(1033) PROVISO, (when does not create a condition). if the provocation was at an end, the 1 Cro. 73. (in an agreement). 1 Lev. 155. (in a bond). 2 Mod. 36. (in a mortgage deed). 2 Munf. (Va.) 337; 2 Co. 70; Yelv. 206. (in a lease). 3 Wheel. Am. C. L. 191; 1 Cro. 242; Dyer 150a. (in a marriage settlement). 1 Keb. (in a statute). 15 Pet. (U.S.) 165, 423; 58 Ala. 396, 401; 4 Johns. (N. Y.) 304; 1 Hen. & M. (Va.) 341. 842, 860. (in a will). 1 Dyer 3b.. Proviso est providere præsentia et futura non præterita (Co.72): A proviso is to provide for the present or future, not the past. PROVISO, TRIAL BY.-In the English practice, where the plaintiff after issue joined, did not proceed to trial where he ought to have done so, the defendant might, under the old praetice, have the action tried by proviso; he might give the plaintiff notice of trial, make up the record, carry it down and enter it, and proceed to the trial as if he were proceeding as plaintiff. This could be done only in cases where the plaintiff had been guilty of some laches or default after issue joined, except in replevin, proor hibition, quare impedit, error in fact; in which cases, both parties being plaintiffs, the defendant might make up the record, and thereupon proceed to trial, although no laches default were imputable to the plaintiff. By rule 42 Н. Т. 1853, "no trial by proviso shall be allowed in the same term in which the default of the plaintiff has been made, and no rule for a trial by proviso shall be necessary." By C. L. P. Act, 1852, 2 116, nothing shall affect the right of a defendant to take down a cause for trial after default by the plaintiff; and if records are entered for trial both by the plaintiff and the defendant, the defendant's record shall be treated as standing next in order after the plaintiff's record in the list of causes. A defendant was seldom tried by proviso, as the better course was to take proceedings under the C. L. P. Act, 1852, 2 101. (2 Chit. Arch. Pr. (12 edit.) 1492.) Under the new practice of the Judicature Acts, if the plaintiff does not within six weeks after the close of the pleadings, or within such extended time as a court or judge may allow, give notice of trial, the defendant may, before notice of trial given by the plaintiff, give notice of trial and thereby specify a mode of trial, and in such case the plaintiff, on giving notice within four days or such extended time as a court or judge may allow, that he desires to have the issues of fact tried before a judge and jury, shall be entitled to have the same so tried. (Jud. Act, 1875, Ord. xxxvi., r. 4; see, also, rr. 2 and 3.) - Wharton. homicide would be murder, and not manslaughter. The matter alleged as provocation must consist of some sort of battery, with or without words, and not of words only. Arch. Cr. Pr. 631-4.