Definition
Quare obstruaxit (Latin: "wherefore he obstructed") is an obsolete writ in old English common law procedure. It lay in favor of a person who held a right of way or liberty of passage through another's land and found that passage unlawfully blocked or obstructed by the landowner or a third party. The writ directed the defendant to appear and show cause why he had obstructed the plaintiff's established right of passage.
The writ belonged to the family of quare writs — procedural instruments framed as direct complaints against specific wrongful acts, structured around the question "wherefore did the defendant do X?" It was a remedy of specific application: where a recognized right of passage existed and that right was physically impeded.
---
Common Confusion
Quare obstruaxit should not be confused with quare impedit, another quare writ that addressed obstruction of a right to present to a church living (advowson), nor with the action on the case for nuisance, which became the dominant remedy for interference with easements and rights of way as the common law writ system gave way to more flexible pleading forms. The specific writ of quare obstruaxit fell into disuse well before the abolition of the forms of action, absorbed functionally by nuisance and related actions.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This term is essentially a historical artifact. Researchers will encounter quare obstruaxit almost exclusively in pre-modern English legal materials — abridgments, registers of writs, early treatise literature, and year book era sources. It will not appear in American practice and has no modern procedural analog by name.
The chief research trap is treating this writ as a general remedy for obstruction of any right. The writ was narrow: it required that the plaintiff hold an existing, recognized liberty or right of passage — not a mere claimed or contested right. The obstruction complained of had to interfere with that established entitlement. Researchers working with medieval or early modern English property disputes should note that the right of passage underlying the writ would typically have been granted by deed or recognized by long custom, making the writ closely tied to the history of easements and profits in English land law.
Because the quare writs as a class were formulaic, finding quare obstruaxit in a historical register or abridgment tells a researcher something precise: the plaintiff was asserting an already-established right, not seeking to create or define one. This distinguishes it from a boundary dispute action or a trespass quare clausum fregit, where the nature of the right itself might be contested.
Researchers tracing the development of easement law and the law of private ways in England will find the writ's existence and eventual obsolescence instructive. As equity and then the action on the case for nuisance expanded, the rigid writ structure became unnecessary for protecting passage rights.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) defines the writ as lying "for one who, having a liberty to pass through his neighbor's ground, could [not do so by reason of the obstruction]." The entry is fragmentary in available form but is consistent with the writ's known structure in older English sources. Black's treatment is brief, reflecting the writ's purely historical status by the time of publication — it merited inclusion as a term researchers might encounter in old materials, not as a term of living practice.
Historical dictionaries and abridgments of English law, including Rastell and Fitzherbert's registers of writs, catalogued quare obstruaxit among the specialized quare writs addressing interference with established rights. These sources confirm the writ's dependency on a pre-existing right of passage rather than a claim to establish one. What historical sources largely omit is any sustained analysis of how the writ was displaced — that story is told not in dictionary entries but in the gradual expansion of nuisance doctrine and the reform literature leading to the Common Law Procedure Acts.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Quare obstruaxit was exclusively an English common law writ and was never transplanted into American practice. American courts developing easement and right-of-way protections worked through trespass, nuisance, and later injunctive relief. No American jurisdiction recognized this writ.
---