Definition
A commission, historically issued by the Crown in England (and later by executive authority in American states), empowering judges to hear and determine criminal cases — specifically treasons, felonies, and misdemeanors. The phrase is Norman French meaning "to hear and determine." In practice, it named both the commission itself and the court that sat under its authority.
In England, oyer and terminer became the standard designation for the assizes — the periodic circuit courts at which royal judges traveled to hear serious criminal matters. Though the commission was originally issued for extraordinary circumstances (sudden insurrection, grave disorder in a locality), it evolved into a regular feature of the criminal court system.
In the United States, oyer and terminer carried forward as a formal name for certain state criminal courts of general jurisdiction — courts with authority to try the most serious felonies, including capital cases. These courts operated in a number of states well into the nineteenth century and, in some jurisdictions, later still. The term is now largely obsolete in American practice, having been replaced by modern unified court systems with renamed trial courts.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): A commission under which a court is empowered to hear and determine a criminal case; also, the hearing or trial conducted under such authority.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Not independently defined; treated as a legal term of art throughout the nineteenth century.
The Wiktionary definition is accurate as far as it goes, but the common rendering understates the term's institutional weight. Oyer and terminer was not merely a procedural authorization — it was the name of a distinct court in many American states, with its own docket, jurisdiction over capital matters, and formal standing separate from courts of quarter sessions or common pleas. Treating it simply as a "commission" misses the full institutional meaning that researchers will encounter in historical records.
---
Common Confusion
Oyer and terminer is sometimes conflated with gaol delivery, the companion commission that empowered judges to clear the jails by trying all prisoners held awaiting trial. The two commissions were frequently issued together and executed by the same judges sitting at the same assizes, which contributes to the conflation. They were nevertheless distinct authorizations: oyer and terminer targeted the offense (hearing and determining the crime), while gaol delivery targeted the prisoner (disposing of those already in custody). In American usage, the distinction largely collapsed, and courts of oyer and terminer assumed both functions.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working in colonial and early American legal records will encounter oyer and terminer in several distinct forms that require careful differentiation.
First, the term describes a commission, not necessarily a standing court. In colonial Massachusetts and other early jurisdictions, special courts of oyer and terminer were convened for particular emergencies — the Salem witch trials of 1692 were conducted before a specially commissioned Court of Oyer and Terminer, not a regular court. Conflating special commissions with regular criminal courts produces serious interpretive errors.
Second, in post-revolutionary American states, the institutionalization of courts of oyer and terminer varied enormously. Pennsylvania, New York, and several other states maintained formal Courts of Oyer and Terminer as part of their regular court structures for much of the nineteenth century. The names, jurisdictions, and compositions of these courts changed across constitutional revisions. A researcher must establish which version of the court existed at the date relevant to their inquiry.
Third, because the English commission and the American courts shared a name but diverged in structure, English legal authorities — including Blackstone and Stephens, both cited in the historical dictionaries — describe a system that does not map cleanly onto American practice. Burrill's citation to 4 Bl. Com. 269-270 is useful for the English background but should not be read as governing American court structure.
Fourth, the abolition of courts of oyer and terminer in various states often occurred in stages or was incomplete. Some states renamed the courts while preserving their jurisdiction; others merged them into consolidated trial courts. The term may persist in statutes or court rules after the court itself was formally abolished, creating ambiguity in records from transitional periods.
Finally, researchers should note that because oyer and terminer courts typically handled the most serious criminal cases, their records — where preserved — are among the richest sources for capital case history, grand jury practice, and the development of felony procedure in early American law.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The historical dictionaries present a consistent core account: oyer and terminer is a Norman French phrase describing the commission empowering judges to inquire, hear, and determine treasons, felonies, and misdemeanors. Burrill, Black's (both editions), and Bouvier all agree on this framing and all trace the English usage to the assize system.
Burrill is the most useful of the historical sources on the English side, citing both Blackstone and Stephens directly and preserving the detail that the commission was originally extraordinary — issued "upon sudden outrage or insurrection" — before becoming regular. Black's second edition adds that in the United States the term was applied to specific courts, though the entry breaks off at that point in the available text.
Bouvier cross-references ASSIZE and COURT OF OYER AND TERMINER without providing an independent definition, which is characteristic of Bouvier's structure for compound legal institutions; researchers should follow those cross-references.
What the historical dictionaries collectively underperform: none of them adequately distinguishes the English assize commission from the American institutionalized courts, and none accounts for the significant variation across American state systems. They treat the term as more uniform than the historical record supports. The note in Black's first edition that the commission "is now issued regularly" describes English practice of that period and should not be imported into analysis of American courts.
---
Jurisdictional Note
In England, the commission of oyer and terminer was absorbed into the reorganized assize system and eventually the Crown Court established by the Courts Act 1971; the terminology no longer appears in active English law. In the United States, the term survived longest in Pennsylvania and New York, where Courts of Oyer and Terminer persisted under that name into the twentieth century before being merged into unified trial court systems. Researchers working in other states should not assume the court existed under that name simply because the commission terminology appears in early statutes.
---