PLEA

7 definitions found across Law Mind sources

PLEAAuthored
The Law Mind • 1588 words
Definition
A plea is a formal response or allegation made by a party in a legal proceeding. The term carries distinct meanings depending on procedural context, and its significance has shifted substantially across the history of Anglo-American law. 1. Criminal procedure (modern primary meaning). A defendant's formal response to a criminal charge, entered at arraignment. The standard options are guilty, not guilty, and — where permitted — no contest (nolo contendere). The plea determines whether the case proceeds to trial or resolves through sentencing. 2. Common-law pleading. A written allegation of fact filed by the defendant in response to the plaintiff's declaration. Distinguished from a demurrer (which contests legal sufficiency) and a replication (the plaintiff's response to the plea). This is the meaning that dominated English and early American civil practice before code pleading displaced it. 3. Equity practice. A special answer to a bill in equity that raises one or more specific grounds why the suit should be dismissed, delayed, or barred — without fully traversing the plaintiff's allegations. Equity pleas were more limited in scope than common-law pleas and operated by a distinct logic. 4. Old English / archaic. A suit or action itself. The "Court of Common Pleas" preserves this usage, as does the formulaic declaration that a defendant has been summoned "to answer the plaintiff in a plea of debt." This meaning is obsolete in practice but appears throughout historical records and original jurisdiction labels. ---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): An appeal, petition, or urgent entreaty; an excuse or apology; an allegation made in support of a cause. Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): That which is alleged by a party in support of his cause; in a stricter sense, an allegation of fact as distinguished from a demurrer; in modern practice, the defendant's answer to the plaintiff's declaration. The everyday sense of "plea" — an earnest appeal or entreaty ("a plea for mercy") — bleeds into legal writing in ways that can mislead. A criminal defendant does not "plead" in the sense of begging; the act is a formal, procedurally regulated response with fixed options. Conversely, when laypeople say a defendant "pleaded guilty," the usage is technically correct but often misunderstood as confession rather than as a structured legal act carrying specific constitutional and procedural requirements. ---
Common Confusion
PLEA vs. PLEADING: A plea is one type of pleading — specifically the defendant's responsive allegation — but "pleadings" as a category encompasses all formal allegations by all parties (declaration/complaint, answer, replication, etc.). In modern federal practice, "pleadings" has a defined, limited meaning under the rules; "plea" in civil contexts is largely archaic. In criminal practice, "plea" remains the dominant term and "pleading" is rarely used. PLEA vs. MOTION: A plea in the historical sense raises factual grounds for defeat of the action; a motion raises procedural or legal grounds. In modern criminal practice, the distinction blurs because defendants raise defenses both by plea (guilty/not guilty) and by pretrial motions, but the two acts are structurally different. GUILTY PLEA vs. NOLO CONTENDERE: Both resolve a criminal case without trial, but a nolo contendere plea cannot be used as an admission in subsequent civil litigation. Researchers conflating the two miss significant collateral-consequences distinctions. ---
Core Elements
In criminal procedure, a valid guilty plea requires: 1. Voluntariness. The plea must be free from coercion, threats, or improper inducements. 2. Knowing and intelligent waiver. The defendant must understand the nature of the charge, the rights being waived (trial by jury, confrontation, self-incrimination), and the consequences of the plea. 3. Factual basis. Most jurisdictions require the court to satisfy itself that a factual basis exists for the plea before accepting it. 4. Competence. The defendant must be competent to enter the plea at the time it is made. These elements derive from constitutional doctrine and are enforceable on collateral review. Their absence can render a plea subject to withdrawal or vacation. ---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES PLEA IN BAR: A plea that, if successful, permanently bars the plaintiff's action. Examples include pleas of res judicata, former recovery, and the statute of limitations. PLEA IN ABATEMENT: A plea that defeats the current proceeding on technical or procedural grounds — defective process, wrong venue, misnomer — without reaching the merits. Does not bar a new, corrected action. PLEA IN DISCHARGE: Admits the plaintiff's demand but asserts it has been satisfied or extinguished — by payment, release, accord and satisfaction, or similar. PLEA IN EXCUSE: Admits the act complained of but asserts justification or excuse — as in a plea of son assault demesne (the plaintiff provoked the defendant). DILATORY PLEA: Any plea that delays rather than defeats — including pleas in abatement and pleas to the jurisdiction. PEREMPTORY PLEA: A plea that goes to the merits and, if successful, conclusively defeats the action. Pleas in bar are peremptory. SPECIAL PLEA: In criminal practice, a plea that raises a specific defense beyond the general issue — such as former jeopardy, pardon, or statute of limitations. PLEA OF GUILTY / NOT GUILTY / NOLO CONTENDERE: The three recognized responses to a criminal charge in American courts. Insanity pleas and Alford pleas represent procedural variants recognized in some jurisdictions. ---
Why It Matters in Research
The word "plea" is a trap for researchers moving across time periods or between civil and criminal sources. In sources predating the late nineteenth century, "plea" in a civil context almost always refers to a formal common-law pleading — not a criminal court proceeding. When Blackstone or early American reporters use "plea," they are typically describing defendant's allegations of fact, not anything resembling a modern guilty plea. The modern criminal-procedure meaning was not the dominant usage until well into the twentieth century. In equity sources, "plea" means something different still — a targeted special answer invoking a discrete defense, governed by equity pleading rules that have no direct analog in code or rules-based practice. Bouvier's treatment is particularly useful here because equity pleading survived longer in American practice than in England. The phrase "common pleas" appears throughout historical court records and jurisdictional titles. Researchers encountering "Court of Common Pleas," "hold pleas," or "plea of debt" in pre-1900 sources should understand these as jurisdictional and procedural markers, not references to criminal pleas. For criminal procedure research, the constitutional requirements for valid pleas — voluntariness, knowing waiver, factual basis — developed primarily through twentieth-century doctrine. Pre-1950 criminal procedure sources treat plea-taking with far less procedural formality than modern practice demands. Historical sources will not reflect modern collateral-consequences doctrine, plea withdrawal standards, or the structural implications of plea bargaining, which became the dominant mode of criminal case resolution in the second half of the twentieth century. Jurisdictional variation is material for plea withdrawal, nolo contendere availability, and Alford plea recognition. Researchers should not assume uniform rules across states. ---
Historical Dictionary Support
The historical dictionaries converge on the civil and procedural dimensions of "plea" and are largely silent on or peripheral to the modern criminal meaning — which reflects how late the criminal usage became dominant. Black's (both editions) leads with the archaic "suit or action" meaning, explicitly noting its survival in formal declarations ("summoned to answer the plaintiff in a plea of debt"). This is sound historical guidance: the word's oldest legal meaning is essentially synonymous with "action," and the common-law procedural meaning developed from there. Bouvier offers the most detailed treatment of equity pleas, distinguishing among pleas that dismiss, delay, or bar the suit — a tripartite structure that is genuinely useful for equity practice research and reflects Mitford's and Story's equity pleading treatises. Rapalje & Lawrence's entry is notable for its attention to how pleas function in the issue-joining process: a plea is not merely defensive in isolation but is part of the sequential narrowing of dispute that common-law pleading was designed to accomplish. This structural point is often lost in modern accounts. Anderson's follows the standard progression from ancient to common-law usage without significant divergence. What the historical dictionaries do not provide: any treatment of the modern criminal plea as a constitutional act, plea bargaining as a systemic practice, or collateral consequences of plea entry. For these, historical dictionaries are simply the wrong source. The modern criminal plea is a creature of twentieth-century constitutional doctrine and institutional practice, not of common-law pleading tradition. ---
Jurisdictional Note
Nolo contendere pleas are not available in all states and are subject to varying judicial discretion even where authorized. Alford pleas — where a defendant pleads guilty while maintaining factual innocence — are recognized federally and in most states, but a minority of states decline to accept them. Plea withdrawal standards differ significantly between pre-sentence and post-sentence contexts, and vary across jurisdictions. ---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
criminal_198: Arraignment and Entry of Plea (The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia) criminal_202: Plea Bargaining — Law, Practice, and Judicial Oversight (The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia) criminal_203: Guilty Pleas — Voluntariness, Collateral Consequences, and Withdrawal (The Law Mind Criminal Law Encyclopedia) ---
Related Terms
Pleading — Arraignment — Guilty Plea — Nolo Contendere — Alford Plea — Plea Bargain — Demurrer — Declaration — Answer — Plea in Bar — Plea in Abatement — Issue — Joinder in Issue — Replication — Court of Common Pleas — Waiver — Voluntariness — Collateral Consequences — Special Plea — Dilatory Plea
PLEAmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
In old English law. A suit or action. Thus, the power to "hold pleas" is the power to take cognizance of actions or suits; so "common pleas" are actions or suits between private persons. And this meaning of the word still appears in the modern dec-nical, but colloquial. larations, where it is stated, e. g., that the defendant "has been summoned to answer the plaintiff in a plea of debt."
PLEAmain
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910
In old English law. A suit or action. Thus, the power to “hold pleas” is the power to take cognizance of actions or suits; so “common pleas” are actions or Suits between private persons. And this meaning of the word still appears in the modern declarations, where it is stated, e. g., that the defendant “has been summoned to answer the plaintiff in a plea of debt.” In common-law practice. A pleading; any one in the series of pleadings. More particularly, the first pleading on the Qart of the defendant. In the strictest sense, the answer which the defendant in an action at law makes to the plaintiff's declaration, and in which he sets up matter of fact as defense, thus distinguished from a demurrer, which interposes objections on grounds of In equity. <A special answer showing or relying upon one or more things as a cause. why the sult should be either dismissed or delayed or barred. Mitf. Eq. Pl. 219; Coop. Eq. Pl. 2238. A short statement, in response to a bill in equity, of facts which, if inserted in the bill, would render it demurrable; while an answer is a complete statement of the defendant’s case, and contains answers to any interrogatories ares pene may have administered. Hunt, Eq. p 9 Cc e —Affirmative plea. One which sets up a single fact. not apnearing in the bill. or sets up a number of circumstances all tending to establish a single fact, which fact, if existing, destroys the comnlainsnt’s case. Potts v. Potts (N. J. Ch.) 42 Atl. One which is partly affirmative and partly negative. Baldwin v. Elizabeth, 42 N. J. Eq. 11, 6 Atl. 275; Potts v. Potts (N. J. Ch.) 42 Atl. 1055.—Bad plea. One which is unsound or insufficient in form or substance, or which does not technically answer or correspond with the pleading which preceded it in the action.—Common pleas. Common causes or suits; civil actions brought and prosecuted between subjects or citizens, as of the crown or criminal cases.—Counterplea. A plea to some matter incidental to the main object of the suit, and out of the direct line of pleadings. In the more ancient system of pleading, counter pice _was applied to what was, in effect, a replication to aid prayer, (q. v.;) that is, where a tenant for life or other limited interest in land, having an action brought against him in respect to the title to such land, prayed in aid of the lord or reversioner for his better defense, that which the demandant alleged against either uest was called a _“counter-plea.” Cowell.—Dilatory leas. See DILATORY.—Double plea. One aving the: technical fault of duplicity; one consisting of several distinct and independent matters alleged to the same point and requiring different answers—False Soe A sham plea. See infra. And see People v. McCum1055.—-Anomalous plea. . istinguished from pleas ‘Steph. Pl. ber, 18 N. Y. 321, 72 Am. Dec. 515; Pierson v. Evans, 1 Wend. (N. Y.) 30.—Foreign plea. A plea objecting to the jurisdiction of a judge, on the ground that he had not cognizance of the subject-matter of the suit. Cowell.—Nege ative plea. One which does not undertake to answer the various allegations of the bill, but specifically denies some particular fact or matter the existence of which is essential to entitle the complainant to any relief. See Potts v. Potts (N. J. Ch.) 42 Atl. 1056.—Peremptory pleas. ‘Pleas in bar’ are so termed in contradistinction to that class of pleas called “dilatory pleas.” The former, viz., peremptory pleas, are usually pleaded to the merits of the action, with the view of raising a material issue between the parties; while the latter class, viz., dilatory pleas, are generally pleaded with a view of retarding the plaintiff's proceedings, and not for the purpose of raising ar issue upon which the parties may go to trial and settle the point in dispute. eremptory pleas are also called ‘“‘pleas in bar,” while dilatory pleas are said to be in abatement only. Brown.—Plea in abatement. In practice. A plea which goes to ebete the plaintiff's action; that is, to suspend or put it off for the era 3 _Bl. Comm. 801; Hurst v. Everett C. C.) 21 Fed. 221: Wilson v. Winchester & P. R. Co. (C. 0.) 82 Fed. 18: Middlebrook v. Ames, 5 Stew. & P. (Ala.) 166.—Plea in bar. In practice. A plea which goes to bar the plaintiff's action; that is, to defent it absolutely and entirely. 1 Burrill, Pr. 162: 3 Bl. Comm: 03; Rawson vy. Knight, 71 Me. 102; Norton v. Winter, 1 Or. 48. 62 Am. Dec. 2973 Wilson v. Knox County, 182 Mo. 387, 34 8. W. 45.=<= Plea in discharge. One which admits that the plaintiff had a cause of action, but shows that it was discharged by some subsequent or collateral matter, as, payment or accord and satisfaction. Nichols v. Cecil, 106 Tenn. 455, 61 S. W. 768—Plea in reconvention. In the civil law. <A plea which sets up. new matter, not in defense to the action, but by way. of cross-complaint, set-off, or counterclaim. Plea of release. One which admits the cause. of action, but sets forth a release subsequently executed by the party authorized to release the claim. Landis v, Morrissey, 69 Cal. 83, 10 Pac. 258.—Plea side. The plea side of a court is that branch or department of the court which entertains or takes cognizance of civil actions and suits, as distinguished from its criminal or crown devartment. Thus the court of king’s bench. is said to have a plea side and &.crown or criminal side; the one branch or department of it being devoted to the cognizance of civil actions, the other to criminal proceedings and matters peculiarly concerning the crown. So the court of exchequer is said to have a plea side and a crown side; the one being appropriated to civil actions, the other to matters of revenue. Brown.—Pleas of the crown. In English law. A phrase now emPloyed to signify criminal causes, in which the king is a party. Formerly it signified royal causes for offenses of a greater magnitude than mere misdemeanors.—Pleas roll. In English practice. A record upon which are entered all the pleadings in a cause, in their regular order, and the issne.—Pure plea. In equity pleading. One which relies wholly on some matter outside those referred to in the bill: as a plea of a release on a settled account.—Sham plea. A false plea: a plea of false or fictitious matter, subtly drawn so as to entrap an opponent, or create delay. $8 Chit. Pr. 729, 730. A vexatious or false defense, resorted to under the old system of pleading for purposes of delay and annoyance. . Mr. Chitty defines sham pleas to be pleas so palpably and manifestly untrue that the court will assume them to be so: leas manifestly absurd. When answers or efenses admit of lawyer-like argument, such as‘courts should listen fo, they are not “sham,” im. the sense of the statute. When it needs argument to prove that an answer or demurrer is frivolous, it is not frivolous, and should not be’ stricken off. To warrant this summary mode’ of disposing of a defense, the mere reading of the pleadings should be sufficient to disclose, without deliberation and without a doubt, that the defense is sham or irrelevant. ° Cottrill. v. Cramer, 40 Wis. .559.—Special plea. A 8 al kind of plea in bar, distinguished by is name from the general issue, ‘and consisting usually of some new affirmative matter, though it may also be in the form of a traverse or denial, See Steph. Pl. 52, 162; Allen v. New tlaven & N. Co., 49 Conn. 245.—Special plea fn. bar. One which advances new matter. lt differs from the general, in this: that: the latter. denies some: material allegation, but never advances: new matter. Gould, Pl.c. 2, § 38
PLEAmain
Rapalje & Lawrence • 1888
3. Issues in an action. - When the parties to an action have answered one another's pleadings in such a manner that they have arrived at some material point or matter affirmed on one side and denied on the other, and the party whose turn it is to plead adds nothing to his previous pleadings, the parties are said to be "at issue;" the last pleading is called a "joinder in issue" (q. v.), and the question thus raised is called the issue, or one of the issues, in the action. (Co. Litt. 126a.) 11. Issue of writs, &c. -A writ, Frequently issue is joined on one question in the case, and the pleadings continue as to the other questions; where the defendant sets up a counter-claim, issue is generally joined on the original claim before it is joined on the counter-claim. 4. Preparation of issues. If the pleadings do not succeed in sufficiently defining the issues in dispute between the parties, the judge may direct the parties to prepare issues, i. e. to agree upon a subpæna, or similar document, is said to be issued when it is delivered by the proper officer of the court to the party at whose instance it is sued out, after having been sealed or otherwise marked to denote its official character. See PRÆCIPE. ISSUE, (defined). 2 Brock. (U. S.) 122; 30 Conn. 488; 12 B. Mon. (Ky.) 655; 4 Mon. (Ky.) 205; Steph. Pl. 25. (as a word of purchase). 2 Beas. (N. J.) 168; 9 Mod. 236; 2 Str. 803.
PLEAn.
Websters Unabridged Dictionary (1913) • 1913
That which is alleged by a party in support of his cause; in a stricter sense, an allegation of fact in a cause, as distinguished from a demurrer; in a still more limited sense, and in modern practice, the defendant's answer to the plaintiff's declaration and demand. That which the plaintiff alleges in his declaration is answered and repelled or justified by the defendant's plea. In chancery practice, a plea is a special answer showing or relying upon one or more things as a cause why the suit should be either dismissed, delayed, or barred. In criminal practice, the plea is the defendant's formal answer to the indictment or information presented against him. A cause in court; a lawsuit; as, the Court of Common Pleas. See under Common. The Supreme Judicial Court shall have cognizance of pleas real, personal, and mixed. Laws of Massachusetts. That which is alleged or pleaded, in defense or in justification; an excuse; an apology. "Necessity, the tyrant's plea." Milton. No plea must serve; 't is cruelty to spare. Denham. An urgent prayer or entreaty. Pleas of the crown (Eng. Law), criminal actions.
pleanoun
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
Wiktionary contributorsCC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.
An appeal, petition, urgent prayer or entreaty. | An excuse; an apology. | That which is alleged or pleaded, in defense or in justification. | That which is alleged by a party in support of his cause. | An allegation of fact in a cause, as distinguished from a demurrer. | The defendant’s answer to the plaintiff’s declaration and demand. | A cause in court; a lawsuit; as, the Court of Common Pleas.
pleaverb
Wiktionary (English) • 2026
Wiktionary contributorsCC BY-SA 4.0 • via Kaikki
Extracted and formatted for display by Law Mind. Source link opens the current Wiktionary page and its contributor history; it is not a frozen copy of this extract.
To plead; to argue.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In