PROCEDENDO ON AID PRAYER

3 definitions found across Law Mind sources

PROCEDENDO ON AID PRAYERAuthored
The Law Mind • 743 words
Definition
A writ of procedendo on aid prayer is a command issuing from Chancery to a common law court directing it to resume proceedings in a real action after a defendant has prayed in aid of the Crown and that aid has been granted. When a tenant in a real action sought assistance from the Crown as a co-defendant — because the Crown had an interest in the land — the common law court was required to suspend its proceedings while the Crown was joined. Once Chancery resolved the Crown's participation and determined how the matter should proceed, a writ of procedendo issued to the lower court ordering it to continue with the litigation. The writ thus functioned as a resumption command rather than a removal or review mechanism.
Common Confusion
PROCEDENDO ON AID PRAYER should not be confused with the general writ of procedendo, which orders a lower court to proceed to judgment in a case it has improperly delayed or declined to decide. The general procedendo is a supervisory writ directed at a court's inaction or obstruction. Procedendo on aid prayer is a specialized variant tied exclusively to the aid prayer procedure — it responds not to a court's wrongful delay but to a court's legally required suspension, signaling that the suspension has run its course and proceedings may resume.
Why It Matters in Research
This term is nearly extinct in modern practice and will appear almost exclusively in historical sources dealing with English real property procedure and the prerogatives of the Crown. Researchers encountering the phrase in older treatises, Year Books, or early American equity materials should understand that its context is always a real action — an action involving title to land — never a personal action in its primary form, though Rapalje & Lawrence note that procedendo on aid prayer could also arise in personal actions under certain conditions. The most important navigational point is the connection between this writ and the broader aid prayer procedure. To understand procedendo on aid prayer fully, a researcher must first work through what praying in aid meant as a pleading device, the Crown's particular status as an aid-grantor, and the jurisdictional division between the Court of Common Pleas and Chancery in medieval and early modern English practice. Sources that discuss procedendo generally — particularly Fitzherbert's Natura Brevium, cited by both Black's and Rapalje & Lawrence — are essential primary references for this writ's operation. American relevance is minimal. The procedure depended on the Crown's participation as a real-action defendant, a configuration that had no practical American successor after independence. Researchers finding references to aid prayer in early American cases are most likely seeing the general aid prayer doctrine applied without the Crown element, which is a distinct procedure.
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary and Rapalje & Lawrence are in close agreement, nearly identical in language, both tracing the writ to Fitzherbert's Natura Brevium at folio 154. Both sources define the writ by its procedural occasion: aid granted in a real action, proceedings in Common Pleas suspended, writ from Chancery issuing to direct resumption. Rapalje & Lawrence adds the note that the writ could arise on a personal action as well, a detail Black's omits or absorbs into the general procedendo entry. Neither source provides extended doctrinal analysis. This is characteristic of both dictionaries when treating archaic forms — the entries preserve the formal definition and the primary source reference without elaborating on how the writ operated in practice or how frequently it was invoked. Fitzherbert's Natura Brevium remains the authoritative source behind both entries and the natural next stop for a researcher who needs more than a dictionary definition. The Georgia case reference in Rapalje & Lawrence (17 Ga. 211, 213) appears in the context of the verb "proceed" and is not authority for the writ itself; it should not be read as American case law on procedendo on aid prayer.
Jurisdictional Note
This writ belongs to English common law and equity procedure and has no operative equivalent in American jurisdictions. Its appearance in American legal dictionaries reflects the comprehensive treatment of inherited English forms rather than any active American practice. It is of purely historical and comparative interest to American researchers.
Related Terms
Procedendo (general writ); Aid Prayer; Real Action; Praying in Aid; Writ; Chancery; Court of Common Pleas (historical); Supersedeas; Resummons
PROCEDENDO ON AID PRAYERmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
If one pray in aid of the crown in real action, and aid be granted, it shall be awarded that he sue to the sovereign in chancery, and the
PROCEDENDO ON AID PRAYERmain
Rapalje & Lawrence • 1883
-If one pray in aid of the crown in real action, and aid be granted, it shall be awarded that he sue to the sovereign in Chancery, and the justices in the Common Pleas shall stay until this writ of procedendo de loquelá come to them. So also on a personal action.-F. N. B. 154. through the successful application of the proper remedies. See PRACTICE. PROCEED, (equivalent to "issue"). 17 Ga. 211, 213. PROCEED, NOT то, (in a stipulation, equivalent to "not to sue"). 57 Ga. 140. PROCEED TO SEA, (when a ship is said to). 9 Serg. & R. (Pa.) 154. - (in a statute). L. R. 4 A. & Ε. 161. PROCEEDING, (defined). Clarke (N. Y.) 9; 1 Duer (N. Y.) 617; 3 How. (N. Y.) Pr. 369; 7 Neb. 50. (in a statute). 28 Ala. 328; 1 Harr. (N. J.) 487; 2 East 213; 7 Ch. D. 371; L. R. 2 C. P. 532. PROCEEDING IN A CAUSE, (what is). 15 Wend. (N. Y.) 105. PROCEEDING IN COURT, (in the code). 3 Sandf. (N. Y.) 740. PROCEEDING IN A SUIT, (defined). 11 N. Y. Leg. Obs. 119. (what is). 1 Nev. & M. 355. PROCEEDINGS, (defined). 9 N. Y. 369. (in a statute). L. R. 3 Q. B. 170; 3 Com. Dig. 48 п. PROCEEDINGS IN A SUIT, (what are). 9 Pet. (U. S.) 368. PROCEEDINGS IN COURT, (what are not). 48 Barb. (N. Y.) 116, 119. PROCEEDINGS, OTHER, (in a statute). 1 East 304. PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE HAD, (in a statute). 31 Wis. 117. PROCEEDINGS UPON A JUDGMENT, (in a statute). 16 Pet. (U. S.) 303, 313.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In