Definition
To set on foot means to originate, initiate, or put into operation a proceeding, action, or course of conduct. In legal usage, the phrase most commonly appears in older procedural and pleading contexts to describe the commencement or activation of a legal process — a suit, prosecution, inquiry, or scheme — particularly emphasizing the act of getting it underway rather than its completion.
The term is largely archaic in modern drafting but persists in historical instruments, legislative recitals, and older case law where precision about the moment of initiation matters — for example, identifying when a conspiracy was set on foot, when a fraudulent scheme was set on foot, or when a legal proceeding was set on foot for purposes of tolling statutes of limitations or establishing priority.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): To originate; to put into action.
Historical common usage: The phrase "set on foot" was standard idiomatic English meaning to start, launch, or put something in motion — used freely in commercial, political, and everyday contexts (e.g., "a subscription was set on foot," "an inquiry was set on foot").
The gap between common and legal meaning is narrow but meaningful in one respect: in legal contexts, the phrase carries temporal precision. Determining exactly when something was "set on foot" — a conspiracy, a fraudulent conveyance, a prosecution — can fix the moment from which legal consequences run, including limitations periods, the accrual of rights, or the triggering of criminal liability. Common usage treats the phrase loosely; legal usage treats it as a defined point in time.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encountering "set on foot" in historical legal materials should treat it as a marker of initiation — the phrase signals that the drafter was identifying a precise starting moment rather than describing an ongoing condition.
Several research traps attend this term:
First, the phrase appears heavily in 18th and 19th century pleading, indictment forms, and equity proceedings. In criminal pleading, a conspiracy or fraudulent design is frequently said to have been "set on foot" at a particular time and place — this language is functional, not decorative, because it anchors the charge temporally.
Second, in limitations doctrine, when a right of action accrued or when a proceeding began is sometimes framed as when it was "set on foot." Researchers tracing limitations arguments in older case law should search for this phrase alongside "accrued" and "commenced."
Third, in equity and fraud contexts, schemes and contrivances are routinely described as having been "set on foot" — this connects to the doctrine of fraudulent conveyance and to inquiries about notice, as courts ask whether a creditor could have known a fraudulent scheme had been set on foot.
Fourth, the phrase is essentially absent from modern statutory and regulatory drafting. If you encounter it in a post-1950 instrument, it is almost certainly a carry-forward from an older form or a jurisdiction with conservative drafting conventions.
The Bouvier's fragment associating the term with "arrange; place in order; set forward; put in the place of being ready" (53 Fed. Rep. 538) confirms the operational sense: not merely planning or intending, but actually setting the mechanism in motion.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier's Law Dictionary is the primary historical source available for this term, and it treats "set on foot" as a term of action meaning to arrange, place in order, advance, or put in a state of readiness. The brief entry aligns with the phrase's broader legal usage across 19th century American and English sources.
Bouvier does not provide a dedicated definitional entry for the phrase in the manner of a major substantive term, which is itself instructive: "set on foot" functioned as a term of art embedded in procedural and pleading formulas rather than as a freestanding legal concept requiring extended definition. Its meaning was assumed to be accessible through ordinary legal idiom.
No significant divergence among historical sources is apparent on the core meaning. The phrase is used consistently across equity, common law pleading, and criminal law contexts to denote initiation or commencement. What varies is the legal consequence that attaches to the moment of initiation — which depends entirely on the doctrine at issue, not on the phrase itself.
Historical sources do not address the modern near-disappearance of the term, which is a function of plain-language drafting reform rather than any change in the underlying concept.
---
Jurisdictional Note
No meaningful jurisdictional variation exists in the meaning of "set on foot" — the phrase carried consistent meaning across American and English courts. Its practical significance today varies only to the extent that older statutory and common law formulations remain operative in a given jurisdiction.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Contracts & Commercial Law Encyclopedia — Assignment of Rights: Rights of Assignee Against Obligor (Defenses, Set-Offs): Relevant when researching whether a defense or set-off was in existence — that is, whether it had been "set on foot" — at the time of assignment, which determines whether it may be raised against an assignee.
---