Definition
A railroad company is a business entity — whether incorporated or, in some contexts, a natural person — organized to construct, own, operate, or maintain a railroad, including the tracks, rolling stock, stations, and related infrastructure used for the transportation of passengers or freight by rail. The term encompasses both privately held and publicly chartered enterprises and has historically been a distinct category of regulated entity under state and federal law.
In its broadest regulatory usage, the term is not limited to corporations. Courts and legislatures have recognized that a natural person operating a railroad may fall within the definition for purposes of licensing, safety regulation, and liability.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): A company that operates a railroad, typically a large incorporated enterprise engaged in rail transport of goods or people.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "A corporation owning or operating a railroad."
The legal definition departs from the popular one in a significant way: ordinary usage assumes corporate form, while regulatory statutes and courts have consistently extended the term to cover any operator of a railroad regardless of legal structure. A researcher applying the common meaning to a historical police-power statute may incorrectly exclude individual proprietors or partnerships from the regulated class.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The term "railroad company" functions as a term of art in three overlapping legal domains: corporate law, common carrier liability, and regulatory/administrative law. These domains developed along different tracks and do not always use the term identically.
In corporate law, railroad companies occupied a singular position in 19th- and early 20th-century American law. State legislatures granted charters to railroad corporations with specific powers — eminent domain, rights-of-way, capitalization authority — that were unavailable to ordinary business corporations. Researchers reading pre-1900 sources should not assume that general corporation law applied to railroad companies; special railroad corporation acts frequently governed and displaced general statutes.
In common carrier liability, the railroad company is the paradigmatic common carrier. Duties of reasonable care for passengers, strict or near-strict liability for freight loss, and the non-delegable duty rule all developed largely through railroad litigation. Research into carrier liability doctrine must trace this railroad-specific heritage before applying it to other modes of transport.
In regulatory law, the definitional question of who qualifies as a railroad company is not academic. State police statutes, hours-of-service laws, safety regulations, and rate schedules all turned on whether an entity fell within the definition. Bouvier's note — that the term encompasses natural persons operating a railroad — reflects a real doctrinal dispute about whether individual operators could evade regulatory burdens by avoiding corporate form. Researchers consulting state-level regulatory records should check whether the governing statute was construed broadly or narrowly on this point.
The Anderson's entry as preserved is fragmentary and appears to preserve complaint-form boilerplate rather than a substantive definitional entry. This is a known limitation of Anderson's for certain terms; its value here is essentially nil as a doctrinal source, and researchers should rely on Bouvier's and primary sources instead.
Jurisdictional variation in the definition matters most at the administrative law level. The Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) operated under a federal statutory definition; state public utility commissions operated under their own. An entity might qualify as a railroad company under one regime but not another.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier's brief note — that the term as used in a state police statute includes natural persons operating a railroad — reflects a consistent judicial tendency to give regulatory statutes their broadest operative reach. The principle behind this is functional: regulation aimed at rail safety and service does not serve its purpose if it can be defeated by operating outside corporate form.
Anderson's entry for this term is not usable as a substantive legal definition. The preserved text is complaint-form boilerplate — procedural language for a regulatory proceeding before a commission — with no definitional content. Researchers should treat Anderson's as silent on this term.
Neither historical dictionary addresses the evolution from special charter corporations to general incorporation, the emergence of railroad holding companies, or federal regulatory displacement of state definitions after the Interstate Commerce Act (1887) and its amendments. These are significant gaps. A researcher relying solely on these sources would have an incomplete picture of how the entity category was defined and regulated across different eras.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Federal and state definitions of "railroad company" diverged significantly in the regulatory era. Federal law under the Interstate Commerce Act reached interstate carriers; state commissions retained authority over intrastate operations, often under different definitional standards. Some states defined the term to include street railways and interurbans; others excluded them. Researchers working on pre-1940 regulatory materials should identify the specific governing statute and its judicial construction before applying any general definition.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Torts & Personal Injury Encyclopedia — Motor Vehicle and Transportation Torts: Common Carrier Liability (Airlines, Railroads, Buses): Primary reference for railroad company liability to passengers and freight shippers, duty of care standards, and the carrier relationship.
The Law Mind Business Organizations & Corporate Law Encyclopedia — Special Topics: Investment Companies and the Investment Company Act of 1940: Relevant when researching railroad holding structures and whether rail enterprises triggered investment company registration requirements.
---