Definition
Special damage (also special damages) refers to actual, concrete losses that flow from a defendant's wrongful act but are not presumed by law to result from that act. Because the law will not assume these losses without proof, a plaintiff must plead and prove them specifically — hence the name. They are measured by the particular financial harm the plaintiff actually suffered: medical bills, lost wages, destroyed property, out-of-pocket costs, and similar quantifiable losses.
Special damage stands in contrast to general damages, which the law presumes follow naturally and necessarily from the type of wrong alleged and need not be itemized with the same specificity. Special damages require particularity at the pleading stage; a party who fails to plead them with reasonable specificity typically cannot recover them at trial.
The term carries two overlapping uses in legal practice:
1. Substantive: The category of actual, pecuniary losses (as opposed to presumed or intangible losses) that a plaintiff must prove through evidence — for example, a specific medical bill, a documented period of lost employment income, or the appraised value of damaged property.
2. Procedural/pleading: The requirement that losses not presumed by law must be identified with particularity in the complaint or declaration, giving the opposing party fair notice of the precise harm alleged.
In defamation law, special damage carries a third, narrower meaning: proof of actual, tangible harm — typically financial loss — required to maintain an action for defamatory statements that are not actionable per se. A plaintiff who cannot show special damage in this sense may be barred from recovery entirely for certain categories of defamatory speech.
---
Common Confusion
SPECIAL DAMAGE vs. GENERAL DAMAGE: The boundary is frequently blurred in briefs and older cases. General damages are those the law implies as a natural consequence of the wrong — pain and suffering, loss of consortium, presumed reputational harm in libel per se. Special damages are actual, specific losses that must be separately proved and pleaded. In practice, attorneys sometimes use "special damages" loosely to mean all out-of-pocket economic losses and "general damages" to mean all non-economic losses (pain, suffering, emotional distress). This usage is common in personal injury practice but does not map perfectly onto the classical common law distinction, which turns on whether the law presumes the loss rather than whether the loss is economic.
SPECIAL DAMAGE vs. CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGE: In contract law, "consequential damages" often performs the same function as "special damages" in tort — losses beyond the direct, immediate breach damages that flow from the breaching party's act. The terms are sometimes used interchangeably in commercial disputes, but the doctrinal frameworks differ. Hadley v. Baxendale foreseeability analysis governs consequential damages in contract; special damage in tort is governed by pleading rules and proximate cause principles.
---
Core Elements
To recover special damages, a plaintiff must generally establish:
1. Actual occurrence: The loss was real and specific, not presumed or hypothetical.
2. Causation: The defendant's wrongful act caused the particular loss claimed.
3. Specificity in pleading: The complaint identifies the item of loss with sufficient detail to notify the opposing party.
4. Proof at trial: Evidence — receipts, records, expert testimony — sufficient to establish the amount of each claimed item.
In defamation cases where special damage is a prerequisite to suit (defamation not actionable per se), the plaintiff must further show that the harm was material and pecuniary in nature, not merely social embarrassment or hurt feelings.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The distinction between special and general damages is a persistent research trap because courts and treatises use the terms inconsistently across time, jurisdiction, and legal context.
In historical sources, "special damage" frequently appears in discussions of defamation and public nuisance — two areas where the distinction between presumed harm and actual proved harm is constitutionally and doctrinally significant. A researcher reading older cases on public nuisance must understand that a private plaintiff could only sue if they could show special damage distinguishing their loss from the harm suffered by the general public. This use of the term is separate from the pleading-specificity meaning and from the personal injury damages calculation meaning. The same phrase does three different jobs depending on context.
The pleading requirement attached to special damages is one of the most litigated procedural traps in civil practice. Courts in many jurisdictions have held that a failure to plead special damages with particularity in the complaint constitutes a waiver, even if the plaintiff could prove the losses at trial. Researchers working on civil procedure questions — especially amended pleadings and relation-back issues — should check whether "special damages" were timely and adequately pleaded, not merely whether they were provable.
Modern personal injury litigation has substantially regularized special damages into a category often called "economic damages" or "specials," encompassing medicals, lost wages, and property loss. This usage is operationally useful but imprecise. When researching damages caps, comparative fault apportionment, or collateral source rules, verify whether the controlling statute or case law tracks the classical special/general distinction or the modern economic/non-economic split, as they do not always coincide.
The defamation meaning of special damage interacts with First Amendment doctrine after Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. Researchers working on defamation of private figures must be careful: the constitutional framework limits presumed and punitive damages in some cases and requires actual injury proof that resembles but is not identical to the common law special damage requirement.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary captures the classical formulation accurately: general damages are those the law implies or presumes from the wrong itself; special damages are those that actually resulted but are not implied by law. Black's further notes that special damages may be superadded to general damages (where the act was wrongful on its face) or may be the only actionable harm (where the act was "indifferent" — meaning not wrongful in itself — and only became actionable because of the actual harm caused).
This second category — the "act indifferent in itself" made actionable only by proved special damage — is of particular historical importance. It explains why, in public nuisance and certain defamation contexts, a plaintiff without special damage has no cause of action at all, not merely a reduced recovery. Historical dictionaries and treatises emphasize this point, but modern practice materials often understate it, leaving researchers to rediscover the doctrine when it arises in litigation.
Older editions of Black's and contemporaneous treatises on pleading (Chitty on Pleading, Stephen on Pleading) give extensive treatment to the requirement that special damages be specifically declared, because under common law pleading this was a matter of form as much as substance — an undeclared item could not be proved. Modern notice-pleading rules have relaxed but not eliminated this requirement, and the residual pleading obligation is still enforced with some rigor for special damages.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Federal courts apply Rule 9(g) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which expressly requires that items of special damage be specifically stated in the pleading. State courts vary: some follow analogous provisions; others have absorbed the requirement into general pleading sufficiency standards. Defamation doctrine on special damage also varies by state, particularly on whether harm to reputation alone — without pecuniary loss — can satisfy the requirement for categories of defamation not actionable per se.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Damages and Remedies in Tort — Special Damages (Medical, Lost Wages, Property) (The Law Mind Torts & Personal Injury Encyclopedia)
Special Damages — Medical Expenses, Lost Wages, Lost Earning Capacity, and Future Damages (The Law Mind Remedies & Equity Encyclopedia)
Damages and Remedies in Tort — Nominal Damages in Tort (The Law Mind Torts & Personal Injury Encyclopedia)
---