Definition
A resealing writ is a procedural device in English law by which a master of the court affixes a second official seal to an existing writ, either to extend the writ's operative life beyond its original period of validity or to correct an irregularity that would otherwise render the writ defective. The act of resealing is, in effect, a formal renewal or ratification: the master's second seal signals that the writ remains authorized and operative, overcoming either a lapse of time or a technical flaw in its original issuance.
Two distinct purposes merged under the single label:
1. Continuation. A writ issued but not yet served or executed within the prescribed time could expire. Resealing renewed its authority, allowing process to continue without requiring the party to begin fresh proceedings.
2. Cure of irregularity. Where a writ contained a technical defect — a misdescription, a sealing error, or a similar formal flaw — a master could reseal it to validate the instrument rather than compelling the party to sue out a new writ entirely.
---
Common Confusion
Resealing a writ should not be confused with the modern Commonwealth procedure also called "resealing," in which a grant of probate or letters of administration issued in one jurisdiction is recognized and given effect in another jurisdiction by affixing a second seal. That probate resealing procedure operates under entirely different rules (most prominently colonial and Commonwealth reciprocity statutes) and involves no master of court correcting a defect or extending a litigation instrument. The shared word reflects the same physical act — a second application of an official seal — but the legal contexts, purposes, and consequences are wholly distinct. Researchers encountering "resealing" in probate or succession materials should not assume any connection to this writ procedure.
---
Why It Matters in Research
**Jurisdictional and temporal scope.** The resealing writ is an English common law procedure associated with the pre-Judicature Act court system, particularly the practices of the superior courts at Westminster. It does not appear as a live procedural mechanism in modern American federal or state practice. Researchers working in American materials will not find it as an operative tool; they will find it only in treatises describing historical English procedure, in early American authorities that imported English common law wholesale, or in older practice manuals.
**The historical sources are thin.** All three dictionary sources present nearly identical one-sentence entries. Bouvier cites Wharton's Law Dictionary as the proximate source, meaning the definition traveled through secondary lexicography rather than emerging from primary statutory or case authority. Researchers should treat this as a technical label of English practice rather than a term with a rich doctrinal body behind it.
**Trap for the historical researcher.** The term appears in older American pleading and practice guides that catalogued English common law forms without always distinguishing between what American courts had adopted and what remained purely English. A researcher working in early American procedural materials who encounters "resealing" should verify whether the source is describing actual American practice in that jurisdiction or simply reprinting English forms wholesale — a common feature of early nineteenth-century American practice manuals.
**Connection to broader writ research.** Understanding the resealing writ requires knowing the master's general superintending function over writs in the English superior courts: the master was the officer responsible for the formal integrity of process, and resealing was one of several tools for managing defective or lapsed instruments. Researchers exploring writ practice broadly — particularly the line between void and voidable process, or between amendment and nullity — will encounter the resealing writ as part of that larger picture.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The three source dictionaries present substantially identical definitions, all tracing to the same short description: "the second sealing of a writ by a master so as to continue it, or to cure it of an irregularity." Black's (both editions) and Bouvier reproduce this formulation without elaboration. Bouvier's explicit citation to Wharton confirms the definition was drawn from a prior lexicographic source rather than synthesized independently from primary authority.
No source elaborates on which courts employed the procedure, what standards governed a master's decision to reseal, or how the practice developed or declined. The first and second editions of Black's are identical on this point, suggesting no substantive development between editions. The historical dictionaries are thus useful for confirming the term's technical meaning but offer no guidance on its procedural mechanics, frequency of use, or relationship to specific English court rules.
What the historical dictionaries miss: the distinction between resealing for continuation versus resealing for cure deserves more attention than any source gives it. The two functions implicate different procedural logics — one is about time, the other about formal validity — and a practitioner or scholar examining a specific historical dispute would need to consult English practice treatises (Tidd's Practice, Archbold's Practice) for substantive guidance that the dictionaries do not supply.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The resealing writ is a product of English superior court practice and has no direct counterpart in modern American federal procedure. American courts historically possessed analogous powers to renew or amend defective process, but those powers developed under distinct local rules and statutes rather than under the "resealing" label. Researchers working in English legal history or comparative procedure will find this term operative; those working in contemporary U.S. practice will not.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia: Coram Nobis and Other Extraordinary Writs (criminal_240)
The Law Mind Constitutional Law Encyclopedia: Habeas Corpus — The Great Writ and Suspension Clause (constitutional_151)
The Law Mind Civil Procedure & Evidence Encyclopedia: Extraordinary Writs and Habeas Corpus — 28 USC 2241–2255 (civpro_113)
Note: These entries address the broader writ tradition within which resealing writ practice arose. None addresses the resealing writ specifically, but researchers tracing the history and mechanics of English and American writ practice will find useful contextual grounding in all three.
---