Definition
A liberty or privilege of feudal English common law by which a lord was empowered to bring before his own manorial court any person dwelling within his manor who had been apprehended for felony at a location outside his fee. In other words, the privilege extended the lord's judicial reach beyond the physical boundaries of his land to claim jurisdiction over his tenants even when the crime and arrest occurred elsewhere. The right was a significant mark of high jurisdictional authority, distinguishing lords who held it from those whose courts could only hear matters arising within their own fee.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): An alternative form of "outfangthief"; a thief taken from without or abroad, or the privilege of trying such a thief.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "A thief from without or abroad, taken within a lord's fee or liberty. The privilege of trying such a thief."
The common usage treats outfangthef as referring to either the thief himself or the privilege of trying him — a dual usage centered on the offender. The legal meaning is narrower and more precise: it names exclusively the lord's jurisdictional privilege, not the person apprehended. Researchers should note this distinction when reading historical texts where the word may describe a defendant rather than a right.
---
Common Confusion
Outfangthef is the counterpart to INFANGTHEF, and the two are frequently cited together or conflated. Infangthef was the more common and less prestigious privilege — the right to try a thief caught within the lord's own fee. Outfangthef was the broader, rarer privilege, extending jurisdiction to tenants caught outside the fee. A lord possessing only infangthef could not pursue the jurisdictional claim that outfangthef conferred. Historical sources sometimes use the terms loosely or pair them without clearly distinguishing which right is being conveyed in a given grant.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Outfangthef is an archaic term that appears almost exclusively in materials predating the seventeenth century — royal charters, feudal grants, treatises on manorial law, and glossaries of Anglo-Saxon and Norman legal terminology. Researchers will encounter it primarily when working through the history of private jurisdiction, the franchise system of medieval England, or the development of the common law's displacement of manorial courts.
Several navigational points bear attention:
First, the term's spelling is highly variable across historical sources. Outfangthef, outfangthief, utfangenthef, and utfangtheof all appear in the record. When searching digitized primary sources, running multiple spelling variants is essential.
Second, the right was conferred by royal grant, not assumed. Its presence in a charter signals elevated jurisdictional status and may indicate the document is a significant grant of franchise or liberty. When dating or interpreting a charter, the presence of outfangthef alongside infangthef suggests a high-privilege grant rather than a routine manorial instrument.
Third, outfangthef had effectively disappeared as a living legal concept well before Blackstone's era. Its treatment in later common law dictionaries is historical and antiquarian rather than doctrinal. Researchers should not expect to find it operative in case law after the consolidation of royal criminal jurisdiction in the medieval period.
Fourth, the corpus connection to Du Cange's Glossarium — cited in all three source dictionaries — is a reminder that the primary scholarly apparatus for this term lies in medieval Latin lexicography, not English legal reports. Researchers tracing the term into continental or ecclesiastical sources may need to move beyond common law dictionaries entirely.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's (1st and 2nd editions) and Bouvier's are in close agreement, all three tracking the same core definition and all citing Du Cange as authority. The identity of language between the two Black's editions suggests no substantive evolution occurred in legal understanding of the term between those publications — it was already historical by the time either edition was compiled.
Bouvier adds the cross-reference to INFANGTHEF, which Black's omits. That cross-reference is the more useful editorial note for a researcher, since understanding outfangthef in isolation loses most of its meaning. The complementary relationship between the two privileges is the doctrinal point; Bouvier captures this more explicitly.
Webster's 1913 cites Burrill — a reference to Alexander M. Burrill's A New Law Dictionary and Glossary (1850–1851) — and frames the term from the perspective of the thief rather than the lord's right. This reflects the common-language drift noted above.
None of the historical dictionary sources address the mechanics of how the privilege was exercised in practice — how a lord would assert the claim, what procedural form removal to his court took, or how conflicts between the lord's claimed jurisdiction and royal courts were resolved. For those questions, researchers must look beyond the dictionary sources to histories of manorial jurisdiction and the Year Books.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Outfangthef is a feature of English feudal law and has no independent existence in Scottish, Irish, or colonial American legal systems, though analogous franchise jurisdictions appear in some Scottish sources under different terminology. The concept is irrelevant to modern common law jurisdictions as a live doctrine.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Law Mind Encyclopedia — Feudal Jurisdiction
Law Mind Encyclopedia — Manorial Courts
Law Mind Encyclopedia — Infangthef
---