PRIVILEGE FROM ARREST

3 definitions found across Law Mind sources

PRIVILEGE FROM ARRESTAuthored
The Law Mind • 945 words
Definition
A legal immunity that protects certain persons from civil arrest while performing specific public duties or exercising protected rights. The privilege operates as a temporary exemption from the ordinary process of civil arrest, not a permanent immunity from legal accountability. It does not extend to criminal process. Three principal categories of persons have historically held this privilege: 1. Members of the legislature. Legislators are exempt from civil arrest while attending legislative sessions and during a reasonable period of travel to and from those sessions. The privilege exists to ensure the legislature can conduct its business without executive or judicial interference through civil process directed at individual members. 2. Parties and witnesses in court proceedings. A person attending court as a party or witness enjoys a temporary exemption from civil arrest during attendance and for a reasonable transit period before and after. The privilege protects the administration of justice by ensuring witnesses can appear without fear of being seized on other civil claims. 3. Diplomats and certain other public officers. Foreign diplomatic personnel and certain classes of public officers are exempt from civil arrest as a matter of public policy and, in the case of diplomats, international obligation.
Common Confusion
PRIVILEGE FROM ARREST should not be confused with immunity from criminal prosecution or with sovereign immunity. The privilege is narrow: it shields the holder from civil arrest only, for a defined period, and in connection with a specific duty or status. A legislator with the privilege can still be indicted, tried, and convicted of a crime. A witness protected from civil arrest while attending court remains fully subject to service of civil process by other means. Researchers working in older sources must be careful not to read the privilege as a broader freedom from legal process than the sources intend. The privilege also differs from parliamentary privilege in its broader sense. Parliamentary privilege in British and American constitutional law encompasses freedom of speech and debate as well as freedom from arrest, but the two components are distinct and have different scopes, different waiver rules, and different constitutional foundations.
Why It Matters in Research
This term is predominantly a creature of historical legal practice. Civil arrest — the seizure of a defendant's person to compel appearance or satisfy a civil judgment — was a routine tool of civil procedure in England and early American practice. As civil arrest was progressively abolished by statute across American jurisdictions through the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, privilege from arrest lost most of its practical significance in domestic civil litigation. A researcher encountering this term in pre-twentieth-century American materials is reading about a live doctrine. In modern materials, the same phrase most often appears in constitutional law discussions of the Speech or Debate Clause, in diplomatic immunity analysis, or in purely historical context. The constitutional dimension is significant. Article I, Section 6 of the U.S. Constitution provides that Senators and Representatives "shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same." Most state constitutions contain parallel provisions for state legislators. Researchers should track the specific constitutional text applicable to their jurisdiction rather than relying on the common law formulation alone, because constitutional privilege from arrest has been interpreted narrowly in modern courts — largely because civil arrest itself is obsolete, making the clause's practical operation vestigial. The witness privilege — protecting attending witnesses from civil arrest — generated considerable common law doctrine around questions of when transit time began and ended, whether the privilege extended to parties as well as witnesses, and how courts handled abuse of the privilege (as when a party deliberately invoked witness status to evade service). This body of case law appears in nineteenth-century American reporters and digests under headings such as "Privilege" and "Arrest" and requires attention to the civil procedure context of the jurisdiction and period.
Historical Dictionary Support
Rapalje & Lawrence define privilege from arrest as the exemption of certain classes of persons from arrest on civil process, identifying the three core categories of legislators, parties and witnesses in suits, and ambassadors. The entry is compact and descriptive, consistent with the hornbook treatment this term received in nineteenth-century American practice. The sources treat the privilege as well-settled, without significant internal controversy about its existence — the contested questions were always at the margins: the length of the transit period, the classes of persons covered, and the scope of the "breach of the peace" exception that carves criminal conduct out of the legislative privilege. What historical dictionaries understandably omit is the trajectory: the abolition of civil arrest as an institution, which rendered most of this doctrine functionally inert. A researcher relying solely on Rapalje & Lawrence for current doctrine would significantly overstate the privilege's modern operational scope.
Jurisdictional Note
The legislative privilege from arrest is constitutionally grounded at the federal level and in most state constitutions, giving it a durability that the common law forms of the privilege lack. Diplomatic immunity from arrest is now primarily governed by federal statute and international treaty rather than common law. The witness and party privilege, where it survives at all, is a matter of state procedural law, and its status varies considerably across jurisdictions.
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
See Law Mind Encyclopedia: Legislative Immunity; Diplomatic Immunity; Civil Arrest.
Related Terms
Parliamentary Privilege — Speech or Debate Clause — Diplomatic Immunity — Sovereign Immunity — Civil Arrest — Contempt — Immunity — Witness Privilege — Legislator Immunity — Service of Process
PRIVILEGE FROM ARRESTmain
Bouvier's Law Dictionary • 1928
Privilege from arrest on civil process. It is either permanent, as in case of am- bassadors, public ministers, and their ser- vants, the royal family and servants, peers and peeresses, etc., or temporary, as in case of members of both houses of con- gress, and of the state legislature, who are privileged eundo, manendo, et redeundo; 1 Kent 243; Cooley, Const. Lim. 168; 8 R. I. 43; see 2 Stra. 985; practising barris- ters, while actually engaged in the busi- ness of the court; 2 Dowl. 51; 1 H. Bla. 636; 1 M. & W. 488; 6 Ad. & E. 623; a clergyman in England whilst going to church, performing services, and return- ing; 7 Bingh. 320; witnesses and parties to a suit and bail, eundo, manendo, et re- deundo; 5 B. & Ad. 1078; 6 Dowl. 632; 1 Maule & S. 638; 1 M. & W. 488; 6 Ad. & E. 623; 17 R. I. 715; 136 N. Y. 585; and other persons who are privileged by law. See ARREST. Privilege (from arrest) does not extend to defendants in criminal cases; 6 Dist. Rep. Pa. 595. In case of the arrest of a legislator con- trary to law, the house of which he is a member may give summary relief, by ordering his discharge, and if this be not complied with, by punishing the persons concerned in such arrest, as for contempt of its authority. If the houses neglect to interfere, the court from which the procевв issued should set it aside, on the fact being shown to it; and any court or officer hav- ing authority to issue writs of habeas cor- pus may inquire into the case and release the party; Cooley, Const. Lim. 163; Cush. Parl. Pract. § 546. "When attachment is mere process, privilege exists; when it is punitive or disciplinary, privilege does not exist." Brett, Comm. 748. See 1 H. L. Cas. By the constitutions of some of the states, the privilege has been enlarged, so as to exempt the persons of legislators from any service of civil process; e.g. Michigan, Kansas. Nebraska, California, Wisconsin, Indiana, Oregon, and others. See EXTERRITORIALITY; Piggott, Consu- lar Jurisdiction.
PRIVILEGE FROM ARRESTmain
Burrill's Law Dictionary • 1870
In practice. A privilege from arrest on civil process, enjoyed either permanently, as by ambassadors, public ministers, and their servants, married women, &c.; or temporarily, as by members of Congress and of State legislatures, during their attendance at the session of their respective houses, and in going to and returning from the same; attorneys, solicitors and counsellors, during their actual and necessary attendance on their respective courts; parties to a suit and witnesses, while going to, attending and returning from court, and other persons

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In