Definition
The right of appeal is the legally recognized entitlement of a party to seek review of a lower tribunal's decision by a higher authority. It encompasses both the procedural mechanism and the substantive right to invoke that mechanism.
Two distinct sources can give rise to a right of appeal:
1. Statutory right of appeal: A right expressly conferred by legislation, authorizing a party to seek appellate review as a matter of right — meaning the higher court must hear the case, not merely may hear it.
2. Leave-based right of appeal: A right that arises not from statute alone but from a grant of permission by a judge or tribunal. Where a court grants leave to appeal, the party acquires a cognizable right of appeal even in the absence of a specific statutory entitlement. This is the expansion Bouvier's captures: the right of appeal is not limited to statutory grants.
The distinction matters because a right of appeal is different from a mere opportunity or petition for discretionary review. A right implies an obligation on the reviewing body to entertain the appeal; discretionary review (such as certiorari) carries no such obligation.
---
Common Confusion
Right of appeal is frequently confused with the right to petition for discretionary review. A right of appeal generally compels the appellate body to exercise jurisdiction; a petition for certiorari or leave to appeal in the discretionary sense merely asks the higher court to accept the case at its option. The two mechanisms coexist in most court systems, and a party may have an absolute right of appeal on some issues while being limited to discretionary review on others. Conflating them leads to critical research errors, particularly when assessing whether an appellate deadline is jurisdictional or merely procedural.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Several research traps attach to this term.
First, the scope of the right changes with the nature of the proceeding. In criminal cases, constitutional constraints shape whether and how a right of appeal exists — a convicted defendant typically has a statutory right of direct appeal, but the government's right to appeal acquittals is sharply curtailed by double jeopardy principles. In civil cases, the right is largely statutory, and the breadth of review on appeal varies significantly by issue type (questions of law versus findings of fact).
Second, administrative appeals follow their own logic. The IRS Appeals Office, for example, operates under an administrative framework distinct from judicial appellate review. Characterizing access to the IRS Appeals Office as a "right of appeal" in the same breath as a federal court appeal misleads researchers about the nature of the review, the standard applied, and the legal consequences of bypassing the process.
Third, military and non-judicial punishment contexts add another layer. Under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, a service member's right to appeal non-judicial punishment is narrower and procedurally different from civilian appellate rights. The term "right of appeal" in military sources should not be read through a civilian lens without checking the specific regulatory framework.
Fourth, the leave-based right of appeal (noted in Bouvier's) is particularly significant in English and Commonwealth legal sources. Researchers working with pre-twentieth-century English cases will encounter this framework frequently — where appeal was not a matter of automatic right but required judicial certification. American researchers accustomed to statutory rights of appeal may misread English decisions that condition appellate standing on leave granted below.
Fifth, timeliness is structural to the right. A right of appeal is generally not self-executing — it must be invoked within prescribed deadlines. Many jurisdictions treat the failure to file a timely notice of appeal as a jurisdictional defect, extinguishing the right entirely rather than merely creating a procedural default.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier's Law Dictionary frames the right of appeal broadly, explicitly rejecting the narrower view that would limit it to cases where a statute grants the right. Bouvier's acknowledges that judicial leave to appeal is equally sufficient to create the right, citing English authority. This is a meaningful position because it resists the tendency to conflate "right" with "statutory right," preserving room for court-granted access as a legitimate source of appellate standing.
What Bouvier's does not address — and what later American legal development would fill in — is the constitutional dimension of the right in criminal cases, the distinction between interlocutory and final judgment appeals, or the emergence of administrative appellate structures entirely outside the judicial branch. Bouvier's definition is essentially procedural and jurisdiction-conferring; modern usage requires that procedural core to be layered against substantive and constitutional frameworks that postdate the edition.
---
Jurisdictional Note
In the United States federal system, the right of appeal in most civil and criminal cases is governed by statute (28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292 for civil; 18 U.S.C. § 3742 for sentencing). State court systems vary considerably in what appeals are of right versus discretionary. In England and Wales, the current framework under the Criminal Appeal Act 1968 and Civil Procedure Rules has substantially modified the older leave-based structure Bouvier's reflects, though leave requirements persist for many categories of appeal.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia: Direct Appeal — Right, Scope, and Procedure
The Law Mind Tax Encyclopedia: IRS Appeals Office Administrative Appeals
The Law Mind Military, Veterans & Admiralty Law Encyclopedia: Non-Judicial Punishment — Article 15, Commander's Authority, and Appeal Rights
---