POSSESSION

8 definitions found across Law Mind sources

POSSESSIONAuthored
The Law Mind • 1808 words • Verified
Definition
Possession is the condition in which a person exercises, or has the capacity to exercise, physical control or dominion over a thing, coupled with the intention to do so. It is one of the foundational concepts in property, criminal, and tort law, and its meaning shifts meaningfully across those contexts. Three distinct senses operate in legal usage: 1. Possession as a factual state. The physical detention or control of a thing — what the historical sources call "actual" or "corporeal" possession. A person who holds an object in their hands possesses it in this sense. The control need not be continuous, but the possessor must have the present ability to exercise dominion and the intent to do so. 2. Possession as a legal relationship. The law recognizes possession even where physical control is absent or held by another. A person may possess property through an agent, bailee, or tenant who holds it in the possessor's name. This is "constructive" possession — a legal conclusion that the law draws from the surrounding relationship rather than from physical fact. 3. Possession as a basis for rights and criminal liability. Possession is treated independently as a source of legal consequence: it is prima facie evidence of title to personal property, grounds for certain causes of action, and the actus reus of numerous criminal offenses (drug possession, unlawful possession of weapons, and others). In the criminal context, possession is defined by statute and interpreted through case law in ways that diverge substantially from the common understanding. ---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): "To invest with property." [Note: the Wiktionary entry provided is for the verb "possess," not the noun "possession." Ordinary usage treats possession as the simple act or state of having or holding something.] Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "The act or state of possessing, or holding as one's own. The having, holding, or detention of property in one's power or command; actual seizin or occupancy; ownership, whether rightful or wrongful." The gap is significant in two directions. First, ordinary usage conflates possession with ownership; law treats them as separate — a thief possesses stolen goods but does not own them, and a tenant possesses leased property the landlord owns. Second, criminal law extends possession to cover situations where a person never physically touched an object at all (constructive possession, discussed below), a result that common speakers would not recognize as "possessing" anything. ---
Common Confusion
Possession vs. Ownership. These are not synonyms. Ownership denotes title — the right to the thing. Possession denotes control — the fact (or legal conclusion) of holding. They frequently coincide but are legally distinct: possession without title is possible (a finder, a bailee, a thief), and title without possession is equally possible (a landlord, a bailor, a remainderman). Much of property and personal property law exists precisely to sort out competing claims where the two come apart. Actual Possession vs. Constructive Possession. This distinction is critical in criminal law. Actual possession means the object is physically on or immediately controlled by the person. Constructive possession means the person has knowledge of the object and the power and intent to exercise control over it, even without physical proximity. A person can be convicted of possessing contraband found in a location they control (a home, a vehicle, a storage unit) without ever having touched it. Courts and statutes define these terms, and the definitions vary by jurisdiction and offense. ---
Core Elements
The classical formulation from Rapalje & Lawrence identifies three requisites of possession that have remained durable across legal systems: 1. Actual control (corpus). There must be some physical relationship between the person and the thing — the ability, at minimum, to exercise dominion. This does not require constant physical contact, but the possessor must be able to exclude others. 2. Intent (animus). The person must intend to hold the thing as possessor — either against all the world (as an owner would) or against all persons except those with superior right. Purely inadvertent custody (finding an object, receiving it unknowingly) may not constitute possession in the legal sense without the accompanying intent. 3. Exclusion of others. Bouvier captures this: "not only one's own dealing with the thing is physically possible, but every other person's dealing with it is capable of being excluded." Possession is relational — it carries a claim against interference. In criminal law, a fourth element is commonly required by statute and case law: knowledge. A person cannot possess contraband they did not know existed. Knowledge is implied in the intent element under the classical formulation but is frequently treated as an explicit, separately charged element in modern criminal statutes. ---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES Actual Possession. Direct physical control. The thing is on the person or in their immediate physical custody. Constructive Possession. Legal possession attributed without physical control, based on knowledge of the object and the power and intent to control it. Central to criminal law analysis. Joint Possession. Two or more persons share constructive or actual possession of the same thing simultaneously. Common in drug cases involving shared spaces. Exclusive Possession. Possession held by one person to the exclusion of all others. Relevant in adverse possession, landlord-tenant, and property boundary disputes. Possession Civilis (Civil Possession). The Roman-derived concept, carried into common law through Blackstone and the historical dictionaries, denoting possession held with the intent of an owner — the kind that could ripen into title or support possessory actions. Possessio Naturalis / Nuda Detentio. Bare physical detention without the legal intent element — the detention of a servant or employee who holds goods for another without any claim of right. Rapalje & Lawrence distinguishes this from true civil possession. It is a concept primarily encountered in historical sources; modern law typically handles the same ground through the law of bailment and agency. Possessio Fratris. A doctrine in English inheritance law (see Anderson's) under which possession by one sibling was treated as the other's possession for purposes of descent. Encountered in historical title research; abolished in England by the Inheritance Act 1833 and not operative in American law. ---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers encounter "possession" in at least three different registers, and the term does not travel cleanly across them. In property research, possession is a prerequisite for adverse possession claims, a basis for possessory liens, and a factor in determining priority among competing claimants. Historical sources — particularly Blackstone, Littleton, and Coke, as digested by Bouvier and Burrill — use "possession" in its civil-law sense (possessio civilis), which has specific technical content that plain-English reading will miss. The possessio fratris doctrine, though obsolete, appears in older title chains and English inheritance disputes; researchers in colonial-era American property records and early English common law sources will encounter it. In criminal law research, the definition of possession is almost entirely statute- and case-law-driven, and the historical dictionaries are largely unhelpful. The pivotal question in modern drug and weapons cases is whether constructive possession existed, and that analysis depends on jurisdiction-specific jury instructions, appellate standards, and constitutional doctrine around knowledge and mens rea. The corpus coverage in the Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia (Drug Possession — Simple Possession; Drug Possession with Intent to Distribute; Weapons Offenses — Unlawful Possession) is the primary resource for this line of research. Historical dictionary entries will not address this material. In tort and contract research, possession is relevant to conversion, trespass to chattels, and bailment. The distinction between possession and ownership matters acutely: a bailee in possession can sue a third-party wrongdoer in conversion, even though the bailor holds title. Trap for historical researchers: The older sources, including both editions of Black's and Bouvier, use "corporeal" and "incorporeal" possession in ways that track Roman law categories and do not map neatly onto modern Anglo-American usage. "Ideal custody" in the Black's definition refers to constructive possession as understood in that era, not a distinct modern concept. ---
Historical Dictionary Support
The historical dictionaries show substantial agreement on the core definition and useful divergence at the margins. Black's (both editions) provides the most structured baseline: possession is "the detention and control, or the manual or ideal custody" of a thing capable of being property, held for one's own use and enjoyment, personally or through another. The phrase "manual or ideal custody" is the 19th-century formulation of the actual/constructive distinction. Both editions are consistent and neither adds significant content beyond the other. Bouvier is the most expansive and practically useful of the historical sources. The formulation — that possession requires not only that one's own dealing with the thing be physically possible, but that others' dealing be "capable of being excluded" — is the clearest statement of the exclusion element in any of the shelf sources. Bouvier also provides the prima facie title rule (possession of personal property is prima facie title thereto), which remains operationally important in disputes over personal property. Rapalje & Lawrence supplies the three-element classical structure (actual control, intent, exclusion) in the most analytical form available in the historical corpus. It also flags the possessio civilis / nuda detentio distinction most explicitly, which is valuable for researchers working in Roman law-influenced civil law jurisdictions or early American sources that drew on civilian learning. Anderson's is narrowest in its treatment here, limiting its main entry to possessio fratris — useful for English inheritance research, irrelevant to most modern questions. What the historical sources collectively miss: the modern criminal law construction of possession, including constructive possession doctrine, the knowledge requirement in statutory offenses, and the constitutional dimensions of possession-based prosecutions. These developments are post-1900 and largely post-1950. Researchers using the historical dictionaries alone will have an accurate but incomplete picture. ---
Jurisdictional Note
Constructive possession doctrine varies significantly by jurisdiction, particularly in criminal cases. Federal courts and most state courts require proof of knowledge and the power and intent to exercise control, but the quantum of evidence required to sustain a conviction differs, and circuit splits exist on specific applications (e.g., possession in jointly occupied spaces). Adverse possession doctrine, while sharing the same root concept, is governed entirely by state statute and varies substantially in required duration, continuity, and hostility elements. ---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Drug Possession — Simple Possession (The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia) Drug Possession with Intent to Distribute (The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia) Weapons Offenses — Unlawful Possession (The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia) ---
Related Terms
Actual Possession Constructive Possession Adverse Possession Ownership Title Bailment Custody (property sense) Conversion Trespass to Chattels Possessory Lien Possessio Fratris Animus Possidendi Corpus (possession element) Control Dominion Seizin
POSSESSIONmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
The detention and con- trol, or the manual or ideal custody, of any thing which may be the subject of property, for one's use and enjoyment, either as owner or as the proprietor of a qualified right in it, P and either held personally or by another who exercises it in one's place and name. That condition of facts under which one can exer- cise his power over a corporeal thing at his pleasure to the exclusion of all other per- sons. There are two kinds of possession of real property known to the law,-actual and con- structive. It is actual when in the immedi- ate occupancy of the party. It is actual where the party goes upon the land to take possession and exercises acts of ownership over it. It is actual also where one having the title is in possession of lands by his ten- ant, agent, or steward. Constructive posses- sion is where one claims to hold by virtue of some title, without having the actual occu- pancy, as when the owner of a tract of land, regularly laid out, is in possession of a part, he is constructively in possession of the whole. 30 Iowa, 241. It is either actual, where a person enters into lands or tenements descended or conveyed to him; apparent, which is a species of presumptive title where land descended to the heir of an abator, in- truder, or disseisor, who died seised; in law, when lands, etc., have descended to a man, and he has not actually entered into them; or naked, that is, mere possession, without color of right. Whar- ton. In the law of Louisiana, (as in the civil law,) possession is divided into two kinds,— natural and civil. Natural possession is that by which a man detains a thing corporeal; as, by occupying a house, cultivating ground, or retaining a movable in his possession. Nat- ural possession is also defined to be the cor- poreal detention of a thing which we possess as belonging to us, without any title to that possession, or with a title which is void. Civil possession exists when a person ceases to reside in a house or on the land which he occupied, or to detain the movable which he possessed, but without intending to abandon the possession. It is the detention of a thing by virtue of a just title and under the convic- tion of possessing as owner. Civil Code La. art. 3391, et seq. Adverse possession is a possession incon- sistent with the right of the true owner. In other words, where a person possesses prop-
POSSESSIONmain
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910
The detention and control, or the manual or ideal custody, of anything which may be the subject of property, for one’s use and enjoyment, either as owner or as the proprietor of a qualified right in it, and either held personally or by another who exercises it in one’s place and name. That condition of facts under which one can exercise his power over a corporeal thing at his pleasure to the exclusion of all other persons. See Staton v. Mullis, 92 N. C. 6382; Sunol v. Hepburn, 1 Cal. 263; Cox v. Devinney, 65 N. J. Law, 389, 47 Atl. 570; Churchill v. Onderdonk, 59 N. Y. 186; Rice v. Frayser (C. C.) 24 Fed. 460; Travers v. McElvain, 181 Ill. 382, 55 N. BE. 185; Emmerson v. State, 33 Tex. Cr. R. 89, 25 S. W. 289; Slater v. Rawson, 6 Metc. (Mass.) 444. —Actual possession. This term, as used in the provisions of Rev. St. N. Y. p. 312, § 1, authorizing proceedings to compel the determination of claims to real property, means a possession in fact effected by actual entry upon the premises; an actual occupation. Churchill v. ‘Onderdonk, 59 N. Y. 134. It means an actual occupation or possession in fact, as contradistinguished from that constructive one which the legal title draws after it. The word “actual” is used in the statute in opposition to virtual or constructive, and calls for an open, visible occupancy. Cleveland y. Crawford, 7 Hun (N. Y.) 616.—Adverse possession. The actual, open, and notorious possession and enjoyment of real property, or of any estate lying in grant continued for a certain length of time, held adversely and in denial and opposition to the title of another claimant, or under circumstan- ‘ces which indicate an assertion or color of right or title on the part of the person maintaining it, as against another person who is out of possession. Costello v. Edson, 44 Minn. 135, 46 N. W. 299; Taylor v. Philippi, 35 W. Va. 554, 14 S. E. 130; Pickett v. Pope, 74 Ala. 122; Martin v. Maine Cent. R. Co., 83 Me. 100, 21 Atl. 740; Dixon v. Cook, 47 Miss. 220.—Chose in ‘possession. A thing (subject of personal property) in actual possession, as distinguished from a “chose in action,” which is not presently in ‘the owner’s possession, but which he has a right to demand, receive, or recover by suit.—Oivil possession. In modern civil] law and in the aw of Louisiana, that possession which exists when a person ceases to reside in a house or on the land which he occupied, or to detain the mevable which he possessed, but without intending to abandon the possession. It is the detention of a thing by virtue of a just title and under the conviction of possessing as owner. Civ. Code La. art. 3391 et seq.—Constructive possession. Possession not actual but assumed to exist, where one claims to hold by virtue of some title, without having the actual occupancy, as, where the owner of a tract of land, regularly laid out, is in possession of a part, he {fs constructively in possession of the whole. Fleming v. Maddox, 30 lowa, 241.—Derivative possession. The kind of possession of one who is in the lawful occupation or custody of the property, but not under a claim of title of his own, but under a right derived from another, as, for example, a tenant, bailee, licensee, etc.—Dispossession. The act of ousting or removing one from the possession of property previously held by him, which may be tortious and unlawful, as in the case of a forcible amotion or in pursuance of law, as where a landlord “dispossesses” his tenant at the expiration of the term or for other cause by the aid of judicial process.-Estate in possession. An estate whereby a present interest passes to and resides in the tenant, not depending on any subsequent circumstance or contingency; an estate where the tenant is in actual pernancy or receipt of the rents and profits—Naked possession. The actual occupation of real estate, but without any apparent or colorable right to hold and continue such possession; spoken of as the lowest and most imperfect degree of title. 2 Bl. Comm. 195; Birdwell v. Burleson, 31 Tex. Civ. App. 31, 72 S. W. 446.—Natural possession. That by which a man detains a thing corporeally, as, by occupying a house, cultivating ground, or retaining a movable in possession; natural possession is also defined to be the corporeal detention of a thing which We possess as belonging to us, without any title to that possession or with a title which is void. Civ. Code La. 1900, arts. 3428, 3480. And see Railroad Co. v. Le Rosen, 52 La. Ann. 192, 26 South. 854; Sunol v. Hepburn, 1 Cal. 262. —Open possession. [oxssession of real property is said to be ‘‘open” when held without concealment or attempt at secrecy, or with- ‘out being covered up in the name of a third rson, or otherwise attempted to be withdrawn ‘from sight, but in such a manner that any person interested can ascertain who is actually in possession by proper observation and inquiry. See Bass v. Pease, 79 Ill. App. 318.—Peace= able possession. See PEACEABLE.—Posses= sion money. I[n English law. The man whom the sheriff puts in possession of goods taken under a writ of fieri facias is entitled, while he continues so in possession, to a certain sum of money per diem, which is thence termed “passession money.” ‘The amount is 3s, Gd. per day if he is boarded, or 5s. per day if he is not boarded. Brown.—Possession, writ of. ‘Where the judgment in an action of ejectment is for the delivery of the land claimed, or its possession, this writ is used to put the plaintiff 1m possession. It is in the nature of execution. —Quasi possession is to a right what possession is to a thing; it is the exercise or enjoyment of the right, not necessarily the continuous exercise, but such an exercise as shows an intention to exercise it at any time when desired. vce ore nae ossession. By this term is meant a struggle for possession on the land itself, not such a contest as is waged in the courts, or possession gained by an act of trespass, such as building a fence. Spiers v. Duane, 54 Cal. 177; Lobdell v. Keene, 85 Minn. 90, 88 N. W. 426; Dyer v. Reitz, 14 Mo. App. 43.—Unity of possession. Joint possession ‘of two rights by several titles, as where a lessee of land acquires the title in fee-simple, which extinguishes the lease. The term also describes one of the essential properties of a joint estate, each of the tenants having the entire possession as well of every parcel as of the whole. 2 BI. ‘Comm. 182.—Vacant possession. .An estate which has been abandoned, vacated, or forsaken by the tenant. In the older books, “possession” is sometimes used as the synonym of “sefsin;” but, strictly speaking, they are entirely different terms. “The difference between possession and seisin is : Lessee for years is possessed, and yet the lessor is still seised; and there- ‘fore the terms of law are that of chattels a man is possessed, whereas in feoffments, gifts in tail, and leases for life he is described as ‘seised.’” Noy, Max. 64. - “Possession” is used in some of the books in the sense of property. “A possession is an hereditament or chattel.” Finch, Law, b. 2, e. 3. Sosneusion is a cea title where no better title appears. 20 Vin. Abr. 278. Possession is nine-tenths of the law. This adage is not to be taken as true to the full extent, so as to mean that the person in possession can only be ousted by one whose title is nine times better than his, but it places in a strong light the legal truth that every claimant must succeed by the strength of his own title, and not by the weakness of his antagonist’s. Wharton.
POSSESSIONmain
Rapalje & Lawrence • 1883
(977) tinguished from possessio naturalis, otherwise called nuda detentio, which was a possessing tatûs either to defend the county against the king's enemies, or to keep the peace, or to pursue felons. Persons failing to obey the summons are liable to fine and imprisonment. 2 Steph. Com. 628; 4 Id. possession.-Brown. 254; Stat. 13 Hen. IV. c. 7. POSSESSED, (defined). 1 Wash. (Va.) 52. (equivalent to " "ownership" in 22 Conn. 462, 472. (in tax act). 3 Mass. 428, 429. a will). (978) being under the control of any one, it is Holl. Jur. 129.) This is called the "right not possessed; hence, if a piece of land is deserted and left without fences or other signs of occupation, it is not in the possession of any one, and the possession is said to be vacant. The question whether possession of land is vacant is of importance in actions for recovering possession, as in such cases service of the writ is effected by posting a copy of it on part of the land. Rules of Court, ix. 8. See SERVICE. of possession."* Ordinarily, possession (unless combined with other elements) does not affect the question of ownership; and, therefore, if A., being wrongfully in possession of a thing, conveys it to B., В. cannot retain it against the true owner, even though he may have believed A. to be the true owner and paid him the value of the thing. But in a few cases possession is sufficient to enable a person without title to give a perfect title to a bonâ fide acquirer. Thus, if A. steals money or a negotiable instrument from B. and transfers it for value to C., who has no notice of the theft, B. cannot claim it from C. (Miller v. Race, 1 Burr. 452; 1 Sm. Lead. Cas. 538. See EARMARK; MARKET OVERT; NEGOTIABLE.) So, under the English Factors Acts (q. v.), a person in possession of goods belonging to another may, in certain cases, sell or pledge them, so as to give a good title to the purchaser or pledgee. As to long-continued adverse possession, see infra, & 10. 2. "Possession" as opposed to "enjoyment," "reversion," &c. -Possession does not necessarily imply use or enjoyment; thus, a warehouseman has possession of the goods entrusted to him, without having the use of them. But inasmuch as the use of property cannot be had without possession, the term "possession" is frequently used as implying use and enjoyment, and in this sense is opposed to "reversion," "remainder," "expectancy," "action," &c.; thus, a tenant for life in possession is one who has the immediate benefit of the property, (e. g. by occupation, receipt of the rents or income, 24. Criminal law. In criminal law, &c.,) as opposed to a tenant in remainder, whose right to the enjoyment of the property is deferred (see ESTATE, 9 et seq.); a chose in possession is a chattel which can be immediately used, such as a book, while a chose in action is merely the right to obtain possession of a chattel, as in the case of a debt. 2 Bl. Com. 396. See CHOSE; (979) tioneer. (Williams v. Millington, 1 H. Bl. 29. Adverse ab initio, or by matter 81, cited in Woolfe v. Horne, 2 Q. B. D. subsequent.-Adverse possession is of 358.) So the right may be absolute, i. e. two kinds, according as it was adverse good against all persons; or relative, i. e. good against all with certain exceptions. Thus, a carrier or borrower of goods has a right to their possession against all the world except the owner. from the beginning, or has become so by matter subsequent. Thus, if a mere trespasser takes possession of A.'s property, and retains it against him, his possession is adverse ab initio. But if A. grants a lease 6. Derivative possession. In jurisof land to B., or B. obtains possession of prudence, the possession of a lessee, bailee, the land as A.'s bailiff, or guardian, or licensee, &c., is called "derivative posses-trustee, his possession can only become sion," while in law the possessory interest adverse by some change in his position. of such a person, considered with referIn the case of a lessee, his possession ence to his rights against third persons becomes adverse (1) if he discontinues who interfere with his possession, is usupayment of rent. (Stat. 3 and 4 Will. IV. ally called a "special" or "qualified propс. 27, 23.) This section abolished the conerty," meaning a limited right of ownertrary rule which formerly prevailed, and it ship. Holl. Jur. 127 et seq. See PROPERTY. is hence sometimes said that the statute 7. Wrongful possession.-Possesabolished the old rule of non-adverse sion without right is called "wrongful" or "adverse," according as the rights of the owner or those of the possessor are considered. Wrongful or naked possession is where a person takes possession of property to which he is not entitled, so that the possession and the right of possession are in one person, and the right to possession in another. Where an owner is wrongfully dispossessed he has a right of action to recover it, or, if he has an opportunity, he can exercise the remedy of recaption in the case of goods, or of entry in the case of land. (See ENTRY, 23; RECAPTION.) Formerly, the doctrine of wrongful posses sion was of more importance than now, owing to the peculiar rules applicable to disseisin, intrusion, feoffments, &c. See the subject discussed in Taylor v. Horde, 1 Burr. 60; 2 Sm. Lead. Cas. 681. 8. Adverse possession.-Adverse possession is a possession inconsistent with the right of the true owner; in other words, where a person possesses property in a manner in which he is not entitled to possess it, and without anything to show that he possesses it otherwise than as owner, i. e. with the intention of excluding all persons from it, including the rightful owner, he is in adverse possession of it. Thus, if A. is in possession of a field of B.'s, he is in adverse possession of it, unless there is something to show that his possession is consistent with a recognition of B.'s title. Ward v. Carttar, L. R. 1 Eq. 29. possession. Or (2) if he pays rent to a person claiming the land adversely to the rightful owner, and does not afterwards pay any rent to the rightful owner; in the latter case the rule only applies, in England, if the rent amounts to 20s. or upwards. (Id. 29.) In the case of persons other than lessees, the rule seems to be that possession is never considered adverse if it can be referred to a lawful title, and that where a person obtains possession by a permissive or fiduciary title, or by his own agreement, or by judgment of law (e. g. under an elegit), he and all claiming under him are presumed to hold possession according to that right. Thomas 2. Thomas, 2 K. & J. 83; Pelly v. Bascomb, 4 Giff. 394; Saunders v. Annealey, 2 Sch. & L. 73; Nepean v. Doe, 2 Sm. Lead. Cas. 584, and the cases referred to in Shelf. R. P. Stat. 148. 10. Effects of adverse possession. -Adverse possession not only entitles the adverse possessor, like every other possessor, to be protected in his possession against all who cannot show a better title, (supra, & 3,) but also, if the adverse possessor remains in possession for a certain period of time, produces the effect either of barring the right of the true owner, (the Land Transfer Act, 1875, provides (221) that as against a registered proprietor under the act there is said to be no acquisition of title by adverse possession,) and thus converting the possessor into the owner, or of depriving the true owner of (980) his right of action to recover his property,* (see LIMITATION, 26; PRESCRIPTION;) and this although the true owner is ignorant of the adverse possessor being in occupation. Rains v. Buxton, 14 Ch. D. 537. With reference to the mode of its exercise, possession is of several kinds. ? 11. Actual, or in fact.-A person has actual possession (de facto possession, possession in fact,) of a thing when he exercises physical control over it. Thus, a person who holds a thing in his hand has actual possession of it, and the lessee of a house is in actual possession of it while he occupies it. For instances of actual possession, see Lows v. Telford, 1 App. Cas. 414; Coverdale v. Charlton, 4 Q. B. D. 118. As to what is "actual possession" within the meaning of the Reform Act, see Wms. Sett. 14; Hadfield's Case, L. R. 8 C. P. 306. 12. Constructive, or in law. -A person has constructive possession (or possession in law) (1) when some one representing him has actual possession of the thing. Thus, if A., the owner of the land, leases it to B., A. has constructive possession by B., and if A. dies intestate, leaving C. his heir, C. is immediately in constructive possession of the land by B., although he has never had actual possession; (2) a person may have constructive possession of one thing because he has actual possession of another; thus, if a person is in legal possession of a house, thing at the same time. In re Fells, 4 Ch. D. 509. 214. Apparent and formal possession. Under the Bills of Sale Act, (Stat. 41 and 42 Vict. c. 31; Robs. Bankr. 459,) the validity of an unregistered bill of sale frequently depends upon whether the owner of the goods remains in "apparent possession" of them, having merely given "formal possession" to the creditor. Thus, where the holder of an unregistered bill of sale of furniture put a man into the house, but did not interfere with the furniture in such a manner as to show that it had been taken out of the debtor's control, it was held that the possession so taken was merely formal, and that the goods remained in the apparent possession of the debtor. (Ex parte Lewis, L. R. 6 Ch. 626. See 22 4 and 8 of the act.) As to possession excluding the doctrine of reputed ownership, see Ex parte National Ass. Co., 10 Ch. D. 408. See BILL OF SALE, 2 4, n. As to possession in the law of bankruptcy, see ORDER AND DISPOSITION; RE- (981) man be disseised of an acre of land, the disseisee hath jus proprietatis, the disseisor hath jus possessionis (but see 2 Bl. Com. 195); and if the disseisee release to the disseisor, hee hath jus proprietatis et possessionis." Co. Litt. 266 a. See SEISIN; DROIT; TENANCY IN COMMON, (what words create in a will). 15 Wend. (N. Y.) 615; 5 Binn. (Pa.) 16, 18; 2 Watts (Pa.) 185; 8 Com. Dig. 447. TENANCY, JOINT. - See JOINT TEN-
POSSESSIONn.
Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913
The act or state of possessing, or holding as one's own. The having, holding, or detention of property in one's power or command; actual seizin or occupancy; ownership, whether rightful or wrongful. The thing possessed; that which any one occupies, owns, or controls; in the plural, property in the aggregate; wealth; dominion; as, foreign possessions. When the young man heard that saying, he went away sorrowful, for he had great possessions. Matt. xix. 22. Ananias, with Sapphira his wife, sold a possession. Acts v. 1. The house of Jacob shall possess their possessions. Ob. 17. The state of being possessed or controlled, as by an evil spirit, or violent passions; madness; frenzy; as, demoniacal possession. How long hath this possession held the man Shak. To give possession, to put in another's power or occupancy. -- To put in possession. (a) To invest with ownership or occupancy; to provide or furnish with; as, to put one in possession of facts or information. (b) (Law) To place one in charge of property recovered in ejectment or writ of entry. -- To take possession, to enter upon, or to bring within one's power or occupancy. -- Writ of possession (Law), a precept directing a sheriff to put a person in peaceable possession of property recovered in ejectment or writ of entry.
POSSESSIONv.
Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913
To invest with property. [Obs.]
possessionverb
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
To invest with property.
possessionnoun
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
A control or occupancy of something for which one does not necessarily have private property rights. | Something that is owned. | An ownership; a taking, a holding, keeping something as one's own. | A territory under the rule of another country. | The condition or affliction of being possessed by a demon or other supernatural entity. | The condition of being under the control of strong emotion or madness. | A control of the ball; the opportunity to be on the offensive. | A disposal of the ball during a game, i.e. a kick or a handball. | A syntactic relationship between two nouns or nominals that may be used to indicate ownership.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In