Definition
Royal grants are conveyances of record issued by the Crown in England, transferring rights, title, interests, or privileges from the sovereign to a subject or institution. Historically, the Crown held the capacity to convey land, franchises, monopolies, offices, and other privileges through two principal documentary forms: letters patent and letters close (also called writs close). Royal grants were formal instruments of the highest legal dignity, carrying the authority of the sovereign and enforceable as matters of public record.
1. Letters patent. Open instruments addressed to the public at large, sealed with the Great Seal on the outside so that the document could be inspected without breaking the seal. Letters patent were used for grants of land, titles of nobility, franchises, monopolies, and public offices. The term "patent" in modern property and intellectual property law descends directly from this form.
2. Letters close (writs close). Sealed instruments addressed to specific individuals, closed and sealed so that only the recipient could open them. Letters close were used for private communications and orders of a more administrative or transactional character, rather than for public declarations of right.
---
Common Confusion
Royal grants are sometimes conflated with ordinary private grants or deeds. The distinction is fundamental: a royal grant issues from the sovereign and conveys interests held in the Crown's own right or by royal prerogative, while a private grant conveys interests held by a private person. The rules of construction also differ — courts traditionally construed royal grants strictly against the grantee on the theory that ambiguity should not be resolved against the Crown, a principle that influenced land title disputes in both English and early American law.
Do not confuse royal grants with parliamentary grants. Parliament could authorize appropriations or confer statutory rights, but the formal instrument of a royal grant emanated from the Crown's prerogative power, not from statute.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The primary research relevance of royal grants in the Law Mind corpus is as foundational title documents in American land law, particularly for states whose territorial origins lie in colonial charters or land grants from the English, Spanish, or French crowns. Any chain of title tracing back to colonial-era conveyances may ultimately rest on a royal grant or its foreign-sovereign equivalent.
Several specific traps await researchers working in historical sources:
First, the construction rule. English and early American courts applied a rule that royal grants were to be construed strictly — ambiguous language was read against the grantee and in favor of the Crown. This canon of construction persisted in American law as a general principle applied to government grants and is the direct ancestor of the modern rule that grants from the government are read narrowly. Researchers examining easement or mineral rights claims rooted in government patents should be alert to this principle.
Second, the transition from royal to government grants. After American independence, the grantor role passed to the federal and state governments. The legal forms and terminology carried over substantially, but the constitutional framework changed entirely. Disputes over the validity or scope of early American land grants frequently turned on whether the underlying colonial-era royal grant was valid, what it actually conveyed, and whether successor governments were bound by its terms.
Third, the letters patent connection. The word "patent" as it appears in land records — especially federal land patents issued by the General Land Office — traces its meaning directly from letters patent as a form of royal grant. This terminological continuity can mislead researchers unfamiliar with the historical lineage, causing them to miss the full body of doctrine governing construction and challenge of such instruments.
Fourth, easements and franchises. Royal grants were historically a primary mechanism for creating franchises (the right to operate a ferry, hold a market, mine minerals) and easements over others' land. Researchers tracing the origin of an easement or franchise claim in states with deep colonial histories may need to work backward through the royal grant record.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary and Bouvier's Law Dictionary are in full agreement on the definition: royal grants are conveyances of record in England, of two kinds — letters patent and letters close. Both sources cite Blackstone's Commentaries for authority (Bouvier citing 2 Bl. Com. 346; Black's citing Stephens' Commentaries). The entries are spare, functioning as cross-references to fuller treatment under PATENT and LETTERS PATENT rather than as standalone expositions.
What the historical dictionaries do not address is the American doctrinal afterlife of royal grants — the construction canon, the title chain implications, and the transition to federal and state land patents. Researchers should treat the dictionary entries as structural definitions only and consult Blackstone's Commentaries Book II, chapters on the Crown's tenures and grants, for fuller treatment of the English law. For American application, treatises on land titles in particular states (especially southeastern, Gulf Coast, and southwestern states with Spanish or English colonial grant histories) are essential supplements.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The practical significance of royal grants in title research is concentrated in states whose land was subject to English, Spanish, or French colonial grants before American sovereignty: the original thirteen colonies, Florida, Louisiana, and the former Spanish territories of the Southwest. In these jurisdictions, the validity and scope of early grants remains a live question in certain title disputes. Other states whose land passed through federal disposition under the Land Ordinance and General Land Office system encounter the conceptual heir of royal grants — the federal land patent — but not the historical instruments themselves.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Property Law — Easements: Creation by Express Grant or Reservation
---