Definition
A Latin term appearing in conveyancing and pleading contexts, meaning "to be received" or "that which is to be received." In legal usage, *recipiendum* functions most commonly as a gerundive form in phrases describing what is to be taken, accepted, or received — whether a payment, a conveyance, or testimony. It does not denote a freestanding legal doctrine but appears as a component of formal Latin legal phrases, particularly in older English and American pleading forms where Latin phrases governed procedural and conveyancing language.
The term is closely associated with clauses in deeds and instruments that identify the consideration or thing passing to the grantee, and with testimonial formulas describing evidence to be received or admitted.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encounter *recipiendum* almost exclusively in pre-twentieth-century sources — English chancery records, colonial and early American conveyancing forms, and Latin-heavy pleading manuals. It rarely appears as a standalone headword in legal dictionaries, which means researchers who encounter it in a primary source may not locate it under its own entry. Instead, they should look to entries for related conveyancing clauses (HABENDUM, TENENDUM) or to Latin phrase indexes in treatises on pleading and evidence.
The practical trap: *recipiendum* surfaces embedded in longer Latin formulae, and its meaning shifts slightly depending on context. In a conveyancing instrument, it describes something to be received by the grantee. In an evidentiary or procedural context, it may describe testimony or proof that a court is to receive. A researcher who reads only one context risks misreading the term in the other.
The absence of a dedicated entry in both Bouvier and Rapalje & Lawrence is itself informative. Neither dictionary treats *recipiendum* as a term requiring independent definition, placing it among the class of Latin gerundives that functioned as building blocks of larger phrases rather than as legally operative terms in their own right. Researchers working in English equity practice or early American common law pleading will find the term most frequently in Latin maxim collections, form books, and treatise footnotes rather than in reported opinions.
Because Law Mind's corpus includes early conveyancing materials and Latin pleading forms, *recipiendum* is most productively searched in conjunction with surrounding phrase fragments. A search for the term in isolation may return sparse results; a search embedded in its typical phrase context will yield more.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Neither Bouvier's Law Dictionary nor Rapalje & Lawrence provides a direct entry for *recipiendum*. The source material provided under this term for both dictionaries returns entries for unrelated headwords — Bouvier addresses HABENDUM and its conveyancing function; Rapalje & Lawrence addresses the maxim *habemus optimum testem confitentem reum* in an evidentiary context. This absence is consistent with the term's status as a subordinate Latin element rather than an independent legal concept.
Bouvier's treatment of HABENDUM is contextually relevant: his explanation that the habendum clause "defines the extent of the ownership in the thing granted to be held and enjoyed by grantee" gestures toward the same conveyancing architecture in which *recipiendum* appears. The habendum clause establishes what is to be had (*habendum*); associated gerundives like *recipiendum* appear in phrases identifying what is to be received in return or by whom. The two function within the same formal vocabulary of Latin conveyancing.
Rapalje & Lawrence's evidentiary entry, though unrelated in subject matter, illustrates how Latin gerundive constructions operated in legal argument — phrases like *confitentem reum* (confessing defendant) worked as compressed doctrinal statements. *Recipiendum* functions analogously: compressed, relational, and dependent on surrounding text for its full legal meaning.
Historical dictionaries generally treat Latin gerundives in one of two ways: as components of maxims (indexed under the maxim's operative noun) or as elements of form-book clauses (unremarked upon because assumed knowledge). Neither approach produces a clean dictionary entry for *recipiendum*, which is why researchers should expect to work laterally through related entries rather than searching for the term directly.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The term belongs to the Latin-language stratum of English common law and equity practice, transplanted into American legal usage through colonial-era forms. Its appearance in American sources declines sharply after the mid-nineteenth century as code pleading replaced common law pleading forms and Latin was progressively displaced from conveyancing instruments.
---