Definition
In pleading and equity practice, a prayer is the portion of a complaint, petition, or bill in equity in which the pleader formally requests the specific relief sought from the court. It appears at the conclusion of the pleading and performs two related functions: it identifies what the party is asking the court to do, and it defines the outer boundaries of the relief the court may grant.
Two distinct uses of the term are standard:
1. PRAYER FOR RELIEF (or simply "prayer"): The substantive request that the court award a specific remedy — damages, an injunction, specific performance, a declaratory judgment, or some other form of relief. A prayer may be specific (requesting a named remedy in a named amount) or general (requesting "such other and further relief as the court deems just and proper"). General prayers operate as a catch-all and allow courts to fashion relief not explicitly itemized.
2. PRAYER FOR PROCESS: Historically, in equity practice, the portion of the bill requesting that a writ of subpoena issue to compel the defendant to appear and answer. This usage is largely obsolete under modern procedural rules, which replaced the equity bill's formal prayer for process with standardized summons procedures.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): A practice of communicating with one's God or a spiritual entity; an act of supplication; also, colloquially, "the remotest hope or chance."
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): One who prays; a supplicant.
The gap here is significant. In ordinary English, prayer is almost exclusively religious or devotional in meaning. In law, prayer is a technical term of pleading with no religious content — it is simply a formal demand for judicial action. Researchers encountering the word in equity-era documents should not read spiritual connotation into it. The term's survival into modern practice (as "prayer for relief") means the legal usage remains live, even as the equity procedural framework that produced it has been largely dismantled.
---
Common Confusion
PRAYER vs. DEMAND FOR JUDGMENT: In modern federal and most state practice, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(c) and its state analogs use "demand for judgment" or "demand for relief" where equity practice used "prayer." The terms are functionally equivalent but the vocabulary shift matters in historical research: a pre-merger pleading will contain a prayer; a post-merger pleading will contain a demand. Researchers working across the procedural merger divide (roughly pre- and post-1938 federally) should expect the vocabulary to change while the underlying concept remains stable.
PRAYER FOR PROCESS vs. PRAYER FOR RELIEF: These are distinct parts of the historical equity bill. The prayer for process requested court machinery (compulsory process against the defendant); the prayer for relief requested the substantive remedy. Modern practice collapses both into a unified pleading structure, eliminating the prayer for process as a formal component.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The term prayer is a reliable marker of equity pleading practice, and its presence or absence in a document tells a researcher something about the procedural forum and era. Pre-merger equity bills in the Law Mind corpus will use "prayer" as a term of art with formal significance; post-merger complaints may retain the word colloquially but the structural weight it carried has shifted.
Several navigational traps:
First, jurisdiction matters for timing. Federal courts merged law and equity in 1938 under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. State courts merged at different times — some much later, a few retaining equity terminology well into the late twentieth century. A state court document using "prayer" in 1960 may still be operating in a formal equity framework.
Second, the prayer historically constrained relief. Courts of equity were generally reluctant to grant relief beyond what the prayer requested, particularly specific relief. The presence of a general prayer (catch-all language) in a bill was therefore strategically important. Historical treatises and opinions discussing whether a court could grant relief "not prayed for" are engaging this constraint directly.
Third, the constitutional dimension of "school prayer" — a completely unrelated usage — creates noise in corpus searches. Any keyword search for "prayer" in constitutional law sources will surface Establishment Clause material on government-sponsored religious observance in schools. This is an entirely distinct legal domain from pleading practice. Researchers must filter aggressively.
Fourth, Anderson's cross-reference to PRECATORY is useful: precatory language (expressions of wish or desire, as opposed to command) shares etymological and conceptual proximity to prayer in the sense of request. Trust and will instruments sometimes use language characterized as precatory rather than mandatory, and the distinction carries legal consequence. The connection is worth following in corpus research involving donative instruments.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The historical dictionaries are in close agreement on the core definition: prayer is the request in an equity bill, and by extension the portion of the bill containing that request. Black's (both editions), Bouvier's, and Anderson's converge without meaningful divergence on this point. The definition is stable across sources.
Bouvier's is the most precise in flagging the word's dual usage — strictly, the request itself; commonly, the section of the bill containing it — a distinction that matters when parsing older chancery documents where "the prayer" may refer to text or to the act of requesting.
Anderson's adds the most navigational value by noting the varieties of prayer (for process, for special relief, for general relief, or combined) and by directing researchers to compare ORATOR and PETITION, which reinforces that "prayer" sits within a cluster of equity-specific pleading vocabulary that does not map cleanly onto common-law or modern procedural equivalents.
Rapalje & Lawrence, as reproduced in the source material, does not contain a substantive entry for prayer — the excerpt provided concerns prescription and praetextus. Researchers should not rely on Rapalje & Lawrence for this term.
None of the historical dictionaries address the constitutional "school prayer" doctrine, which is entirely a twentieth-century development and postdates the core dictionary editions.
---
Jurisdictional Note
In federal courts, prayer for relief is governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(3), which requires a demand for the relief sought. State practice varies: some states retain "prayer" as the operative term in their procedural rules; others have adopted demand-for-judgment language. In equity-retaining or equity-adjacent proceedings (probate, domestic relations, certain injunctive contexts), prayer language persists longer than in ordinary civil litigation.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The Establishment Clause in Public Schools — School Prayer, Creationism, and Curriculum (Law Mind Constitutional Law Encyclopedia) [constitutional_185]: Relevant only to the constitutional law meaning of "school prayer" — government-sponsored religious observance in public schools. This is substantively unrelated to prayer as a pleading term. Researchers in equity, civil procedure, or remedies should treat this cross-reference as inapplicable to their inquiry.
---