Definition
In old English and Latin legal usage, *pertinens* (plural: *pertinentia* or *pertinentiæ*) means "pertaining" or "belonging to" — a term used to describe something that is appurtenant or appendant to a principal subject, typically land or an estate. It functions as an adjective or participial qualifier in legal instruments and pleadings, signifying that a subordinate thing is legally attached to or incident upon a primary thing.
The related noun form *pertinentiæ* refers to appurtenances themselves — the collection of rights, easements, outbuildings, or other incidents that belong to and pass with a principal property unless expressly excepted.
In the laws of Canute, *pertinens* carried a secondary and distinct meaning: a relative or kinsman (*cognatus*), reflecting the term's broader Latin sense of "one who belongs" to a family or group. This usage is archaic and confined to pre-Conquest Anglo-Saxon legal records.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): "Pertinent" in modern English means relevant or applicable to a matter at hand. The related form "pertaining" means belonging or relating to something.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "Pertaining" — belonging; related; having reference; as, lands and appurtenances thereunto pertaining.
The gap between common and legal meaning is narrow but consequential. In common English, "pertinent" primarily signals relevance or logical connection. In the legal Latin form *pertinens*, the term carries a possessory and structural meaning — physical or legal annexation, not mere relevance. A researcher encountering *pertinens* in an old deed or plea roll should read it as a term of conveyancing, not of logical relation.
---
Why It Matters in Research
*Pertinens* and its noun form *pertinentiæ* appear most frequently in medieval and early modern English property records: fee farm grants, charters, inquisitions post mortem, and conveyances drafted in Latin or law French. Researchers working in pre-1733 English legal records (before Latin was formally abolished in court proceedings) will encounter these terms in boilerplate appurtenance clauses — formulas such as *cum pertinentiis* ("with the appurtenances") were routine in conveyancing instruments.
The critical research trap is treating *pertinens* as merely decorative language. Courts construed appurtenance clauses substantively: what passed *cum pertinentiis* under a conveyance was a live question of title, and the scope of what "pertained" to a manor or messuage could determine whether easements, commons rights, or dependent tenements transferred to the grantee. Historical sources that discuss appurtenance doctrine are therefore the primary analytical companions to any instrument using *pertinens* or *pertinentiæ*.
The secondary meaning in the laws of Canute — *pertinens* as kinsman — is essentially a philological curiosity for most legal researchers, but it matters for anyone examining pre-Conquest Anglo-Saxon law, inheritance customs, or early English kin-liability rules. Conflating the property meaning with this kinship meaning in that context would produce a fundamental misreading.
Scotch law used the vernacular form *pertinents* as the direct equivalent of *pertinentiæ*, and the term survives into modern Scots property law longer than its English counterpart. Researchers working in Scottish title records or comparing English and Scots conveyancing doctrine should be alert to this parallel usage, which Spelman and Burrill both note.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Burrill's Law Dictionary is the primary shelf source for this term and provides the essential framework: the Latin root (*pertinere*, to belong), the English legal equivalents (appurtenant, appendant), the key authority (Coke, Co. 38a, Tyrringham's Case), and the anomalous Canute-era kinship usage sourced to Spelman.
Burrill does not elaborate the substantive doctrine governing what things qualify as *pertinentiæ* under a grant — that analysis belongs to Coke on Littleton and to treatises on real property rather than to a law dictionary entry. Researchers should treat Burrill's entry as an orientation point, not a doctrinal guide.
The Canute reference to Spelman is worth following for Anglo-Saxon legal historians. Spelman's *Glossarium Archaiologicum* remains the foundational source for pre-Conquest Latin legal vocabulary, and his treatment of *pertinens* in the kinship sense is part of a broader examination of early English family-liability and succession customs that have no direct modern equivalent.
No significant divergence exists among historical dictionaries on this term because it is primarily a Latin technical form rather than a contested common-law concept. Its meaning was stable across the period when Latin remained the language of legal instruments.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The term is functionally obsolete in modern English legal practice, having been displaced by the English word "appurtenances" and its statutory successors. In Scots law, *pertinents* persists as a recognized term of art in property descriptions and title conditions, with continued relevance to the interpretation of older title deeds.
---