it; and is now uniformly applied where a man brings an action for breach of a contract between him and the defendant; and where the latter can show that some stipulation in the same contract was made by the plaintiff, which he has violated, the defendant may, if he choose, instead of suing in his turn, recoupe his damages arising from the breach committed by the plaintiff, whether they be liquidated or not. Ives v. Van Eppes, 22 Wend. (N. Y.) 156. And see Barber v. Chapin, 28 Vt. 413; Lawton v. Ricketts, 104 Ala. 430, 16 South. 59; Aultman y. Torrey ov Minn. 492, 57 N. W. 211; Dietrich y. Ely, 63 Fed. 413,11 C. GC. A 266; The Wellsville v. Geissie, 3 Ohio St. 341; Nichols v. Dusenbury, 2 N. Y. 286; Myers v. Estell, 47 Miss. 23. In speaking of matters to be shown in defense, the term “recoupment” is‘often used as synonymous with “reduction.” The term is of rench origin, and signifies cutting again, or cutting back, and, as a defense, means the cutting back on the plaintiff's claim by the defendant. Like reduction, it is of necessity limited to the amount of the plaintiff’s claim. It is properly applicable to a case where the same contract imposes mutual duties and obligations on the two parties, and one seeks a remedy for the breach of duty by the second, and the second meets the demand by a claim for the breach of er A the first. Davenport v. Hubbard, 46 Vt. », 14 Am. Rep. 620. “Recoupment’” differs from “set-off” in this respect: that any claim or demand the defendant may have against the plaintiff may be used as a set-off, while it is nut a subject for recoupment unless it grows out of the very same transaction which furnishes the plaintiff's cuuse of action. The term Is, as appears above, synonymous with “reduction ;” but the latter is not a technical term of the law; the word “defalcation,” in one of its meanings, expresses the same idea, and is used interchangeably with recoupment. Ke coupment, as a remedy, corresponds to the reconvention of the civil law. In its most extensive sense, a recovery is the restoration or vindication of a right existing in a person, by the formal judgment or decree of a competent court, at his instance and suit, or the obtaining, by such judgment, of some right or propercy which has been taken or withheld from him This is also called a “true” recovery, to dis- tinguish it from a “feigned” or een recovery. See CoMMON RECOVERY. —Final recovery. The final judgment in an action. Also the final verdict in an action, as oe uence from the judgment entered upon isk v. Gray, 100 Mass. 193; Count Todahes v. Pangborn, 6 Allen (Mass.) 343.