union Trust Co., 93 U. S. 428 (1876). Barrett v. Holmes, 102 U. S. 657 (1880), cases. Morgan v. Louisiana, 93 U. S. 222-24 (1876), cases; East Tennessee, &c. R. Co. v. County of Hamblen, 102 id. 274 (1880); Wilson v. Gaines, 103 id. 417 (1880); Memphis R. Co. v. Commissioners, 112 id. 617 (1884), cases. • North Missouri R. Co. v. Maguire, 20 Wall. 61 (1873). • Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee, 104 U. S. 496-97 (1881), cases. • Given v. Wright, 117 U. S. 648, 656 (1886). Van Brocklin v. Tennessee, 117 U. S. 153-80 (1886), cases. e Kelly v. Pittsburgh, 104 U. S. TS (1881), Miller, J. • Hagar v. Reclamation District, 111 U. S. 708 (1884); 18 F. R. 449-50 (1883), cases. 10 Dillon, Munic. Corp. § 940; Lamborn v. Commissioners, 97 U. S. 181 (1877); Union Pacific R. Co. v. Commissioners, 98 id. 541 (1878). TEST, 1. Compounds of tax are: tax-assessor, tax-certificate, tax-deed, tax-fund, tax-levy, tax-lien, tax-payer, tax receipt, tax-receiver, tax-sale, qq. v. Other common words are, taxable, non-taxable, taxables, qq. v. See ASSESS, 1; CHARTER, 2; CIRCULATION; COM MERCE; CORPORATION; DISTRICT, 2; DUTY, 2; ESCAPE, 2; FRANCHISE, 1; IMPAIR; IMPORT; IMPOST; INCOME; LEVY, 3 (1); LIST, 2; MANDAMUS; PRIVILEGE, 1; РвоCESS, 1, Due; RATE, 2; SALE; SCHOOL; SCRIP; SECTARIAN; STOCK, 3 (2); SUFFER; TONNAGE; WORSHIP. Within the meaning of an exemption law, one or more horses, with their harness and the vehicle to which they are customarily attached for use. 3 The animals which a householder or the head of a family uses in the business of providing for his family.4 In a statute allowing damages for injury from the condition of a highway, was held to include a horse driven with other horses unharnessed. Referring to turning out on meeting in a highway, may mean a vehicle, with animals drawing it, and used for loads instead of persons. A statute making a railroad company liable in damages for injuring "live-stock running at large" at a place where it should have fenced its track, was held to include a runaway "team," that is, two or more horses, oxen or other beasts, harnessed together to the same vehicle for driving." Team work. In a statute exempting from execution two horses kept and used for team work, means work done by a team as a substantial part of a man's business.& Teamster. One who drives a team; also, one who habitually drives a team, or is engaged in the business of teaming as a means of earning a livelihood. See CARRIER, Common; ROAD, 1, Law of. 1 Snyder v. Marks, 109 U. S. 189, 193 (1883), cases. See generally 18 F. R. 445-55 (1883), cases. 2 Seymour v. Over-River School District, 53 Conn. 509 (1885). On rights as between teacher and pupil, see 25 Cent. Law J. 339 (1887), cases. • Dains v. Prosser, 32 Barb. 291 (1860), cases; Brown v. Davis, 9 Hun, 44 (1876). • Wilcox v. Hawley, 31 N. Y. 653 (1864); 47 Barb. 497. • Elliott v. Lisbon, 57 N. H. 29-30 (1876), cases. • Hotchkiss v. Hoy, 41 Conn. 577 (1874). Inman v. Chicago, &c. R. Co., 60 Iowa, 462 (1883). Hickock v. Thayer, 49 Vt. 375 (1877). • See Brusie v. Griffith, 34 Cal. 306 (1867); Elder Williams, 16 Nev. 419 (1882); Story, Bailm. § 496.
TEAMn.
Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913
A group of young animals, especially of young ducks; a brood; a litter. A team of ducklings about her. Holland. Hence, a number of animals moving together. A long team of snowy swans on high. Dryden. Two or more horses, oxen, or other beasts harnessed to the same vehicle for drawing, as to a coach, wagon, sled, or the like. "A team of dolphins." Spenser. To take his team and till the earth. Piers Plowman. It happened almost every day that coaches stuck fast, until a team of cattle could be procured from some neighboring farm to tug them out of the slough. Macaulay. A number of persons associated together in any work; a gang; especially, a number of persons selected to contend on one side in a match, or a series of matches, in a cricket, football, rowing, etc. A flock of wild ducks. A royalty or privilege granted by royal charter to a lord of a manor, of having, keeping, and judging in his court, his bondmen, neifes, and villains, and their offspring, or suit, that is, goods and chattels, and appurtenances thereto. Burrill.
TEAMv.
Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913
To engage in the occupation of driving a team of horses, cattle, or the like, as in conveying or hauling lumber, goods, etc.; to be a teamster. team up, to form one or more teams, either for a common endeavor, or to compete in a contest.
TEAMv.
Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913
To convey or haul with a team; as, to team lumber. [R.] Thoreau.
teamverb
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
Wiktionary contributorsCC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.
To form a group, as for sports or work. | To go together well; to harmonize. | To convey or haul with a team. | To form together into a team. | To give work to a gang under a subcontractor.
teamintj
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
Wiktionary contributorsCC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.
Used to propose that another player team up with the speaker.
Teamname
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
Wiktionary contributorsCC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.
A river in the Metropolitan Borough of Gateshead, Tyne and Wear, England, which flows into the River Tyne. It has other names further upstream in County Durham.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In