L. Remainder; residue. 1. In patent law, what is left after a process of separation. There are as many different residuums of a substance as there are distinct products which may by taken away from it. Showing that all the matter that is in the residuum of the earlier of two patents is also in, and is obtained by separation from, the residuum of the patent of later date, does not make out an infringement on the former. It does not show that the patents are the same. If the rule were otherwise, a prior patent for the same use, of the common source, would cover both." 1 [Collison v. Teal, 4 Saw. 243 (1877), cases, Deady, J. 2 Castello v. Castello, 14 F. R. 207, 210 (1882), cases. 3 [Phelps v. Robbins, 40 Conn. 264 (1873), Carpenter, J. • Willard's Appeal, 68 Pa. 332 (1871), Sharswood, J.; 41 Leg. Int. 314. Carr v. Dings, 58 Mo. 406 (1874); Harker v. Reilly, 4 Del. Ch. 82 (1871); 2 Redf. Wills, 448. • Laing v. Barbour, 119 Mass. 525 (1876), cases; 24 Moak, 297; 2 Williams, Ex. 1014; 4 Kent, 541. Parsons v. Coalgate, 15 F. R. 600 (1882), Wheeler, J. At common law, an office was regarded as a burden which the appointee was bound, in the interest of the community and of good government, to bear. From this it followed that after an office was assumed it could not be laid down without the consent of the appointing power. This was required that public interests might suffer no inconvenience for the want of servants to execute the laws. Acceptance may be manifested either by a formal declaration or by the appointment of a successor. In this country, a contrary doctrine may have obtained; but it will be assumed that the common-law rule prevails unless the contrary is shown. See OFFICE, 1.