(977) tinguished from possessio naturalis, otherwise called nuda detentio, which was a possessing tatûs either to defend the county against the king's enemies, or to keep the peace, or to pursue felons. Persons failing to obey the summons are liable to fine and imprisonment. 2 Steph. Com. 628; 4 Id. possession.-Brown. 254; Stat. 13 Hen. IV. c. 7. POSSESSED, (defined). 1 Wash. (Va.) 52. (equivalent to " "ownership" in 22 Conn. 462, 472. (in tax act). 3 Mass. 428, 429. a will). (978) being under the control of any one, it is Holl. Jur. 129.) This is called the "right not possessed; hence, if a piece of land is deserted and left without fences or other signs of occupation, it is not in the possession of any one, and the possession is said to be vacant. The question whether possession of land is vacant is of importance in actions for recovering possession, as in such cases service of the writ is effected by posting a copy of it on part of the land. Rules of Court, ix. 8. See SERVICE. of possession."* Ordinarily, possession (unless combined with other elements) does not affect the question of ownership; and, therefore, if A., being wrongfully in possession of a thing, conveys it to B., В. cannot retain it against the true owner, even though he may have believed A. to be the true owner and paid him the value of the thing. But in a few cases possession is sufficient to enable a person without title to give a perfect title to a bonâ fide acquirer. Thus, if A. steals money or a negotiable instrument from B. and transfers it for value to C., who has no notice of the theft, B. cannot claim it from C. (Miller v. Race, 1 Burr. 452; 1 Sm. Lead. Cas. 538. See EARMARK; MARKET OVERT; NEGOTIABLE.) So, under the English Factors Acts (q. v.), a person in possession of goods belonging to another may, in certain cases, sell or pledge them, so as to give a good title to the purchaser or pledgee. As to long-continued adverse possession, see infra, & 10. 2. "Possession" as opposed to "enjoyment," "reversion," &c. -Possession does not necessarily imply use or enjoyment; thus, a warehouseman has possession of the goods entrusted to him, without having the use of them. But inasmuch as the use of property cannot be had without possession, the term "possession" is frequently used as implying use and enjoyment, and in this sense is opposed to "reversion," "remainder," "expectancy," "action," &c.; thus, a tenant for life in possession is one who has the immediate benefit of the property, (e. g. by occupation, receipt of the rents or income, 24. Criminal law. In criminal law, &c.,) as opposed to a tenant in remainder, whose right to the enjoyment of the property is deferred (see ESTATE, 9 et seq.); a chose in possession is a chattel which can be immediately used, such as a book, while a chose in action is merely the right to obtain possession of a chattel, as in the case of a debt. 2 Bl. Com. 396. See CHOSE; (979) tioneer. (Williams v. Millington, 1 H. Bl. 29. Adverse ab initio, or by matter 81, cited in Woolfe v. Horne, 2 Q. B. D. subsequent.-Adverse possession is of 358.) So the right may be absolute, i. e. two kinds, according as it was adverse good against all persons; or relative, i. e. good against all with certain exceptions. Thus, a carrier or borrower of goods has a right to their possession against all the world except the owner. from the beginning, or has become so by matter subsequent. Thus, if a mere trespasser takes possession of A.'s property, and retains it against him, his possession is adverse ab initio. But if A. grants a lease 6. Derivative possession. In jurisof land to B., or B. obtains possession of prudence, the possession of a lessee, bailee, the land as A.'s bailiff, or guardian, or licensee, &c., is called "derivative posses-trustee, his possession can only become sion," while in law the possessory interest adverse by some change in his position. of such a person, considered with referIn the case of a lessee, his possession ence to his rights against third persons becomes adverse (1) if he discontinues who interfere with his possession, is usupayment of rent. (Stat. 3 and 4 Will. IV. ally called a "special" or "qualified propс. 27, 23.) This section abolished the conerty," meaning a limited right of ownertrary rule which formerly prevailed, and it ship. Holl. Jur. 127 et seq. See PROPERTY. is hence sometimes said that the statute 7. Wrongful possession.-Possesabolished the old rule of non-adverse sion without right is called "wrongful" or "adverse," according as the rights of the owner or those of the possessor are considered. Wrongful or naked possession is where a person takes possession of property to which he is not entitled, so that the possession and the right of possession are in one person, and the right to possession in another. Where an owner is wrongfully dispossessed he has a right of action to recover it, or, if he has an opportunity, he can exercise the remedy of recaption in the case of goods, or of entry in the case of land. (See ENTRY, 23; RECAPTION.) Formerly, the doctrine of wrongful posses sion was of more importance than now, owing to the peculiar rules applicable to disseisin, intrusion, feoffments, &c. See the subject discussed in Taylor v. Horde, 1 Burr. 60; 2 Sm. Lead. Cas. 681. 8. Adverse possession.-Adverse possession is a possession inconsistent with the right of the true owner; in other words, where a person possesses property in a manner in which he is not entitled to possess it, and without anything to show that he possesses it otherwise than as owner, i. e. with the intention of excluding all persons from it, including the rightful owner, he is in adverse possession of it. Thus, if A. is in possession of a field of B.'s, he is in adverse possession of it, unless there is something to show that his possession is consistent with a recognition of B.'s title. Ward v. Carttar, L. R. 1 Eq. 29. possession. Or (2) if he pays rent to a person claiming the land adversely to the rightful owner, and does not afterwards pay any rent to the rightful owner; in the latter case the rule only applies, in England, if the rent amounts to 20s. or upwards. (Id. 29.) In the case of persons other than lessees, the rule seems to be that possession is never considered adverse if it can be referred to a lawful title, and that where a person obtains possession by a permissive or fiduciary title, or by his own agreement, or by judgment of law (e. g. under an elegit), he and all claiming under him are presumed to hold possession according to that right. Thomas 2. Thomas, 2 K. & J. 83; Pelly v. Bascomb, 4 Giff. 394; Saunders v. Annealey, 2 Sch. & L. 73; Nepean v. Doe, 2 Sm. Lead. Cas. 584, and the cases referred to in Shelf. R. P. Stat. 148. 10. Effects of adverse possession. -Adverse possession not only entitles the adverse possessor, like every other possessor, to be protected in his possession against all who cannot show a better title, (supra, & 3,) but also, if the adverse possessor remains in possession for a certain period of time, produces the effect either of barring the right of the true owner, (the Land Transfer Act, 1875, provides (221) that as against a registered proprietor under the act there is said to be no acquisition of title by adverse possession,) and thus converting the possessor into the owner, or of depriving the true owner of (980) his right of action to recover his property,* (see LIMITATION, 26; PRESCRIPTION;) and this although the true owner is ignorant of the adverse possessor being in occupation. Rains v. Buxton, 14 Ch. D. 537. With reference to the mode of its exercise, possession is of several kinds. ? 11. Actual, or in fact.-A person has actual possession (de facto possession, possession in fact,) of a thing when he exercises physical control over it. Thus, a person who holds a thing in his hand has actual possession of it, and the lessee of a house is in actual possession of it while he occupies it. For instances of actual possession, see Lows v. Telford, 1 App. Cas. 414; Coverdale v. Charlton, 4 Q. B. D. 118. As to what is "actual possession" within the meaning of the Reform Act, see Wms. Sett. 14; Hadfield's Case, L. R. 8 C. P. 306. 12. Constructive, or in law. -A person has constructive possession (or possession in law) (1) when some one representing him has actual possession of the thing. Thus, if A., the owner of the land, leases it to B., A. has constructive possession by B., and if A. dies intestate, leaving C. his heir, C. is immediately in constructive possession of the land by B., although he has never had actual possession; (2) a person may have constructive possession of one thing because he has actual possession of another; thus, if a person is in legal possession of a house, thing at the same time. In re Fells, 4 Ch. D. 509. 214. Apparent and formal possession. Under the Bills of Sale Act, (Stat. 41 and 42 Vict. c. 31; Robs. Bankr. 459,) the validity of an unregistered bill of sale frequently depends upon whether the owner of the goods remains in "apparent possession" of them, having merely given "formal possession" to the creditor. Thus, where the holder of an unregistered bill of sale of furniture put a man into the house, but did not interfere with the furniture in such a manner as to show that it had been taken out of the debtor's control, it was held that the possession so taken was merely formal, and that the goods remained in the apparent possession of the debtor. (Ex parte Lewis, L. R. 6 Ch. 626. See 22 4 and 8 of the act.) As to possession excluding the doctrine of reputed ownership, see Ex parte National Ass. Co., 10 Ch. D. 408. See BILL OF SALE, 2 4, n. As to possession in the law of bankruptcy, see ORDER AND DISPOSITION; RE- (981) man be disseised of an acre of land, the disseisee hath jus proprietatis, the disseisor hath jus possessionis (but see 2 Bl. Com. 195); and if the disseisee release to the disseisor, hee hath jus proprietatis et possessionis." Co. Litt. 266 a. See SEISIN; DROIT; TENANCY IN COMMON, (what words create in a will). 15 Wend. (N. Y.) 615; 5 Binn. (Pa.) 16, 18; 2 Watts (Pa.) 185; 8 Com. Dig. 447. TENANCY, JOINT. - See JOINT TEN-