Definition
An ocrier is a court officer whose function is to make public proclamations and announcements in a judicial proceeding. The role is essentially that of a formal herald within the courtroom, responsible for communicating the court's proceedings to those present. Duties include announcing the opening and adjournment of court, calling the names of jurors, witnesses, and parties, announcing the swearing of witnesses, proclaiming silence when directed, and announcing the admission of new attorneys to the bar.
The term is closely related to — and largely superseded by — the more familiar title of crier or court crier.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): Not entered as a standard modern English term; effectively obsolete outside historical legal contexts.
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): Not entered independently; the root "crier" is defined as one who cries or makes public announcements, including town criers and court criers.
The "oc-" prefix reflects an archaic Norman French construction (from the French "huissier" tradition of court officers), distinguishing the formal court-proclamation function from the ordinary English sense of someone who simply cries out. A researcher encountering "ocrier" in an older legal text should not read it as merely descriptive of any announcing official — it denotes a specifically recognized court officer with defined duties.
---
Common Confusion
OCRIER vs. CRIER: These terms describe the same functional role. "Crier" became the dominant English form; "ocrier" appears primarily in older legal texts and dictionaries carrying Norman-influenced legal terminology. Researchers should treat both as referring to the same office. Confusion arises when indexing systems or digests use one term but not the other to classify materials about the same officer.
OCRIER vs. BAILIFF: Modern courtrooms have largely merged or redistributed the ocrier's duties among bailiffs and court clerks. A bailiff today may perform proclamation functions once assigned to the ocrier, but the two were historically distinct offices. Do not assume that sources describing a bailiff's duties fully capture what an ocrier did in earlier practice.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The term "ocrier" is a research trap precisely because of its obsolescence. It appears with some regularity in early American and English legal materials — court rules, procedural manuals, and treatises on judicial administration — but drops out of use well before the twentieth century. A researcher working in nineteenth-century sources may encounter the term without recognizing it as a variant of "crier," leading to a false impression that the document describes a different or unfamiliar officer.
Because indexing in historical legal digests was inconsistent, materials about the ocrier's role in courtroom procedure may be catalogued under "crier," "court officers," "proclamation," or not indexed by officer title at all. Cross-searching all of these terms is necessary for comprehensive historical research on courtroom procedure and officer duties.
The ocrier's function of announcing bar admissions is a particularly useful detail for researchers tracing the history of bar admission procedures and the ceremonial formalities of the early American bar. Similarly, the duty to call jurors connects this office to the history of jury selection procedure.
No meaningful jurisdictional variation is worth tracking for this term — the role was generic to common law courts and the title itself was not adopted into American statutory or constitutional frameworks as a term of art.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) provides the primary surviving legal definition, describing the ocrier as a court officer whose principal duties encompass announcing the court's opening and adjournment, calling jurors, witnesses, and parties, announcing the swearing of witnesses, proclaiming silence, and announcing bar admissions. The Black's entry trails off mid-sentence in surviving reproductions, suggesting the full enumeration of duties was longer than what is preserved in some editions.
No other shelf-standard historical legal dictionary enters the term independently with meaningful divergence from Black's treatment. The absence of the term from later editions of Black's and from Bouvier's Law Dictionary is itself informative: the title fell out of formal legal usage early enough that twentieth-century revision editors did not consider it worth retaining as an active entry. This makes Black's 2nd Ed. the anchor source for any definitional work on this term.
---