Definition
Quare intrusit (sometimes rendered "quare intravit") was a common law writ available to a feudal lord against a ward who had rejected a marriage proffered by the lord, entered the ward's own lands, and married another person without the lord's consent — without having satisfied the lord for the value of the marriage. The writ was a remedy for the lord's loss of the valuable incident known as "marriage" (maritagium), a feudal right entitling the guardian to arrange and profit from the ward's marriage. Upon the ward's refusal and self-arranged marriage, the lord's financial interest in the marriage went uncompensated, and this writ provided the mechanism to recover that value. The writ was abolished by the Statute of 12 Charles II, c. 24 (the Tenures Abolition Act 1660), which dismantled the system of military tenures and the feudal incidents attached to them.
---
Common Confusion
Quare intrusit is easily confused with other writs in the quare family, particularly quare impedit (a writ concerning disturbance of a right of advowson, i.e., the right to present a clergyman to a benefice) and quare ejecit infra terminum (a writ for a termor ousted before expiration of a lease). These writs share Latin construction and a common origin in the Register of Writs but address entirely distinct grievances. Quare intrusit is specifically tied to the feudal incident of marriage and has no application outside that context. Researchers encountering any "quare" writ in historical records should identify the specific wrong alleged before drawing comparisons across entries.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Quare intrusit is an essentially extinct writ with no modern procedural life. Its research significance is almost entirely historical and contextual. Researchers working in English legal history prior to 1660 — particularly in records touching feudal tenure, wardship, or the Court of Wards — may encounter this writ in plea rolls, register entries, or treatise discussions. A few points of navigational importance:
The writ sits within the broader system of feudal incidents abolished by 12 Car. II, c. 24. Any research into quare intrusit must be grounded in an understanding of that system: wardship, marriage as a property right, and the lord-ward relationship that flowed from military tenure by knight's service. Without that context, the writ's purpose and the nature of the lord's grievance will appear opaque.
The term "marriage" as a feudal incident does not mean the ceremony itself but rather the lord's right to present a suitable match and to receive a payment (the "value of the marriage") in connection with the ward's marriage. This technical meaning diverges sharply from modern usage and from the lay reading a researcher might bring to older sources. See MARRIAGE, FEUDAL INCIDENT in related terms.
Quare intrusit appears sparingly in the historical dictionaries and treatises, which generally treat it as a footnote within the wardship system rather than as a standalone subject. Bracton, Glanvill, and Littleton address the underlying incidents; Fitzherbert's Natura Brevium and the Register of Writs are the more direct sources for the writ form itself.
For corpus researchers: if this term appears in a document, the document almost certainly predates 1660, and the legal relationship at issue involves feudal tenure rather than contract or modern family law. It is a reliable dating signal and a marker of the feudal common law world.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) provides the core definition concisely: the writ lay where a lord proffered a suitable marriage to his ward, the ward rejected it, entered the lands, and married another without satisfying the lord for the value of the marriage. Black's correctly identifies the abolishing statute as 12 Car. II, c. 24.
The entry is brief and accurate as far as it goes, but it does not situate the writ within the broader wardship system, nor does it explain the nature of "the value of the marriage" as a quantifiable feudal incident — essentially a sum the lord was owed either in compensation for the match forgone or as a penalty for the ward's unilateral action. Historical readers unfamiliar with feudal tenure law will find Black's definition technically correct but contextually thin.
No significant divergence appears across the narrow historical dictionary record for this term, which reflects its highly specialized and long-obsolete character. Earlier English legal dictionaries such as Rastell and Termes de la Ley treat similar feudal writs but the specific entry for quare intrusit is not richly represented in the surviving dictionary tradition, reinforcing that it was a narrow, situational remedy rather than a workhorse writ of common law practice.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Quare intrusit was a writ of English common law with no American reception. The feudal tenure system from which it arose was explicitly rejected in the American colonies and was never part of American property law in any operative sense. The writ has no jurisdictional relevance outside pre-1660 English legal history.
---