PUNCTURED WOUND

4 definitions found across Law Mind sources

PUNCTURED WOUNDAuthored
The Law Mind • 730 words
Definition
In medical jurisprudence, a punctured wound is a wound caused by the insertion of an instrument or object with a sharp point into the body. The wound channel is typically deeper than it is wide, distinguishing it from cuts or lacerations produced by bladed or blunt instruments. The term is treated in legal sources as functionally synonymous with a stab wound.
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): A wound produced by a pointed object that pierces the skin and underlying tissue, creating a small entry point relative to wound depth. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Not distinctly defined as a standalone entry; "puncture" is defined as a hole or wound made by a sharp-pointed instrument. The common and legal meanings are closely aligned. The legal significance lies not in the definition itself but in its evidentiary and classificatory function: in medical jurisprudence, identifying a wound as "punctured" establishes the likely class of instrument used, which bears directly on questions of intent, manner of death, and the identification of a murder weapon.
Common Confusion
PUNCTURED WOUND vs. INCISED WOUND vs. LACERATION: These three categories of wound are frequently collapsed in non-specialist sources but carry distinct meanings in forensic and legal contexts. An incised wound (cut) is longer than it is deep, produced by a sharp edge rather than a point. A laceration is a tearing of tissue, typically caused by blunt force, with irregular margins. A punctured wound is deeper than wide, produced by a pointed instrument. Mischaracterizing the wound type in testimony or pleadings can affect conclusions about the instrument used and, in criminal proceedings, whether the act was deliberate or incidental.
Why It Matters in Research
This is a term of art from medical jurisprudence, not general legal doctrine. Researchers will encounter it primarily in criminal law contexts — homicide, assault, and coroner's inquest records — where the nature of a wound bears on the charge or verdict. The classification of a wound as punctured, incised, or lacerated was a standard analytical framework in nineteenth- and early twentieth-century forensic medicine and appears regularly in trial transcripts, medical examiner reports, and treatises on medical jurisprudence from that period. The term appears in legal dictionaries because courts relied on forensic medical testimony to establish facts about how a wound was inflicted and with what type of instrument. Identifying a wound as a punctured wound supported inferences about premeditation (a pointed weapon suggests deliberate arming) and excluded accidental causes more consistent with blunt trauma. Researchers working in historical criminal records should be aware that the vocabulary of wound classification was not always used consistently by lay witnesses, coroners, or even early physicians. A witness describing a "stab wound" and a surgeon testifying to a "punctured wound" may be describing the same injury. Cross-referencing lay testimony against medical testimony in the same record is essential. The term is also relevant in civil contexts — personal injury actions and early workers' compensation cases — where the character of an injury determined liability theories or insurance coverage.
Historical Dictionary Support
All four source dictionaries agree on the core definition: a wound made by an object with a sharp point, functionally equivalent to a stab. Black's (both editions) and Bouvier's are nearly identical in phrasing. Burrill adds a citation to Taylor's Medical Jurisprudence, the leading nineteenth-century forensic medicine treatise in common law jurisdictions, signaling that the definition was drawn directly from medical science rather than developed independently by courts. The consistency across dictionaries reflects the fact that this term entered legal dictionaries as borrowed medical vocabulary, not as a concept shaped by litigation. None of the historical sources discuss doctrinal elaboration or case law development around the term itself — it functions as a classification tool, not a legal standard. One note of caution: the Bouvier's entry in the source material contains an interpolated passage on punctuation in the construction of statutes and deeds. This is an artifact of alphabetical proximity in the original volume and has no bearing on the definition of punctured wound.
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
See Law Mind Encyclopedia: Medical Jurisprudence; Homicide — Evidence and Proof
Related Terms
Incised wound | Laceration | Contusion | Stab wound | Medical jurisprudence | Cause of death | Manner of death | Coroner's inquest | Wound (general)
PUNCTURED WOUNDmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
In medical jurisprudence. A wound made by the inser- tion into the body of any instrument having a sharp point. The term is practically syn- onymous with "stab."
PUNCTURED WOUNDmain
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910
In medical jurisprudence. A wound made by the insertion into the body of any instrument having a sharp point. The term is practically synonymous with “stab.”
PUNCTURED WOUNDmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
written or printed instrument by means of points, such as the comma, semicolon, and the like. Courts of law in construing statutes and deeds must read them with such punctua- tion as will give effect to the whole; 4 Terın 65. In construing deeds, it is said that no re- gard is to be had to punctuation, and although stops are sometimes used, they are not to be regarded in the construction of the instrument: 3 Washb. R. P. 397. See 21 W. Va. 707. Punctuation is not allowed to throw light on printed statutes in England; 24 Beav. 330. In an act of parliament there are no such things as brackets, any more than there are such things as stops; 24 Q. B. D. 478. Punctuation may be considered in deter- mining the meaning of a contract, when it is doubtful; 138 U. S. 1. Where a comma after a word in a statute, if any force were attached to it, would give the section containing it broader scope than it would otherwise have, it was held that that circumstance should not have a controlling influence. Punctuation is no part of the statute; 105 U. S. 77; in construing statutes, courts will disregard punctuation; or, if need be, repunctuate, to render the true meaning of the statute; 16 Ohio St. 432, approved in 105 U. S. 77; also 65 Pa. 311; 9 Gray 385. Punctuation is a most fallible standard by which to interpret a writing; it may be resorted to when all other means fail, but the court will first ascertain the mean- ing from the four corners of the instru- ment; 11 Pet. 64. Lord St. Leonards said: "In wills and deeds you do not ordinarily find any stops; but the court reads them as if they were properly punctuated;" 2 Dr. & War. 98. Judges in the later cases have been influ- enced in construing wills by the punctua- tion of the original document; 2 M. & G. 679; 26 Beav. 81; 1 Phila. 528; 17 Beav. 589; 24 L. J. Ch. 523; but see 1 Mer. 651, where Sir William Grant refused to resort to punctuation as an aid to construction. See, also, 25 Barb. 405; 16 Can. L. J. 183.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In