Definition
Remittitur of record is a procedural term referring to the formal sending back, or return, of the record of a case from an appellate court to the court below after the appellate proceeding has concluded. When an appellate court has decided a matter on appeal, it does not retain jurisdiction over the case indefinitely. The remittitur of record is the mechanism by which the appellate court certifies and transmits the record — together with its judgment, opinion, or mandate — back to the originating tribunal so that the lower court may carry the appellate decision into effect.
The term encompasses two distinct but closely related concepts:
1. The act of sending the record back: the procedural step by which the appellate court formally returns jurisdiction to the lower court, typically accomplished by transmitting the certified record along with the court's mandate.
2. The document itself: the written certificate or instrument by which the appellate court effects that transmission, formally communicating the appellate judgment to the lower court.
In modern federal practice, this function is substantially performed by the issuance of the appellate court's mandate under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 41. In state practice, the terminology and mechanics vary, but the underlying concept — that the lower court's authority to act is restored only upon return of the record — remains consistent.
---
Common Confusion
REMITTITUR OF RECORD should not be confused with the more commonly encountered term REMITTITUR, which in modern American practice refers primarily to a trial court's order reducing an excessive jury verdict as a condition of denying a new trial. These are distinct doctrines sharing only a common Latin root (remittere, to send back or release). The remittitur of record concerns the appellate transmission of proceedings; the remittitur of damages concerns the reduction of a monetary award. Historical sources use "remittitur" across both contexts, and researchers encountering the word in older materials must determine from context which sense is intended. A third usage — remittitur of penalty — appears in equity and bond law, adding further ambiguity in pre-twentieth-century sources.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working with appellate records, particularly in pre-twentieth-century materials, will encounter "remittitur of record" as a term of active procedural significance rather than mere formality. Several research traps are worth flagging:
**Jurisdictional trigger for lower court action.** Until the remittitur of record issues, the lower court generally lacks authority to act on the appellate judgment. This timing rule generated substantial litigation in older practice, and researchers tracing the procedural history of a case must identify when the remittitur issued — not merely when the appellate opinion was handed down — to understand when the lower court could lawfully proceed.
**Confusion with related remittitur terms.** As noted above, historical treatises and reporters use "remittitur" loosely. Rapalje & Lawrence distinguish remittitur of record specifically from remittitur of damages and remittitur of penalty, but not all sources are equally careful. Keyword searching in historical databases on "remittitur" alone will return hits across all three doctrines.
**Modern terminology displacement.** Contemporary federal and state practitioners rarely use the phrase "remittitur of record" as such. The concept survives in the law of appellate mandates, stays pending appeal, and recall of mandate — meaning that modern secondary sources treating this topic will be indexed under different headings. Researchers bridging historical and modern materials must track the conceptual thread across terminological shifts.
**Procedural posture analysis.** In historical litigation records, the date and contents of the remittitur of record may be critical evidence for establishing whether a lower court had subject matter jurisdiction to enter a subsequent order, whether a party was in contempt for acting prematurely, or whether a limitations period was tolled or triggered. These questions arise in both civil and criminal contexts.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Rapalje & Lawrence define remittitur of record as the sending back of the record to the inferior court after a case has been decided on appeal, and note that the term also applies to the document by which this is accomplished. This dual reference — to the act and to the instrument — is characteristic of the older common-law treatment, where procedural formality required a tangible, certifiable writing to accomplish the transfer.
The historical dictionaries do not extensively distinguish remittitur of record from the general appellate mandate in modern terms, because in classical common-law practice the concepts were intertwined: the record was the case, and its physical return was the mechanism of restored lower court authority. Modern practice has largely separated the physical record (now often electronic or retained) from the mandate (the operative appellate instruction), but historical sources treat them as unified.
What historical sources largely omit is any treatment of the strategic and timing dimensions of the remittitur — the question of when counsel could or should seek to expedite or delay the remittitur's issuance. That body of practice is better captured in appellate treatises and procedural manuals of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries than in the law dictionaries of the period.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The terminology is most entrenched in older common-law jurisdictions and in states that followed English appellate practice closely. Modern federal practice uses "mandate" (Fed. R. App. P. 41) rather than "remittitur of record," though the underlying rule — that the lower court's authority to act is restored by the appellate court's formal transmission — is preserved. State practice varies considerably in terminology; some states retain "remittitur" language in their appellate rules, others use "mandate" exclusively.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
For the distinct doctrine of remittitur as a damages-reduction remedy, see: Damages and Remedies in Tort — Remittitur and Additur (The Law Mind Torts & Personal Injury Encyclopedia) [torts_178].
---