STATE CODES

2 definitions found across Law Mind sources

See encyclopedia: Nuisance -- Public Nuisance and Land Use →
STATE CODESAuthored
The Law Mind • 1043 words
Definition
State codes are the organized, written compilations of a state's statutory law, arranged systematically by subject matter rather than in the chronological order of enactment. A state code consolidates the permanent, general laws passed by a state legislature into a single searchable reference structure, typically divided into titles, chapters, and sections. The code is the researcher's primary point of entry into a state's enacted law. Two related but distinct products carry the label: 1. COMPILED OR REVISED STATUTES: An unofficial or semi-official arrangement of session laws into topical order, often produced by private publishers, where the text of individual acts is preserved largely intact. 2. CODIFICATION PROPER: A more thorough reorganization in which the legislature or its designee rewrites, harmonizes, and re-enacts the statutory law as a coherent whole. The resulting code supersedes prior session laws and itself becomes the authoritative legal text. The distinction matters: in a true codification, the code controls; in a mere compilation, the underlying session law may still govern in case of conflict. ---
Common Confusion
"Code" is used loosely to describe at least three different things: (1) a state's compiled statutes, (2) a model or uniform code drafted by a private body (such as the Uniform Commercial Code or the Model Penal Code), and (3) regulatory codes issued by administrative agencies. These are not interchangeable. Model codes have no legal force until adopted by a legislature; administrative codes contain regulations, not statutes. A researcher who conflates them risks citing non-binding authority or missing the operative text entirely. ---
Why It Matters in Research
State codes are the standard research entry point for state statutory law, but the Law Mind corpus reflects a period when codification was incomplete, inconsistent, and actively contested. Several navigational traps are worth flagging: CHRONOLOGICAL DISPLACEMENT: Historical state codes often lag behind legislative reality. A provision may have been amended by session law years before the next code revision incorporated the change. When researching pre-twentieth-century law, always check whether the code edition you are reading reflects the law as it stood at the relevant date. OFFICIAL VERSUS UNOFFICIAL STATUS: Many nineteenth-century state codes were compiled by private attorneys under legislative contract. The resulting volumes varied in accuracy and completeness. Bouvier's treatment of New York's codification history illustrates how multiple revision projects overlapped and sometimes conflicted before a stable official code emerged. CODIFICATION VERSUS COMPILATION: Bouvier's entry focuses on New York's procedural history and the Field Code movement, which aimed at true codification. Researchers using sources from this era must determine whether a given state had achieved codification or was still operating under compiled session laws — the difference affects how to interpret conflicts between code text and original enactments. SUBJECT-MATTER CODES: Some states organize their law not in a single unified code but in subject-specific codes (criminal code, civil code, commercial code, probate code). A researcher unfamiliar with a given state's architecture may search the wrong code entirely. Cross-referencing with the encyclopedia entries on building codes and the Model Penal Code provides useful context for how subject-matter codes develop independently of general codification projects. GAPS IN HISTORICAL SOURCES: Bouvier's entry trails off mid-sentence in the available excerpt, covering only New York's early history through roughly 1828. It does not address the Field Code reforms of 1848, the later adoption of subject-matter codes in other states, or the twentieth-century phenomenon of uniform and model codes. Researchers relying solely on Bouvier for this term will have an incomplete picture of how state codes developed nationally. ---
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier's Law Dictionary identifies New York as "the pioneer in the work of codification," tracing its statutory history from the first post-Revolutionary procedure act of 1778 through the general revision of 1813 and the consolidation of practice-related provisions in 1828. The entry emphasizes the procedural dimension of early codification — the effort to rationalize court procedure and practice — rather than codification of substantive law. This reflects a genuine historical reality: early American codification efforts concentrated on civil procedure before turning to substantive law. The Field Code of 1848 (not mentioned in the surviving excerpt) became the model for procedural reform across many states, while David Dudley Field's parallel effort to codify substantive civil and criminal law met far more resistance and was adopted in only a handful of jurisdictions. Bouvier's entry, read in its historical context, captures codification as an ongoing and contested project rather than a completed achievement. This framing is accurate and useful: as of Bouvier's writing, most American states had not achieved anything approaching a comprehensive, re-enacted code. What they had were compilations of varying quality and authority. What Bouvier does not address — and what modern researchers need — is the twentieth-century shift toward annotated official codes, the role of uniform and model codes in driving interstate harmonization, and the digital transformation that made state codes continuously updated and freely accessible. ---
Jurisdictional Note
Every U.S. state maintains some form of statutory code, but the architecture, official status, and update frequency vary considerably. Some states maintain continuously updated official online codes; others still treat the session laws as primary and the code as persuasive. Researchers working across multiple states should verify both the official status of the code version they are using and the currency of that version before relying on it. ---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia: Criminal Law — Model Penal Code (Overview and Influence) — for the relationship between model codes and state criminal code adoption. The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia: Building Codes — Regulation, Enforcement, and Liability — for subject-matter regulatory codes as a distinct category from general statutory codes. The Law Mind Business Organizations & Corporate Law Encyclopedia: Bankruptcy General — Overview of the Bankruptcy Code (Title 11) and Jurisdiction — for a federal code as a structural counterpoint to state codification patterns. ---
Related Terms
Session Laws | Compiled Statutes | Revised Statutes | Annotated Code | Field Code | Uniform Laws | Model Penal Code | Statutory Construction | Administrative Code | Codification
STATE CODESmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
New York is the pioneer in the work of codification. In that state the first act relating to procedure after the or- ganization of state government was passed March 16, 1778. Various other acts were passed between 1801 and 1818. In 1813 there was a general revision of the law, and the subject of practice of the law. In 1828 the revisers collected into one act the various provisions relating to practice in all the courts which was made a part of the Re- vised Statutes. It is said that this part of the Revised Statutes constituted the first code of civil procedure in New York. It embraced nearly all the practice in all the courts and has been the basis of subsequent code revision. In 1848 the "Code of Pro- cedure" was adopted. Mr. David Dudley Field, the eminent writer on this subject, had begun his work on law reform in 1839. In Louisiana, the civil law prevails and there are complete codes framed there- under. One feature of the Louisiana code should be carefully noted. It assumes that cases not anticipated may occur. Art. 21 declares that "in all civil matters where there is no express law, the judge is bound to proceed and decide according to equity. To decide equitably an appeal is to be made to natural law and reason, or received usages, where positive law is silent." This code was adopted in 1824 and took effect in 1825, the revision of 1870 being the same code, with the slavery provisions omitted, and with such amendments as had previ- ously been made. It is said that the power above quoted has never been exercised ex- cept to furnish a remedy or mode of pro- cedure. FOREIGN COUNTRIES. On the continent of Europe the systems of law are gener- ally founded upon the civil law, and each country has its own code, which is usually an adaptation in whole or in part of Roman Law. These codes are different in char- acter, falling within sometimes one and sometimes another of the classes above enumerated, as they were intended to be scientific collections and classifications of existing law or to include new legislation. The modern codes of Europe were pre- ceded by periods of codification, such as that which Maine designates the "era of codes," in which, throughout the world, so far as the sphere of Roman and Hellenic influence extended, there appeared codes of the class of which The Twelve Tables is the conspicuous example; Maine, Anc. L. 2, 13; and the many codes of the Middle Ages based upon Roman law modified by local customs. There were also a great number of codes of maritime law, which in its na- ture was, and still is, well adapted to this exact form of expression, many of which are collected in the Black Book of the Admiral- ty (q. v.), which has been said to contain all maritime codes known at the time. Below are briefly referred to the best known his- toric codes, ancient and modern.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In