Definition
One who takes or acquires an interest in property. In legal usage, the term most often appears in the law of wills, trusts, and future interests to identify the person who receives an estate by devise, gift, or operation of law.
1. General sense: Any person who acquires property or a legal interest, whether by grant, devise, bequest, or other transfer.
2. First taker: When an estate is granted subject to a remainder or executory devise, the person who receives the immediate possessory interest is called the first taker. The first taker holds the estate during its natural duration, after which the property passes to the remainderman or the beneficiary of the executory devise.
3. Taker in default: In the law of powers of appointment, a taker in default (or taker in default of appointment) is the person designated to receive the appointive property if the holder of the power fails to exercise it.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): One who takes something; a person willing to participate in or buy something; one who receives more than he or she gives.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): One who takes or receives; one who catches or apprehends.
The common meaning of taker is broad and informal — anyone on the receiving end of a transaction or offer. The legal meaning is narrower and more technical: it identifies a specific party in a property transfer with defined rights relative to other claimants, particularly remaindermen or appointees. A researcher encountering "taker" in a deed, will, or trust instrument should not assume the casual meaning; the term carries structural significance within a chain of future interests.
---
Common Confusion
TAKER vs. REMAINDERMAN: These are related but distinct roles. The first taker holds the present estate; the remainderman holds the future interest that follows. In a grant "to A for life, remainder to B," A is the first taker and B is the remainderman. Conflating the two distorts the analysis of when possession transfers and what conditions govern it.
TAKER vs. DEVISEE: All devisees who receive real property under a will are takers, but not all takers are devisees. A taker may acquire an interest by inter vivos grant, power of appointment, or operation of law. The historical dictionaries treat taker and devisee as nearly synonymous, which reflects their focus on testamentary contexts; researchers should not carry that narrowness into non-testamentary instruments.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The word taker functions as a relational term — it only carries full meaning when you know what interest is taken and what comes after it. In historical sources, the term almost always appears in the context of devises and remainders; the vocabulary of powers of appointment, particularly "taker in default," developed more fully in later equity practice and may not be prominent in older dictionary entries or early treatises.
When reading historical deeds or wills, pay attention to whether the source uses "first taker" to signal that a remainder or executory interest follows. If the document names only a taker without specifying a remainder, that absence may itself be legally significant — it could affect whether a fee simple or a defeasible estate was created.
In corpus research across Law Mind materials, taker will appear with higher frequency in materials on future interests, rule against perpetuities, and powers of appointment than in general property or contract materials. The term is a reliable signal that the surrounding text concerns the mechanics of property succession rather than a simple sale or conveyance.
Jurisdictional variation in the law of future interests — particularly the abolition of the Rule in Shelley's Case or the Doctrine of Worthier Title in some states — can affect who qualifies as a taker and under what circumstances, so treat taker in historical state-law sources with attention to the applicable local rules.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Both editions of Black's Law Dictionary are in near-complete agreement, differing only in typographical presentation. Both define taker first in the general sense (one who takes or acquires) and then immediately narrow to the testamentary context, centering the entry on the first taker as the devisee of an immediate interest subject to a remainder or executory devise.
This narrowing reflects the historical dominance of real property doctrine in Anglo-American legal education and practice. The dictionaries do not address taker in default of appointment, which is a significant omission for researchers working with trust instruments or settlement documents involving powers. That gap is not a deficiency to be explained away — it is a useful signal that the taker-in-default concept, while rooted in early equity, became a routine term of art primarily in the twentieth century as trust practice expanded.
Neither edition engages with the possibility of a taker acquiring personal property rather than real estate, though the general definition technically encompasses both. Researchers should not read the property-law narrowing of the definition as excluding personal property; it reflects the drafting focus of the source period rather than a principled limitation.
---