SETTLING DAY - The Law Mind Legal Dictionary

SETTLING DAYAuthored

The Law Mind • 1089 words

Definition

Settling day is a designated date in stock exchange practice on which transactions made "for the account" — that is, deferred or credit-based trades entered into during a trading period — are formally settled between buyers and sellers. On the settling day, accounts are made up, ownership is transferred, and payment obligations are discharged for all trades executed during the preceding account period.

The term belongs primarily to the practice of the London Stock Exchange as it operated under the account system, in which trades were not settled trade-by-trade but rather accumulated over a fixed period and resolved collectively on a single day. The frequency of settling days varied by the type of security: for consols (consolidated government annuities), settling days occurred once monthly, typically near the beginning of the month; for most other stocks and shares, settling days fell twice monthly, at mid-month and month's end.

Common Language

Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Not independently defined. The phrase "settling day" has no significant entry in general modern dictionaries, reflecting its status as a term of art largely absorbed into modern financial regulation rather than common speech.

Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Not defined as a distinct entry. "Settle" in Webster's carries meanings of resolution, payment of accounts, and quieting of disputes — senses consistent with but broader than the technical exchange usage.

The ordinary sense of "settling" a debt or account maps closely enough onto the legal-financial usage that a lay reader would not be badly misled, but the precision of the term — its grounding in a structured, exchange-regulated calendar rather than ad hoc payment — is entirely missing from the common meaning. A researcher unfamiliar with the account system might underestimate how institutionally specific settling day was.

Common Confusion

Settling day should not be confused with settlement date in modern securities law and practice. Settlement date is the current standard term for the date by which a securities transaction must be completed — now governed by regulatory rules (such as the SEC's T+1 or T+2 settlement cycles in U.S. markets). Settling day, by contrast, describes the collective, periodic settlement mechanism of the older English account system, which has no direct modern equivalent. The concepts share a family resemblance but belong to different regulatory frameworks separated by over a century of market reform.

Why It Matters in Research

This term is almost entirely a creature of English stock exchange practice and English financial law. Researchers encountering settling day in historical legal sources should treat it as a marker of the account-period trading system that dominated the London Stock Exchange through the nineteenth and into the early twentieth century. That system was formally abolished when the London Stock Exchange moved to rolling settlement in the 1990s, meaning settling day as a live legal concept has no modern counterpart in English or American securities regulation.

Several research traps follow from this:

First, American legal sources rarely use settling day with any technical precision. The account system was not adopted in U.S. markets, so American treatises and cases that reference settling day are almost always discussing English law or English exchange practice — often in the context of fraud, gaming, or wagering contract disputes arising out of speculative trading.

Second, Bouvier's note that a conspiracy to obtain a settling day by fraudulent means could give rise to criminal or civil liability points toward an important body of historical case law on stock exchange fraud and market manipulation. A researcher tracing the history of securities fraud or market manipulation doctrine may find settling day appearing as a fact-specific element in English decisions, particularly from the latter half of the nineteenth century.

Third, the variation in settling day frequency by security type (monthly for consols, twice-monthly for other stocks) is consequential for reading historical contract disputes. Whether a trade was for the account and which settling day governed it could determine questions of breach, damages, and delivery obligations. Researchers analyzing historical financial litigation should identify the specific security at issue before assuming a uniform calendar.

Fourth, nothing in the American historical dictionaries (including Rapalje & Lawrence) adds to the basic English exchange definition — a signal that the term had limited independent American legal development.

Historical Dictionary Support

Black's Law Dictionary, Rapalje & Lawrence, and Bouvier's Law Dictionary give virtually identical definitions, all tracing the term to the mechanics of the English stock exchange account system. The near-verbatim agreement across all three dictionaries reflects that this was a term of art with a fixed, well-understood meaning in financial practice rather than a concept that evolved through litigation.

Bouvier's is the most expansive of the three, noting Wharton's Law Dictionary as an additional source and flagging the criminal dimension — conspiracy to obtain a settling day by fraud — which neither Black's nor Rapalje & Lawrence mentions. Bouvier's also specifies the timing of settling days for English and foreign stocks with slightly greater granularity. These additions make Bouvier's the richer starting point for a researcher interested in the legal pathologies that could attach to settling day manipulation.

None of the historical dictionaries addresses the question of what happens to contracts made for the account when a party fails to perform by settling day — a question that generated substantial English case law. The dictionaries define the mechanism without mapping the legal consequences of its disruption.

Jurisdictional Note

Settling day is a term of English financial law with no equivalent doctrine in American securities regulation. Researchers working in American legal sources after roughly 1900 will rarely encounter it except in historical or comparative contexts. Modern securities settlement terminology (settlement date, T+1, T+2) governs current practice in both U.S. and U.K. markets and should not be read back into historical sources using settling day.

SETTLING DAYmain

Black's Law Dictionary • 1891

The day on which transactions for the "account" are made up on the English stock-exchange. In consols they are monthly; in other investments, twice in the month.

SETTLING DAYmain

Rapalje & Lawrence • 1883

-The day on which transactions for the "account" are made up on the English stock exchange. In consols they are monthly; in other investments, twice in the month. SEVENTH CHILD, (in a will). 3 Bro. Ch. 148. SEVENTH OR YOUNGEST CHILD, (in a will). 8 Com. Dig. 472; 2 Cox Ch. 258. SEVENTY ACRES, (in a deed). 2 Ohio. 327. are then tenants in common. (Co. Litt. 191a.) As to severable hereditaments and chattels, see Id. 164b, 200a. See, also, JOINT TENANCY, 7. 2. Again, when a claim is composed of several parts, some of them may be put forward or enforced without the others. the latter are said to be severable, and the act of severing them is called "severance;" as where A. having brought an action in an inferior court for causes which were partly within and partly without the jurisdiction of the court, he was allowed to sever them by abandoning the latter part of his case, so as to keep the action in the inferior court. (Ellis v. Fleming, 1 C. P. D. 237.) Το "sever in action" is to bring several, i. e. separate actions. (Co. Litt. 195b.) And when two or more defendants to an action put in separate defenses, instead of joining in one defense, they are said to sever. See ENTIRE; APPORTIONMENT, & 3 et seq.; SEVERAL; SEVERALTY. 3. Fixtures, crops, &c. Severance is also the act of removing fixtures, growing crops, or minerals from land. (Chit. Cont. 326 et seq.) A tenant who is entitled to remove fixtures must sever them during his term, or he loses his right. (Ib.) As to the effect of severance on growing crops and minerals, see those titles. SEVERAL is opposed to "joint." Thus, tenants in common of land are said to be seised by several titles, so that if they are disseised each has a separate right of action, while joint tenants are seised by a joint title, and therefore if they are disseised they ought to bring one action to recover the land. (Litt. § 314.) As to several hereditaments, see HEREDITAMENT, 87; as to a several pasture, see PASTURE, 23. See, also, SEVERALTY. SEVERAL, (more than two; includes seven). 58 Ala. 153, 164. (in a will). 67 Ν. Υ. 348. SEVERAL AND RESPECTIVE, (in a covenant). 10 Barn. & C. 410. SEVER-SEVERABLE-SEVER119.

SETTLING DAYmain

Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928

The day on which transactions for the "account" are made up on the Stock Exchange. Whart. Dict. The settling days for English and foreign stocks and shares occur twice a month, the middle and the end. Those for con- sols are once in every month, generally near the commencement of the month; Moz. & W. A conspiracy to obtain a set- tling day by fraudulent means in order to defraud buyers of shares, or a conspiracy by fraudulent means to raise or lower the price of shares with intent to defraud buyers or sellers, is an indictable offence; 1 Q. B. D. 730; 3 M. & S. 67; 2 Lind. Part. *711, 816.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

Subscribe Encyclopedia Sign In