Definition
A referee is a person appointed by a court to assist in the resolution of a pending case, typically by taking testimony, examining the parties and witnesses, and reporting findings or conclusions back to the court. The court may then adopt, modify, or reject the referee's report, and judgment may be entered accordingly.
The term carries two distinct legal meanings depending on context:
1. JUDICIAL REFEREE (court-appointed): An officer or designee to whom a court refers a pending action or a specific issue within an action — such as an accounting, a factual inquiry, or a hearing on damages — for examination and report. The referee acts under the court's authority, and the reference is a procedural mechanism within ongoing litigation. The referee does not render a final judgment independently; the court retains ultimate authority to confirm or reject the report.
2. REFEREE AS ARBITRATOR (pre- or extra-judicial): In older usage and some contexts, a referee is a person to whom a dispute is referred by agreement of the parties for settlement, functioning essentially as an arbitrator. In this sense the referee's determination is called an award. Bouvier's definition leans heavily on this meaning. This usage has largely been displaced by the term "arbitrator" in modern practice, though it survives in some statutory schemes.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): An umpire or judge who enforces rules during a game; also, a person who settles a dispute, or someone who vouches for another person (a "reference").
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): One to whom a thing is referred; a person to whom a matter in dispute has been referred in order to settle it.
The sporting sense dominates modern lay understanding — a referee is the official in a football game, boxing match, or basketball court. The legal meaning is narrower and procedurally specific: a referee is not a neutral enforcer of rules in an ongoing contest, but a court-delegated officer performing an investigative or quasi-adjudicative function within civil litigation. A researcher encountering "referee" in legal materials should not carry over the connotation of an impartial real-time arbiter; the judicial referee reports to the court and depends on its confirmation.
---
Common Confusion
REFEREE vs. ARBITRATOR: The two terms are frequently conflated, particularly in older sources. Rapalje & Lawrence draw the distinction cleanly: in ordinary references out of court, the decision-maker is called an arbitrator; the name "referee" is generally reserved for cases where a court refers a question arising in a pending cause. An arbitrator's authority derives from the parties' agreement; a referee's authority derives from the court's order of reference. In Bouvier, the line blurs — Bouvier treats the referee as settling a dispute by award, which is the language of arbitration. Researchers working in 19th-century materials should check which mechanism actually governed the proceeding rather than relying on the label used.
REFEREE vs. MASTER: A referee and a master in chancery (or master of the court) perform overlapping functions and are sometimes used interchangeably in historical sources. In modern federal practice, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 53 governs "masters," and the term "referee" has largely disappeared from federal procedure. State courts vary.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The term "referee" is procedurally dense and its meaning shifts depending on the era and jurisdiction of the source you are reading.
In 19th-century American practice, reference to a referee was a common alternative to jury trial in complex commercial cases — particularly accounting disputes, partnership dissolutions, and cases involving voluminous records. Understanding that a "reference" sent a case to a referee, not to an arbitrator, is essential to reading those dockets correctly.
The distinction between a referee's report and a final judgment matters for res judicata and appellate review analysis. A referee's report that was never confirmed by the court does not carry the same preclusive force as a judgment.
In bankruptcy, "referee in bankruptcy" was the title used under the Bankruptcy Act of 1898 for the judicial officer now called a bankruptcy judge. Sources predating the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 will use this term exclusively. A researcher tracing bankruptcy practice, creditor priorities, or discharge questions through pre-1978 materials must recognize that "referee" in that context means what we now call a bankruptcy judge — an entirely different creature from the litigation-support referee described above.
In family law, many states use "referee" or "hearing officer" for judicial subordinates who handle support, custody, and visitation hearings subject to review by an Article III or equivalent judge. The procedural rights of parties before a referee in this setting — notice, objection, de novo review — vary significantly and can affect the research question.
Corpus researchers should flag that Bouvier's conflation of referee with arbitrator reflects mid-19th-century practice in which the two roles were not always sharply distinguished. Later sources (Black's both editions, Burrill) track the narrowing toward the court-appointed meaning.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The historical dictionaries converge on the court-appointment model as the primary definition. Black's (1st and 2nd editions) and Burrill are nearly identical: a referee is a person to whom a cause pending in court is referred by the court to take testimony, hear the parties, and report back — with judgment entered on a confirmed report. This is procedural, not substantive law.
Bouvier diverges by leading with the dispute-settlement function and characterizing the referee's determination as an "award" — terminology that belongs to arbitration, not to judicial reference. Bouvier then cross-references "Arbitrator" and "Reference," suggesting awareness of the overlap but not fully resolving it. This reflects Bouvier's tendency to synthesize equity and common law practice under unified headings.
Rapalje & Lawrence provide the most analytically useful entry. They explicitly acknowledge that "referee" and "arbitrator" are used in overlapping contexts but attempt to draw a functional line: arbitrator for out-of-court private references, referee for court-ordered ones. They also note that the court may refer questions arising in a cause or matter — signaling that the reference need not be of the whole case but can be limited to a discrete issue.
None of the historical dictionaries address the bankruptcy referee specifically, which is a significant omission given how central that office became to American practice from 1898 onward.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Federal courts have largely replaced "referee" with "master" (governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 53) and "magistrate judge" for non-Article III judicial functions. State courts vary considerably: New York retains a formal referee system used in mortgage foreclosures and accounting proceedings; California uses "discovery referee" and "settlement referee" as recognized procedural roles. Researchers working across jurisdictions should not assume uniform procedure.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
See Law Mind Encyclopedia: Reference and Referees in Civil Procedure; Bankruptcy Referee (Historical); Arbitration and Reference Distinguished.
---