ing, advising, or assisting in the commission of a crime. Each person present consenting to the commission of the offense, and doing any act which is either an ingredient in the crime or immediately connected with or leading to its commission.1 A principal in the first degree is he that is the actor or absolute perpetrator of the crime. A principal in the second degree is he who is present, aiding and abetting the Primæ impressionis. Of the first imfact to be done.2 pression, q. υ. In treason and trespasses all participants are prinPRINCIPAL.4 Leading; highest in imcipals. See further ACCESSARY; AID, 1; PRESENCE. portance. See PRIMARY. 1. The original debt or sum loaned: as, in principal and interest. See INTEREST, 2 (3). 2. The more worthy; opposed to accessory, appurtenant, incident, secondary, inferior, qq. v. Applied to estates, rights, and obligations. See CHALLENGE, 4. 3. The person primarily liable; the original debtor; opposed to bail, surety, qq. v. 4. The employer of an agent or attorney; opposed to agent, q. v. One primarily and ordinarily concerned, and who is not an accessary or auxiliary; as, the person receiving goods or employing workmen for his own advantage. An "agent" is a person employed to manage the affairs of another; as, he who receives or employs workmen for another. Vice-principal. A servant to whom his master deputes general supervision of his work, with the power of appointment and dismissal; a deputy master. Especially is he a vice-principal who is engaged to manage a business distinct from the principal's regular occupation. The word "manager," as a synonym, is somewhat ambiguous. See MANAGER, 1. 5. The chief actor in a crime; opposed to accessary. Either the chief actor, that is, the actual perpetrator of the crime, or else he is present aiding and abetting the fact to be done.7 One present, consenting, aiding, procurTroy v. Evans, 97 U. S. 3 (1877); ib. 267, cases. • Collins v. Gilbert, 94 U. S. 754 (1876), cases. • Commissioners v. Clark, 94 U. S. 285 (1876), cases. L. principalis, taking the first place; chief. * [Adams v. Whittlesey, 3 Conn. 567 (1821), Hosmer, Chief Justice. • Murphy v. Smith, 19 C. B. N. S. *366 (1865); Gallagher v. Piper, 16 id. *669 (1864); Dwyer v. American Express Co., 55 Wis. 456 (1882); Foley v. Chicago, &c. R. Co., 64 Iowa, 650 (1884); 1 Shearm. & R. Neg. §§ 23031 (1888). [1 Hale, Pl. Cr. 615, 618. jury that the will was so read, or that the contents were known to the testator.¹ 2. In ancient pleading, see OYER. 1. Taking or accepting a thing delivered, usually money, but may be any personalty. Receipts: moneys received. See EARNINGS. 2. Such written acknowledgment by one person of his having received money from another as will be prima facie evidence of that fact in a court of law.4 An acknowledgment of payment or delivery. May contain a contract to perform something in relation to the thing delivered. Receipt in full. A payment of money, or a delivery of other property, in complete discharge of a demand. Receipt on account. A payment or delivery of money or other property in part fulfillment of a contract. Simple receipt. A bare acknowledgment of the payment of money, or of the delivery of personal property of any kind, to the person who signs the receipt. A receipt in full operates to defeat any further claim for a debt, unless it was obtained under such circumstances of mistake, accident, surprise, or fraud as would authorize a court of equity to set it aside. A receipt which simply acknowledges a payment or delivery is prima facie, not conclusive, evidence of the 1 [3 Bl. Com. 310. 2 Fain v. Cornett, 25 Ga. 186 (1858). 3[3 Steph. Com. 539; People v. Page, 1 Idaho, 194 (1868). 4 Kegg v. State, 10 Ohio, 79 (1840), Grimke, J. 5 The Missouri v. Webb, 9 Mo. 194 (1845). • Aborn v. Rathbone, 54 Conn. 446 (1887).