Definition
A person formally placed outside the protection of the law, stripped of legal rights and remedies, and in historical English practice rendered subject to being killed without legal consequence. The term carries two distinct registers in legal usage:
1. (Historical common law) A person against whom a judgment of outlawry has been pronounced — typically following flight from criminal process or failure to appear — resulting in forfeiture of goods, loss of legal standing, and, in the earliest periods, exposure to killing by any person without penalty. The outlaw was said to be extra legem positus: placed outside the law entirely.
2. (Colloquial legal usage, American) A claim, note, or obligation that has been "outlawed" — that is, barred by the applicable statute of limitations and no longer enforceable in court. This usage appears in American decisions and is noted in Black's: "OUTLAWED, when applied to a promissory note, means barred by the statute of limitations."
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): A fugitive from the law; a criminal excluded from normal legal rights; more loosely, a person who operates outside established norms; also, a wild or violent animal.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "A person excluded from the benefit of the law, or deprived of its protection."
The common meaning tracks the historical legal meaning closely in its core — someone cast outside the law's protection. The gap worth noting is directional: in strict legal history, the outlaw loses the law's protection and simultaneously loses the right to invoke it. Modern common usage collapses this into the simpler image of a fugitive or criminal, losing the precise reciprocal quality. The colloquial American legal usage — "outlawed" meaning time-barred — has no counterpart in ordinary English and is the most likely source of research confusion.
---
Common Confusion
Two distinct uses of "outlaw" and "outlawed" appear in American legal sources and are routinely conflated:
The formal status of outlaw (a judgment of outlawry, a creature of English common law and procedure) is categorically different from a debt or note being "outlawed" (barred by limitations). The first is a personal legal disability imposed by judicial process; the second is a consequence of the passage of time under a limitations statute. Researchers encountering "outlawed note" or "outlawed debt" in 19th-century American case reports should not read these as references to criminal procedure or outlawry judgments. The usage is purely civil and means only that the limitations period has run.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working in the Law Mind corpus will encounter "outlaw" in at least three distinct documentary contexts, and conflating them produces serious misreadings:
First, English common law treatises and Year Books use outlaw in its full technical sense — a formal legal status produced by a judgment of outlawry following failure to appear, carrying consequences including caput lupinum (wolf's head), forfeiture, and civil death. Burrill and Rapalje both point toward this lineage. Corpus materials citing Coke, Bracton, or Blackstone will use the term this way.
Second, 19th-century American state court opinions — especially those involving promissory notes, debts, and contract enforcement — use "outlawed" as a shorthand for time-barred. This usage is particularly common in New England and Mid-Atlantic reporters. Black's cites Drew v. Drew, 37 Me. 389 as the reference point. Researchers should flag this usage and not import English outlawry doctrine when reading it.
Third, some American statutes used "outlaw" in a loosened, non-technical sense to describe violent actors outside civil order. Bouvier flags exactly this in the Alabama act of December 28, 1868, noting that the legislature used "outlaw" not in the strict common-law sense but in a "loose sense" — a drafting choice with real interpretive consequences.
The historical arc matters: English outlawry was a formal process with procedural steps, degrees (civil vs. criminal), and recognized consequences. By the time American courts are citing it, much of that formal structure had either lapsed or been absorbed into other doctrines. Do not assume continuity between English outlawry procedure and American usage of the word.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
The shelf sources broadly agree on the core definition — one placed outside the law's protection — but diverge in their treatment of the term's severity and evolution.
Burrill provides the richest historical texture, noting that in ancient usage the outlaw was called "wulfesheofod" (wolf's head) and "frendlesman" (friendless man), liable to be killed like a wild beast. He then flags the critical qualification: "In modern law, the word has a much less intense meaning" — though his entry is truncated in the available extract. This evolution from capital exposure to lesser disability is the central story of the term.
Rapalje & Lawrence preserves an important historical passage tracing when outlawry's scope narrowed: in King Alfred's time and through early post-Conquest England, outlawry applied only to felonies carrying the death penalty; by Edward III's reign, judges resolved to constrain outlawry's application to avoid "inhumanity and effusion" — a recognition that the doctrine's harshness required containment.
Bouvier is notable for its practical American gloss on the Alabama statute, demonstrating that by the late 19th century even American legislatures using the word did not necessarily intend its technical common-law meaning.
Black's (both editions) is comparatively spare on the historical dimensions but uniquely useful for flagging the "outlawed promissory note" usage — the most likely form in which American researchers will encounter the term in civil records.
Anderson's Dictionary of Law, in the available extract, does not address "outlaw" directly — the extract appears to be from a neighboring entry.
What the historical dictionaries collectively miss: none fully addresses the procedural mechanics of outlawry as a process (the stages of exigent, proclamation, and judgment), which a researcher would need to consult Blackstone's Commentaries (Book 4, Ch. 28) or Bacon's Abridgement directly to reconstruct.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Formal outlawry as a legal status was an English common-law institution never fully transplanted into American law. Most American states abolished or never adopted outlawry proceedings; the concept survives in American legal language primarily in the attenuated sense of "time-barred" rather than as a live procedural status. English law retained outlawry in criminal procedure longer; it was not formally abolished there until the Forfeiture Act 1870 and related reforms.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
See Law Mind Encyclopedia — Outlawry (formal process, consequences, and abolition); Statute of Limitations (for the "outlawed debt" usage); Caput Lupinum (wolf's head doctrine and its relationship to outlaw status).
---