PRIST

Definition

A Law French term meaning "ready." In the era of oral pleading, prist was the formal word by which a party tendered or joined issue. When a pleader stated a position and concluded with prist, the word signaled that the party was prepared to stand on the issue raised and submit it for determination. The term appeared in set formulaic phrases, such as ne unques seisi, prist ("never seised, ready") or nostre baron morust seisi, prist ("our husband died seised, ready"), which were verbal conventions completing the issue on the record.

Common Language

Modern common usage (Wiktionary): No entry. The term has no current common English meaning. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): No entry. "Prist" did not exist as an English word outside legal usage. Editorial note: This is pure Law French legal jargon with no common English counterpart. The COMMON LANGUAGE section does not apply.

Why It Matters in Research

Prist appears almost exclusively in Year Book materials and early common law pleading records from the thirteenth through sixteenth centuries. Researchers encountering it in primary sources should understand it as a marker of issue-joinder, not as a substantive legal concept in its own right. Its presence in a Year Book entry or plea roll typically signals that the pleading stage is closing and the parties have locked in the issue to be tried. The term is practically invisible in post-oral-pleading sources. Once written pleading became standard and the formulaic oral exchanges of the common law courts fell away, prist disappeared from practice. Researchers working in pre-modern English records — particularly Year Books from the reign of Edward III and earlier — will encounter it regularly. Those working in any later period almost certainly will not. The formulaic phrases preserved in Burrill are the most useful navigational tool. Seeing prist at the end of a plea-roll formula is a reliable indicator that the excerpt comes from oral pleading practice. If a researcher finds the term in a later source, it is almost certainly a quotation from or commentary on earlier practice, not live usage.

Historical Dictionary Support

Burrill's Law Dictionary provides the most substantive treatment, preserving several Year Book examples with parallel English translations that make the term's function clear in context. The examples drawn from Hilary and Paschal terms of 6 Edward III show prist operating in both common and several right disputes, as well as in seisen-based issue formulae. Black's Law Dictionary offers a brief but accurate definition, confirming the meaning as "ready" and the function as expressing a tender or joinder of issue. Its entry is minimal, which accurately reflects the term's narrow scope. Rapalje & Lawrence's entry supplied in the source material does not address prist at all; the text provided concerns towage in admiralty law and appears to be a misfiled or erroneous source fragment. No synthesis from Rapalje & Lawrence can be drawn for this term. All three historical dictionaries that do address the term agree on the core meaning. There is no meaningful divergence. The term's historical trajectory is one of obsolescence rather than evolution — it did not change meaning, it simply ceased to be used as the procedural context that generated it disappeared.

Jurisdictional Note

Prist is a term of English common law pleading with no parallel development in civil law or equity jurisdictions. It has no meaningful American doctrinal history, having become obsolete before the colonial period generated substantial procedural literature.

Related Terms