Definition
Temporary; interim; adopted or authorized for the time being pending a more permanent arrangement or final determination. A provisional measure, order, or appointment is not intended to be final — it holds a situation in place until circumstances allow for a more complete resolution.
In legal usage, "provisional" modifies a wide range of nouns across procedural, administrative, and substantive law:
1. Provisional remedy: A court-ordered measure taken before final judgment to preserve the status quo or protect a party's rights in the interim. Attachment, garnishment, preliminary injunction, and the appointment of a receiver are the classic examples.
2. Provisional appointment or officer: A person placed in a role temporarily — such as a provisional assignee in bankruptcy — until a permanent selection is made by the appropriate authority.
3. Provisional government: A governing body established on a temporary basis, typically during a crisis, transition, or period of reorganization, pending the formation of a permanent government.
4. Provisional order or decision: An administrative or judicial determination that takes effect immediately but remains subject to confirmation, modification, or revocation.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Primarily attaches the term to a specific political context — a member of the Provisional Irish Republican Army — a specialized historical usage that carries no legal relevance.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "Of the nature of a provision; serving as a provision for the time being — used of partial or temporary arrangements; as, a provisional government; a provisional treaty."
The common meaning captures the core idea accurately: temporary, interim, for the time being. The gap, however, is precision. In law, "provisional" is a term of art that triggers specific procedural consequences. A provisional remedy is not merely informal or tentative — it is a formally ordered legal mechanism with defined requirements, grounds, and limits. Researchers should not treat "provisional" as a loose synonym for "informal" or "incomplete."
---
Common Confusion
Provisional vs. Interlocutory: Both describe interim legal action, but they are not synonymous. "Interlocutory" typically describes orders or appeals that arise during the course of litigation but before final judgment, and the term is most often applied to judicial rulings. "Provisional" more commonly describes remedies, appointments, or governmental structures that are explicitly temporary by design. An interlocutory injunction is a ruling made mid-litigation; a provisional remedy is a procedural tool sought at the outset to preserve a party's position.
Provisional vs. Preliminary: These terms overlap but are not identical. "Preliminary" often signals a threshold stage — as in a preliminary hearing or preliminary injunction — and may imply a step toward something further. "Provisional" more specifically signals conditionality and replaceability: the arrangement is explicitly subject to supersession by something permanent.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The most critical research application is in the law of provisional remedies, where "provisional" is a technical category encompassing attachment, garnishment, receivership, and lis pendens — all mechanisms that operate before a final judgment is entered. Researchers encountering the term in older procedural materials should note that the category of provisional remedies was more formally systematized in earlier codes and practice treatises than it sometimes appears in modern procedure, where the term has been partially absorbed into broader discussions of preliminary injunctions and pre-judgment relief.
In historical bankruptcy materials — particularly English practice before modern insolvency reform — "provisional assignee" refers to a specific officer with defined powers distinct from the permanent assignee later chosen by creditors. Treating these roles as interchangeable distorts the procedural record.
In constitutional and administrative law contexts, "provisional government" appears in historical sources relating to territorial governance, Reconstruction-era administration, and transitional regimes. The legal status of acts taken by provisional governments — whether binding on successor governments, whether cognizable in courts — was a live question in 19th-century jurisprudence and is not reliably addressed in modern sources.
Jurisdictional variation in provisional remedy procedure is significant: the grounds required, the bond or security demanded, and the scope of available provisional relief differ substantially across jurisdictions. Historical sources predating the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (1938) will reflect a patchwork of code-pleading systems in which provisional remedies had more rigid, enumerated procedural requirements.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The historical dictionaries are consistent but thin. All three treat "provisional" as a pure adjective meaning temporary or interim. Rapalje & Lawrence offers only the single word "Temporary." Anderson's Dictionary adds useful examples — provisional assignee, committee, court, injunction, or other remedy — that signal the term's range of application without analyzing any of them. Black's (2nd Ed.) is the most informative, providing brief sub-entries for provisional assignees and provisional government, and gesturing at the English bankruptcy practice context.
What the historical dictionaries collectively miss is the doctrinal weight the term carries when attached to remedies. None of them treat "provisional remedy" as a coherent category requiring analysis. Researchers relying solely on these sources will understand what "provisional" means in isolation but will need to turn to procedural treatises — Pomeroy, Wait on Actions and Defenses, or the relevant code commentaries — to understand how provisional remedies actually operated, what distinguished them from each other, and what procedural conditions governed their availability.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The availability, scope, and procedural requirements for provisional remedies vary considerably by jurisdiction. Some states enumerate provisional remedies by statute with specific grounds for each; others treat them more flexibly under general equity powers. Federal courts apply their own standards under the Federal Rules, which in some respects diverge from state practice even when state law governs the underlying claim.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Provisional Remedies — Attachment, Garnishment, Receivership, and Lis Pendens (The Law Mind Remedies & Equity Encyclopedia)
---