Definition
The Ordonnance de la Marine (also rendered Ordonnance de la Marine de 1681) is a comprehensive French royal ordinance regulating maritime commerce and navigation, promulgated under King Louis XIV in 1681. It was drafted under the direction of Jean-Baptiste Colbert and represents one of the earliest systematic codifications of maritime law in Western legal history.
The Ordonnance addressed the full range of maritime legal subjects: the governance of ports and harbors, the duties of maritime officers, the registration and ownership of vessels, bills of lading, charter parties, marine insurance, bottomry, freight, and the rights and duties of seamen. It also addressed matters of prize, shipwreck, and salvage.
The Ordonnance was not merely a domestic French regulation. Because France was a dominant maritime and commercial power in the late seventeenth century, the Ordonnance exerted enormous influence across European and Atlantic legal systems. It became a foundational reference for the development of maritime law in Louisiana, Quebec, and other civil law jurisdictions with French colonial heritage, and its principles circulated widely in both civilian and common law maritime courts through treatise literature.
---
Common Confusion
The Ordonnance de la Marine is frequently confused with two related bodies of French law: the Roles d'Oléron, a much earlier medieval collection of maritime customs, and the Ordonnance du Commerce of 1673 (sometimes called the Code Savary), which addressed commercial law more broadly. The 1681 Ordonnance is specifically and exclusively maritime in scope. It should also be distinguished from the later Napoleonic Code de Commerce (1807), which ultimately superseded it in French law, though the 1681 Ordonnance influenced the maritime chapters of that later code.
---
Why It Matters in Research
Researchers working in early American maritime law, Louisiana civil law, or the history of commercial law will encounter the Ordonnance de la Marine as a persistent background authority. Several research traps deserve attention.
First, citation practices in historical sources are inconsistent. The Ordonnance is variously cited as the "Marine Ordinance of 1681," "Ordonnance de la Marine," "French Marine Ordinance," or simply attributed to "Colbert's Code." Bouvier's, for example, gives only the most compressed reference. Searching any single form of the name may miss relevant material.
Second, the Ordonnance remained operative in Louisiana long after French political authority ended. Louisiana courts and practitioners in the antebellum period cited it as persuasive or even authoritative on maritime questions not resolved by American federal admiralty law. Researchers analyzing nineteenth-century Louisiana commercial and admiralty decisions should treat it as a live source, not merely a historical curiosity.
Third, the Ordonnance is a critical source for understanding how marine insurance law developed. Many of the insurance provisions absorbed into later civil and common law systems trace directly to its text. Treatise writers including Valin (Nouveau Commentaire sur l'Ordonnance de la Marine, 1760) and later Emerigon drew heavily from it. These treatises were themselves cited in American admiralty courts, creating a chain of authority that runs through the Ordonnance even when the Ordonnance itself is not named.
Fourth, researchers should note that Bouvier's cross-references this entry to "CODE," signaling that Bouvier treated the Ordonnance as part of a broader tradition of systematic legal codification. That framing reflects the nineteenth-century civilian understanding of the Ordonnance as a proto-code rather than a collection of ad hoc regulations — a distinction that matters when assessing its interpretive authority in historical sources.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier's Law Dictionary provides only a minimal entry, identifying the Ordonnance as "a code of maritime law enacted in the reign of Louis [XIV]" and directing the reader to the entry for CODE. This compression is characteristic of Bouvier's treatment of civil law sources generally: they are acknowledged as foundational without being analyzed in depth.
The brevity of Bouvier's entry should not be taken as reflecting the Ordonnance's actual significance. By the time Bouvier was writing in the mid-nineteenth century, the Ordonnance's influence was felt primarily through intermediary sources — Valin's commentary, Emerigon's treatise on marine insurance, Pothier's works on maritime contracts, and Pardessus's commercial law compilations — rather than through direct citation. Researchers who rely solely on dictionary sources will underestimate the Ordonnance's reach into American legal practice.
No other historical dictionary in the current Law Mind corpus provides a separate entry for this term.
---
Jurisdictional Note
The Ordonnance de la Marine has no operative force in any contemporary jurisdiction. Its legal relevance today is historical and interpretive: understanding the source of doctrines that were absorbed into American admiralty law, Louisiana civil law, and the maritime law of other former French colonial territories. Researchers should treat it as a primary historical source requiring access to French-language editions or reliable translated commentary.
---