PARUM

4 definitions found across Law Mind sources

PARUMAuthored
The Law Mind • 662 words
Definition
A Latin adverb meaning "little" or "but little." In legal usage, *parum* appears primarily as a component of Latin maxims rather than as a freestanding legal term. It signals a condition of insufficiency or minimal effect — that something, however formally present, achieves little or nothing of practical consequence. The term is best understood through the maxims in which it operates: 1. *Parum cavet natura* — "Nature takes little heed." Used to observe that natural processes are indifferent to legal arrangements; nature does not pause for legal formalities. 2. *Parum differunt quae re concordant* — "Things differ but little which agree in substance." A principle of substantive construction: where two things are materially equivalent, superficial formal differences are legally insignificant. 3. *Parum est latam esse sententiam, nisi mandetur executioni* — "It is to little purpose that a judgment be pronounced unless it be carried into execution." A statement of the practical dimension of judicial authority: a judgment without enforcement is nearly meaningless.
Common Confusion
*Parum* should not be confused with *parvum* (a neuter adjective meaning "small" as a modifying descriptor) or with *parum* in the sense of a pejorative ("too little" as in an insufficient showing). In legal maxims, *parum* consistently signals practical futility or minimal consequence — not merely smallness in a physical or quantitative sense.
Why It Matters in Research
*Parum* will not appear as a standalone headword in most modern legal research tools. Researchers will encounter it embedded in Latin maxims cited in older equity and common law opinions, particularly in discussions of: — **Substantive equivalence doctrine**: The maxim *parum differunt quae re concordant* surfaces in conveyancing disputes and contract construction cases where parties argue over formal versus substantive differences in instruments. Historical equity courts applied this principle to look past form to substance. — **Enforcement of judgments**: The maxim *parum est latam esse sententiam, nisi mandetur executioni* appears in older discussions of the relationship between judgment and execution, and occasionally in equity opinions addressing the inadequacy of legal remedies — relevant context for understanding why courts of equity developed their distinctive enforcement powers. — **Corpus navigation**: In the Law Mind corpus, *parum* will appear scattered across early American and English decisions, typically without translation. Readers encountering untranslated Latin maxims in pre-twentieth-century opinions should treat *parum* as a signal that the court is invoking a principle of insufficiency or practical nullity. The surrounding maxim will identify the substantive doctrine. Researchers should be alert to truncated or corrupted versions of these maxims in historical reprints, where the full Latin text is sometimes cut mid-phrase by typesetting or transcription errors — the Burrill source material itself demonstrates this problem.
Historical Dictionary Support
The historical dictionaries converge on the bare translation ("little; but little") without elaboration on doctrinal application. Black's first and second editions are nearly identical in their treatment, differing only in that the second edition supplies a fuller citation to *Vandenheuvel v. United Ins. Co.*, 2 Johns. Cas. (N.Y.) 127, anchoring *parum cavet natura* in American case law. Burrill is more ambitious, attempting to include multiple maxims under a single entry, but the surviving text is fragmentary — the entry breaks mid-sentence and transitions without explanation into the adjacent entry for *passagium*. This is a transcription artifact, not a substantive gap in Burrill's original work. None of the historical dictionaries explain the doctrinal contexts in which these maxims were operationally significant. They treat *parum* as a vocabulary item rather than a research tool. Researchers should not rely on these entries alone to understand how the maxims functioned in practice.
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
See Law Mind Encyclopedia: Latin Maxims in Common Law Courts; Judgment and Execution (Historical); Substantive Construction of Instruments.
Related Terms
Maxim — Latin maxims — Parum cavet natura — Parum differunt quae re concordant — Parum est latam esse sententiamnisi mandetur executioni — Execution of judgment — Substantive construction — Res (substance versus form)
PARUMmain
Black's Law Dictionary • 1891
Lat. Little; but little. Parum cavet natura. Nature takes lit- tle heed. 2 Johns. Cas. 127, 166.
PARUMmain
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910
Lat. Little; but little. Parum cavet natura. Nature takes little heed. Vandenheuvel v. United Ins. Co., 2 Johns. Cas. (N. Y.) 127, 166.
PARUMmain
Burrill's Law Dictionary • 1870
Lat. Little; but little. Parum differunt quæ re concordant. Things To convey or transfer. "To pass an esdiffer but little which agree in substance. tate." "Effectual words to pass the in2 Bulstr. 53. "The passing of terest." Id. sect. xxxv. Parum est latam esse sententiam, nisi man-estates." Id. ibid. detur executioni. It is little (or to little PASSAGIUM. L. Lat. [L. Fr. passage, purpose] that judgment be given unless it be committed to execution. Co. Litt. 289. Parum proficit scire quid fieri debet, si non cognoscas quomodo sit facturum. It profits little to know what ought to be done, if you do not know how it is to be done. 2 Inst. 503.

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In