Definition
Personal property is all property that is not real property. Where real property consists of land and things permanently affixed to it, personal property encompasses the vast residual category: movable things, intangible rights, money, negotiable instruments, intellectual property, and claims enforceable at law or in equity.
Two broad divisions organize the category:
1. Chattels real — Interests in land that are nonetheless treated as personal property for legal purposes, chiefly leaseholds. The term is largely historical but appears frequently in older sources.
2. Chattels personal — All other personal property, further divided into:
a. Choses in possession — Tangible, movable things capable of physical delivery: furniture, livestock, vehicles, goods.
b. Choses in action — Intangible rights enforceable only through legal action: debts, contract rights, negotiable instruments, shares of stock, and intellectual property interests.
In modern usage, "personal property" and "personalty" are interchangeable. Both stand in direct contrast to "real property" or "realty."
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Property belonging to a person, especially movable possessions as distinguished from land or buildings.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Movable or transitory things as distinguished from real property or immovable things. Also referred to loosely as one's belongings or goods.
The common understanding tracks the legal meaning closely enough on the surface, but the gap matters in practice. Ordinary usage focuses on tangible things a person owns and can carry away. Legal usage extends significantly further — encompassing intangible choses in action, intellectual property rights, leasehold interests, and future interests in funds. A non-lawyer reading "personal property" in a will or contract may miss that the term legally reaches rights and claims, not just physical objects.
---
Common Confusion
Personal property is frequently confused with "private property." Private property is a constitutional and political concept describing property held by individuals rather than the state; it cuts across both real and personal property. Personal property is a classification within property law, not a statement about ownership versus public ownership. The two concepts operate on entirely different axes.
Personal property is also confused with "personality" (an archaic variant spelling of "personalty"). In historical sources, "personalty" and "personality" sometimes appear interchangeably, but modern usage reserves "personality" for psychology and treats "personalty" as the correct legal shorthand.
---
Recognized Forms
/SUBTYPES
Tangible personal property — Physical, movable objects: goods, vehicles, equipment, animals.
Intangible personal property — Rights without physical form: bank accounts, intellectual property, securities, contract rights, choses in action.
Chattels real — Leaseholds and other interests in land classified as personal property rather than realty. Largely a term of historical art.
Chose in action — A right to recover money or property through a legal proceeding, treated as personal property. Critically important in historical sources and in bankruptcy, assignment, and succession contexts.
Semi-intangible personal property — A category recognized in some contexts for instruments that embody intangible rights (promissory notes, negotiable instruments), where the paper itself is tangible but the right it represents is not.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The real/personal property divide is foundational to almost every area of property law, and the classification is not always obvious. Several research traps are worth flagging:
Leaseholds as personal property: In historical common law, a tenant's leasehold interest was personal property, not real property. Courts and treatises from the 18th and 19th centuries will classify lease-related disputes under personal property doctrine, not real property doctrine. Researchers expecting leasehold issues to appear under real property headings in older digests will miss material.
Choses in action: The classification of intangible rights as personal property has been contested and evolved significantly. Early common law did not freely allow assignment of choses in action; equity and then statute gradually expanded assignability. Rapalje & Lawrence's coverage of chose in action reflects a period of active doctrinal development. Researchers tracing assignment law or bankruptcy estates must track this evolution carefully — what is freely assignable personal property today was not always so.
Intellectual property: The classification of intellectual property rights (patents, copyrights, trademarks) as personal property is now standard, but the intellectual property entries in historical dictionaries are sparse or absent. The Law Mind Encyclopedia entry on intellectual property as personal property fills this gap and should be consulted alongside historical dictionary sources.
Future interests: Black's Law Dictionary's source material for this entry drifts toward future interests — specifically contingent interests not transmissible to representatives if the holder dies before vesting. This is a meaningful subset of personal property doctrine, not the definition of the term itself. The appearance in the source material signals that future interests in funds and contingent remainders were being analyzed under personal property principles in the period reflected by that edition of Black's. Researchers working on testamentary or trust disputes should note that the personal/real property divide governs transmissibility rules for contingent interests.
Jurisdictional classification in taxation: What counts as personal property for ad valorem tax purposes varies by state. Some states tax intangible personal property; many have abolished such taxes. Researchers working with tax records or property assessment disputes must identify the governing state scheme.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The source material supplied for this entry is fragmented, and neither Black's nor Rapalje & Lawrence provides a clean definitional entry for "personal property" in the excerpts available. This itself is informative: both dictionaries of the relevant period tend to treat personal property as a background category and devote their analytical energy to specific subtypes — particularly chose in action.
Rapalje & Lawrence's extended treatment of chose in action, with citations running through Alabama, New York, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and Wisconsin courts, reflects the live doctrinal questions of the era: what counts as a chose in action, when a promissory note qualifies, how judgments are classified, and what happens to choses in action in bankruptcy. This granular approach tells the researcher where courts were actually fighting about personal property classification — not at the definitional level but at the boundary between subtypes.
Black's reference to future interests not transmissible to representatives illuminates an important corner of personal property doctrine: contingent personal property interests (such as a contingent right to a capital distribution after a life estate) were treated as lapsing at death if not yet vested in possession. This rule has been substantially modified by statute in many jurisdictions, so historical sources reflecting it should not be imported uncritically into modern analysis.
What the historical dictionaries miss, taken together: they do not address intellectual property as personal property with any comprehensiveness, and they are largely silent on the treatment of financial instruments and securities as personal property — categories now central to the field.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The real/personal property distinction is universal in common law jurisdictions, but the treatment of specific items at the margin varies. Some U.S. states classify mobile homes, mineral rights, and growing crops differently from others. Civil law jurisdictions (Louisiana being the primary U.S. example) use a movable/immovable distinction rather than real/personal, which maps closely but not perfectly onto the common law framework.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Personal Property — Intellectual Property as Personal Property (Overview), The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia
---