Definition
In commercial law, a redraft is a new bill of exchange drawn at the place where the original bill was made payable and where it was dishonored and protested, drawn upon the place where the original bill was first drawn. The purpose is to reimburse the holder for the amount of the protested bill plus associated costs — protest fees, damages, and charges of re-exchange — by routing a new instrument back through commercial channels to the drawer or endorsers liable on the original.
Where no regular commercial intercourse exists between the place of protest and the place of original drawing, the redraft is drawn through the next best or most direct practicable commercial route.
The redraft is the instrument through which the law of re-exchange operates: it is how a holder who cannot recover directly translates the protested bill's value into a new, enforceable claim.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): To draft again; to produce a revised version of a document.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): To draft or draw anew.
The ordinary English meaning — revising any written document — has almost nothing in common with the legal commercial-law meaning. In legal usage, a redraft is not a revised document at all. It is a specific financial instrument: a new bill of exchange with a defined route, purpose, and cost structure, triggered by protest of an original bill. Researchers encountering "redraft" in historical commercial records or pleadings should not assume the general sense of revision.
---
Common Confusion
REDRAFT is frequently conflated with RE-EXCHANGE. They are related but distinct. Re-exchange is the right or the damages — the legal entitlement of a holder of a dishonored foreign bill to recover the costs of returning value to the place of drawing. The redraft is the instrument through which that right is exercised. Bouvier's entry for REDRAFT correctly points researchers to RE-EXCHANGE as the governing doctrine; the redraft is its mechanical execution. A researcher finding "re-exchange" in a treatise and "redraft" in a record is likely looking at two sides of the same transaction.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Redraft is a term almost entirely confined to historical commercial law. It appears in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century materials dealing with foreign bills of exchange, protest, and the costs of dishonor. Researchers working in that period — particularly in mercantile litigation, banking records, or early commercial treatises — need to understand that a redraft is not merely a corrected document but a new negotiable instrument with its own formal requirements and a specific directional logic (from place of protest back toward place of drawing).
The corpus of historical legal materials contains only sparse treatment of this term. Black's (1st ed.) entry is notably truncated — the text breaks off mid-sentence with a fragment about a deed and a disease, a clear artifact of compilation error or typographical corruption in the source. Researchers should not treat that entry as complete. Black's (2nd ed.) supplies the complete definition and is the authoritative version among the shelf sources here.
The term virtually disappears from twentieth-century legal dictionaries because the legal and commercial infrastructure that gave rise to it — foreign bills of exchange drawn across jurisdictions with varying commercial intercourse, formal protest procedures as the trigger for secondary liability — was substantially displaced by wire transfers, modern banking instruments, and the Uniform Commercial Code. Finding "redraft" in a twentieth-century legal document without commercial context should prompt scrutiny: it may be used in the lay sense of document revision.
The citation shared across the historical sources — 1 Bell, Commentaries on the Law of Scotland (406) — is the common authoritative anchor for this definition. Researchers encountering the term in Scottish or Scottish-influenced commercial law contexts will find Bell directly relevant.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
All four shelf sources are in substantive agreement. Bouvier and Black's (2nd ed.) offer the fullest definitions, both tracking the Bell formulation closely. Rapalje & Lawrence is characteristically spare — "a second bill of exchange" — which is accurate in its brevity but strips out the directional and contextual requirements that make the instrument legally meaningful.
The shelf sources unanimously treat redraft as a commercial law term only. None extends the definition to document revision or any other context, which confirms that the legal meaning was understood as distinct and technical throughout the nineteenth century.
What the historical sources do not address: the procedural mechanics of drawing a redraft, the calculation of re-exchange costs included in it, or the rules governing endorser liability on the new instrument. For those questions, Bell's Commentaries and contemporaneous treatises on bills of exchange (Byles, Chitty) are the necessary next stop.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Redraft as a formal commercial instrument was a feature of both English and Scottish mercantile law, with Bell's Commentaries supplying the shared definitional foundation. American commercial law absorbed the concept through early mercantile practice but it was never prominently codified in American statutes. The UCC does not use the term.
---