Definition
A Latin phrase from medieval English conveyancing meaning "to quitclaim" — that is, to formally renounce all claims, pretensions of right, and title to a piece of land or other property. The term appears in old deed formulas by which a grantor declared that they, and their heirs, would make no further assertion of ownership or interest in the subject property. It is the operative verbal form underlying the noun "quitclaim" and is closely associated with the deed of release by which one party discharged another from any claim the first might otherwise pursue.
The phrase is not a cause of action or a judicial remedy. It is a term of art from the drafting vocabulary of medieval conveyancers, signifying the act of relinquishment itself.
---
Common Confusion
QUIETE CLAMARE is frequently encountered alongside its variant form QUIETUM CLAMARE. The two express the same legal act; the difference is grammatical. Quiete clamare is the infinitive construction ("to quitclaim quietly" or "to renounce quietly"), while quietum clamare reflects the accusative or participial form used in formal deed recitals, particularly as employed by Fleta, Littleton, and Coke. Researchers encountering either form in historical sources should treat them as functionally equivalent. Neither should be confused with the modern action for quiet title, which is a judicial proceeding to resolve competing claims to property — a different mechanism entirely, though it shares the same root concept of silencing adverse claims.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working in early English land records, medieval plea rolls, or treatises on real property conveyancing will encounter quiete clamare (or quietum clamare) as part of standard deed language rather than as a term of litigation. Its significance is primarily documentary: identifying this phrase in a historical instrument signals that the grantor was executing a quitclaim rather than a warranty deed, meaning the grantor gave up whatever interest they had without promising to defend the title against third-party claims.
Two research traps are worth flagging. First, the visual and phonetic similarity to "quiet enjoyment" and "quiet title" can mislead researchers into treating these as related doctrines rather than historically distinct concepts. Quiet enjoyment is a covenant running with a lease or conveyance; quiet title is a modern equitable action; quiete clamare is a deed formula expressing voluntary renunciation. They share ancestry in the idea of silencing adverse claims but operate in entirely different legal contexts.
Second, the phrase drops out of practical use after the formalization and eventual statutory simplification of conveyancing in England and the United States. Researchers tracing the history of quitclaim deeds into the nineteenth and twentieth centuries will find quiete clamare and quietum clamare only in treatises and legal dictionaries looking backward — the live deed language had already transitioned to vernacular equivalents. American practice retains the functional concept in the quitclaim deed but shed the Latin formula entirely. Sources after roughly the mid-nineteenth century that use the phrase are almost certainly citing it historically.
Corpus connections: this term links naturally to the history of release deeds, the law of warranties of title, and the distinction between quitclaim and warranty conveyances. It also appears in discussions of Bracton, Fleta, and Littleton as primary sources for early conveyancing practice.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The four source dictionaries agree on the core meaning without meaningful divergence: quiete clamare means to quitclaim or renounce all pretension of right and title. All four cite Bracton as authority, with Black's (both editions) and Rapalje & Lawrence pointing specifically to Bracton fols. 1 and 5.
Burrill adds the most substantive content, noting that quietum clamare — the variant form — was used by Fleta, Littleton, and Coke, and supplying a partial specimen of actual deed language: "Noverint universi per præsentes me, A. de B. remisisse, relaxasse, et omnino de me et heredibus meis quietum clamasse C. de D. totum jus..." ("Know all men by these presents, that I, A. of B., have remised, released, and altogether quitclaimed from me and my heirs to C. of D. all right..."). This formula is valuable for researchers who need to recognize the phrase in manuscript or printed sources, as it shows the term embedded in the broader boilerplate of the medieval quitclaim deed.
Rapalje & Lawrence adds a cross-reference to the covenant of quietly entering, holding, and enjoying, citing 11 East 633 — a link that gestures toward the downstream doctrinal connection between the act of quitclaiming and the covenant of quiet enjoyment, though these remained conceptually distinct.
What the historical dictionaries do not address is the procedural or evidentiary significance of these instruments in land dispute litigation, nor the transition from Latin deed formulas to English equivalents. Researchers seeking that history will need to look beyond the dictionary shelf to treatises on conveyancing and the history of real property law.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Quiete clamare and quietum clamare are exclusively historical — they belong to English law before the standardization and eventual simplification of conveyancing. American jurisdictions inherited the quitclaim deed concept but never adopted the Latin formula in domestic practice. No meaningful jurisdictional variation exists because the term itself is not operative in any current legal system.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Law Mind Real Estate Transactions & Construction Encyclopedia: "Title Defects and Curative Actions — Quiet Title, Affidavits, and Corrective Instruments"
The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia: "Landlord-Tenant — Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment"
---