Definition
A pernor of profits is a person who actually receives or takes the profits arising from land or other property. The term identifies the party who, in practice and in law, stands as the recipient of rents, issues, and other benefits flowing from real property.
The concept carries two closely related dimensions:
1. The person who physically and actually receives profits from land — the one in practical receipt, as distinguished from one who holds a nominal or theoretical entitlement.
2. In the context of uses and trusts (particularly pre-Statute of Uses, 1535), the cestui que use who was both legally entitled to and actually did receive the profits of land held to his or her use. Here, the pernor of profits was the beneficial owner in substance, even where legal title resided elsewhere.
The term derives from the Norman French pernancy (or percipiency), meaning the taking or receipt of something. Pernancy of profits was the act; pernor of profits was the actor.
---
Common Confusion
PERNOR OF PROFITS vs. FEOFFOR / FEOFFEE TO USES: In the medieval use, the feoffee held legal title while the pernor of profits held the beneficial enjoyment. These roles were structurally distinct. Conflating legal title-holder with profit-taker is the central error researchers encounter in feudal land tenure sources.
PERNOR OF PROFITS vs. CESTUI QUE USE: The terms substantially overlap in the context of uses, but they are not synonyms. Cestui que use identifies the beneficiary of the use by status; pernor of profits identifies that same person by function — the actual receipt of land's economic yield. A cestui que use who was not yet receiving profits (for example, a remainder interest not yet in possession) was not yet a pernor.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This is a term of art embedded almost exclusively in pre-modern English real property law and its treatment in historical treatises. Researchers will encounter it principally in three contexts:
First, in materials dealing with feudal tenure, copyhold, and the doctrine of uses before and after the Statute of Uses (1535). Blackstone's Commentaries (Book II) uses pernancy and pernor extensively when explaining how profits of land were conceptualized as separable from seisin and legal title. The 2 Bl. Comm. 163 reference in Black's signals exactly this context.
Second, in cases and treatises involving remainders, reversions, and life estates, where identifying who is the current pernor of profits matters for determining who owes obligations (such as repairs or taxes) and who is entitled to rents during a particular period of possession.
Third, in equity and trust history, where the pernor of profits was, before 1535, the functional equivalent of the modern trust beneficiary. Post-Statute of Uses, the use was executed and the pernor was frequently converted into the legal owner — but historical sources written before or contemporaneously with that statute use the term in its older, equitable sense. Researchers reading across that chronological divide risk importing the wrong meaning.
A practical trap: secondary sources sometimes use pernor of profits loosely to mean any person receiving income from property, stripping away the technical tenure and use-doctrine context. When tracing a term's use in primary sources, treat it as a term with a specific doctrinal home, not a generic description.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The historical dictionaries converge on the same core definition with slight differences in emphasis. Black's (both editions) defines the pernor as "he who receives the profits of lands, etc.; he who has the actual pernancy of the profits" — a definition that foregrounds the act of receipt and its factual character. The qualifier actual is significant: it distinguishes the pernor from one who might have a right to profits not yet realized.
Bouvier adds the most doctrinal texture, tying the term explicitly to the cestui que use and noting that entitlement plus actual receipt together constitute the pernor's status. Bouvier also cites Termes de la Ley, the 16th-century law French glossary, which correctly situates the term in its period of greatest practical use.
What the historical dictionaries collectively underemphasize is the temporal context: pernor of profits as live operating vocabulary belongs to medieval and early modern English land law. By the time these dictionaries were compiled in the 19th century, the term had become primarily a historical and interpretive category — useful for reading older cases and treatises, but not a term structuring contemporary transactions. None of the dictionary entries flag this shift, which can mislead a researcher into treating the term as more current than it was even by 1900.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
property_150: Profits — Right to Take (Profit a Prendre), The Law Mind Property Law Encyclopedia
remedies_42: Accounting of Profits — Disgorgement of Wrongful Gains, The Law Mind Remedies & Equity Encyclopedia
---