Definition
The act of taking or receiving; specifically, the actual receipt of the rents, profits, and other advantages arising from an estate or land. Pernancy refers to the physical or practical enjoyment of an estate's proceeds, as distinguished from the mere legal right to receive them. The person who takes or receives such profits is called a pernor.
The concept appears most often in discussions of estates held in joint tenancy, tenancy in common, or in connection with the legal fiction of uses, where the distinction between who holds legal title and who actually receives the benefit of an estate matters. A cestui que use — the beneficiary of a use — was often described as the pernor of profits, meaning the one who actually enjoyed the estate's returns regardless of who held the nominal legal estate.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): "A taking or reception, as the receiving of rents or tithes in kind, the receiving of profits."
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "A taking or reception, as the receiving of rents or tithes in kind, the receiving of profits. — Blackstone."
In this instance, the common and legal meanings are nearly identical in surface definition, but the distinction worth noting is one of context and weight. In common usage, "pernancy" is simply descriptive. In legal usage, it is a term of art that distinguishes actual receipt of profits from the right to receive them — a difference that carried significant consequence in property law, particularly regarding uses, jointures, and the assignment of dower rights. The common definition does not capture that operative legal distinction.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Pernancy is an archaic term of art that appears almost exclusively in older English property law materials and in American sources that drew directly from Blackstone and Coke. Researchers encountering the word in historical deeds, equity proceedings, or treatises on real property should understand that it signals a question about who is actually receiving the economic benefit of land — a question that frequently determined the resolution of disputes over uses, dower, and co-tenancy arrangements.
The term largely disappeared from American legal writing by the late nineteenth century as the vocabulary of uses was absorbed into modern trust law and as fee simple ownership became the dominant estate form. In contemporary sources, you are far more likely to encounter language about "receipt of rents and profits" or "beneficial enjoyment" where an earlier source would have said "pernancy." Researchers working with Blackstone's Commentaries (particularly Book II) will encounter pernancy in discussions of estates in fee simple and the nature of actual possession, and should resist mapping the term directly onto modern beneficial ownership without accounting for the specific doctrinal context.
The connection to cestui que use is particularly important. In pre-Statute of Uses (1535) materials, and in American equity materials that preserved use-like structures before modern trust law solidified, pernancy was often the operative test for determining who bore the economic substance of an estate. Anderson's Dictionary makes this connection explicit by cross-referencing pernor and cestui que use in the same entry.
One research trap: the word "perception" appears as a near-synonym in several dictionary entries (including Anderson's) and in French-derived legal sources. In this context, "perception" does not mean sensory awareness — it means the act of collecting or gathering, as in perceiving rents. Burrill traces pernancy to the Law French "parner," meaning to take. Researchers working in Norman French legal records or in early Year Books should watch for variant spellings and the French-root forms.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
All four source dictionaries are in close agreement. Black's (both editions), Anderson's, and Burrill's converge on the same core definition — taking or receiving of profits from an estate — and all trace the authority to 2 Blackstone's Commentaries 163. This uniformity reflects that pernancy was a well-settled term rather than a contested one; its meaning was never seriously disputed, only its practical application in specific estate configurations.
Anderson's is the most expansive of the four, adding "enjoyment" as a gloss and explicitly naming the pernor as a cestui que use, which helpfully anchors the term in the law of uses. Burrill adds the Law French etymology, which is useful for tracing the word in pre-modern sources. Black's second edition adds the qualifier "actual pernancy," signaling that the concept carried a distinction between theoretical entitlement and real receipt — a nuance the shorter entries do not develop.
None of the historical dictionaries address the term's decline or provide guidance on how to translate the concept into modern equivalents, which is the gap most likely to trouble contemporary researchers working across temporal periods in the corpus.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Pernancy as a term of art was primarily English in origin and followed the common law into American jurisdictions. Its practical significance varied with each state's treatment of the Statute of Uses and the development of trust law. In jurisdictions that abolished common law estates by statute or codified property law early, the term became obsolete sooner.
---