Definition
A resolutive condition (also resolutory condition) is a contractual or obligatory condition that, upon the occurrence of a specified uncertain future event, automatically terminates an already-existing obligation or right. The obligation is fully in force from the moment it arises; the condition does not suspend performance but instead dissolves it if and when the triggering event occurs.
This distinguishes a resolutive condition from its counterpart, the suspensive condition, which delays the creation of an obligation until an uncertain event occurs. Under a resolutive condition, the parties perform as if no condition existed — until the condition is fulfilled, at which point the obligation unravels, typically with retroactive effect restoring parties to their prior positions.
The concept originates in civil law and Scots law and is most at home in civilian jurisdictions. It appears in contract law, property transfers, trusts, and testamentary instruments wherever a party wishes to grant a right subject to forfeiture upon a future contingency.
---
Common Confusion
RESOLUTIVE CONDITION vs. SUSPENSIVE CONDITION: These are mirror-image concepts that researchers frequently conflate. A suspensive condition holds an obligation in abeyance until an event occurs — the right does not yet exist. A resolutive condition gives the right immediately but extinguishes it if an event occurs — the right exists now but may be taken away. Historical sources, including Erskine and Pothier, treat these as the fundamental binary division of conditional obligations. Confusing the two inverts the entire analytical framework.
RESOLUTIVE CONDITION vs. CONDITION SUBSEQUENT (common law): In common law terminology, a "condition subsequent" is functionally analogous — it operates to defeat an already-vested right upon the happening of a specified event. Researchers moving between civilian and common law sources must recognize that Bouvier and other mixed-tradition dictionaries may use these terms near-interchangeably, while modern civilian scholarship keeps them distinct. The mechanisms of retroactivity and remedy may differ even where the surface description matches.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term is a civil law and Scots law term of art. Researchers working in common law jurisdictions will encounter it primarily in: (1) Louisiana law, where the civilian tradition is codified; (2) South African, Quebec, or Scottish legal materials; (3) comparative law scholarship; and (4) older Anglo-American treatises drawing on Pothier or the Roman law tradition.
Bouvier's entry is terse and anchored in Scots law via Erskine's Institutes. Researchers relying on Bouvier alone for a common law jurisdiction will find the term underexplained. The entry does not address retroactivity, the distinction from condition subsequent, or how courts in mixed jurisdictions have applied the concept.
In Louisiana, resolutive and suspensive conditions are codified in the Civil Code and have a developed jurisprudence. Researchers treating Bouvier's Scots-law gloss as sufficient for Louisiana work should proceed with caution and consult the Louisiana Civil Code directly.
For historical property documents — particularly deeds, marriage settlements, and testamentary trusts drafted in civilian or mixed-tradition jurisdictions — identifying whether a condition is resolutive or suspensive is essential to determining whether a right had vested at any given moment. This affects questions of alienability, succession, and creditor claims.
When searching historical corpus materials, note that older sources may use "resolutory condition," "resolving condition," or the Latin form "condicio resolutiva." Common law sources may describe the same mechanism as a "condition subsequent" without using civilian terminology at all.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier's Law Dictionary defines a resolutive condition in the context of Scots law as "a condition of which the obligation comes to an end on the occurrence of the uncertain event," citing Erskine's Principles (Book 3, Title 1, Section 8). This is accurate as far as it goes but is conspicuously minimal — a single sentence that captures the mechanical definition without addressing the civilian theoretical architecture behind it.
Erskine's own treatment, drawn from the Roman and Scots civilian tradition, situates resolutive conditions within a broader taxonomy of conditional obligations alongside suspensive conditions, distinguishing them by the temporal relationship between the condition's fulfillment and the existence of the obligation.
Bouvier does not address the concept in its broader civilian or comparative dimension, reflecting the dictionary's primary orientation toward common law practice. Researchers should not read Bouvier's brief entry as a complete account. For deeper historical treatment, Pothier's Treatise on Obligations and Domat's Civil Law are the foundational civilian sources; both were influential in shaping how mixed-jurisdiction American courts, particularly in Louisiana, understood conditional obligations in the nineteenth century.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The term is operative law primarily in civilian and mixed jurisdictions: Louisiana, Quebec, Scotland, South Africa, and civil law countries generally. In purely common law jurisdictions, the functional equivalent is the condition subsequent, though the doctrinal details — particularly regarding retroactivity and restitution — may diverge. Researchers should not assume doctrinal equivalence without verifying how each jurisdiction handles the consequences of fulfillment.
---