Definition
An Anglo-Norman and Law French term meaning "country." In historical common law pleading, pays referred to the country — that is, the community of jurors — upon whose verdict a matter was submitted for determination. The phrase most closely associated with the term is the formulaic closing of a pleading that tendered an issue to jury trial: the party declared that they put themselves "upon the country" (sur le pays), signaling consent to trial by jury rather than by other means.
The term is functionally synonymous with pais and appears most often in the compound phrase trial per pays, meaning trial by jury. It does not carry independent substantive legal meaning but rather marks a procedural posture within the common law pleading system.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Third-person singular simple present indicative of "pay" — as in "she pays the bill."
Historical common usage: In ordinary French, pays means country, region, or homeland — a geographic or national unit.
The gap here runs in both directions. Modern English readers encountering pays in a legal text will almost certainly read it as a conjugation of "to pay," which has no connection to its legal meaning. Readers with French will recognize the geographic meaning but may not grasp its technical procedural function in common law pleading. Neither instinct leads to the correct legal interpretation.
---
Common Confusion
PAYS vs. PAIS: These are variant spellings of the same Law French root and are used interchangeably across historical sources. Bouvier and Black both cross-reference one to the other. Researchers should not treat them as distinct terms. The more common form in modern legal historical writing is pais, but pays appears frequently in older printed sources and original pleading records. Search strategies should account for both spellings.
PAYS vs. "pays" (verb): The visual identity of pays with the English verb "to pay" creates a false cognate trap in historical source research. A pleading that reads "puts himself upon the pays" has nothing to do with payment obligations.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working in pre-nineteenth-century common law pleading records, English Year Books, or early American practice manuals will encounter pays as a term of art embedded in formulaic pleading language. Its significance is almost entirely historical: the phrase "put themselves upon the country" (or its Latin and Law French variants) was the standard signal that an issue was being tendered for jury trial, and understanding this language is essential to reading plea rolls and reported cases correctly.
Two research traps are worth flagging:
First, the spelling variation between pays and pais means keyword searches in digitized historical corpora will miss hits unless both forms are queried. Some sources use the forms inconsistently within the same document.
Second, Burrill's entry conflates pays with a discussion of waste committed during pending litigation — a digression that appears to reflect an editorial error or a misplaced passage in the source text. Researchers should not treat Burrill's entry as a reliable standalone guide to this term's meaning. The Black's and Bouvier's entries are the more useful references.
The term has no operative legal meaning in modern practice. Its relevance is confined to historical legal research, legal history scholarship, and the interpretation of early pleading records.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's (1st and 2nd Ed.) and Bouvier's are in agreement: pays means "country" in the Law French sense, and trial per pays is trial by jury. Both cross-reference pais as the primary entry, treating pays as a variant form rather than an independent headword. This cross-referencing is correct and useful.
Burrill's entry is anomalous. The core definition — "and of this they put themselves upon the country" — tracks the standard formulation, but Burrill then pivots to a discussion of waste during litigation, including a note about the etymology and meaning of a separate term (likely festum assaver or a related concept). This appears to be a typographical or editorial artifact from Burrill's original compilation rather than substantive commentary on pays itself. Researchers should treat this portion of the Burrill entry with caution and not read it as reflecting the established meaning of the term.
None of the historical dictionaries discuss pays in the context of payment, which confirms that the financial meaning of "pays" is purely a modern English false cognate and not a source of genuine historical ambiguity in legal texts.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
The core legal concept — trial by the country, jury trial, and the pleading traditions surrounding it — is not directly addressed in the matched encyclopedia entries below, which concern modern payment-related topics. These entries are cross-referenced for researchers who arrived at this entry through a search involving payment concepts and need redirection:
- Equal Pay Act — The Law Mind Employment & Labor Law Encyclopedia (employment_61)
- Failure to Pay Penalty — The Law Mind Tax Encyclopedia (tax_70)
- Pay-if-Paid vs. Pay-when-Paid — The Law Mind Real Estate Transactions & Construction Encyclopedia (realestate_90)
Note: None of these entries relate to the Law French term pays. Researchers seeking the pleading history of jury trial should consult encyclopedia entries on common law pleading, trial by jury, or the general verdict.
---