To draw bills or checks upon an individual, bank, or other corpora- tion, for a greater amount of funds than the party who draws is entitled to. When a person has overdrawn his ac- count without any intention to do so, and afterwards gives a check on a bank, the holder is required to present it, and on re- fusal of payment to give notice to the maker, in order to hold him bound for it; but when the maker has overdrawn the bank knowingly, having no funds there between the time the check is given and its presentment, the notice is not requisite; 2 N. & MC. 433; 16 Me. 36. A bank may properly refuse to pay a check which will overdraw the depositor's account, though on the bank books his balance seems to be larger than the amount of the check, be- cause a check of his, paid by the bank two days before, had not yet been charged to such depositor: 138 III. 596. The president of a bank who directs the payment of checks of a customer has no money in the bank, drawn in payment of property purchased by the customer, has no such interest in the property as will support an action by him for its conversion; 43 Mo. App. 566. An overdraft on a bank is in the nature of a loan; it is considered a fraud on the part of the depositor; 52 Pa. 206. See 10 Wall. 647. Indebitatus assumpsit will lie against the depositor to recover the over- draft; 9 Pa. 475; 46 Ill. App. 461. See, generally, 24 N. J. L. 484. A cashier who knowingly permits an overdraft is guilty of a breach of trust, and liable to an action to make good the amount, even though the directors had been wont to countenance him in a custom of allowing good depositors to overdraw; Morse, Bank., 3d ed. § 357. If an overdraft on a national bank is properly made and allowed, or even if im- properly allowed, the entry of the trans- action on the books of the bank just as it occurred is not a false entry, under R. S. §5209; 82 Fed. Rep. 904. The mere pay ment of a check which creates an over- draft is not a fraudulent misapplication of the funds; id. and where a national bank officer arranges with a depositor in good faith to give him credit beyond his deposit and makes proper entries of his overdrafts, it is not a false entry under K. S. § 5209 : 165 U. S. 323. But where the president of a bank, not acting in good faith, permitted overdrafts which he did not believe and had no reasonable ground to believe would be repaid, and it appeared that he intended by the transaction to injure and defraud the bank, the act becomes a crime; 162 U. S. 664.