Definition
Oclausum paschiz is an archaic Latin legal phrase referring to the close or enclosure of Easter — specifically, the period marking the end of the Easter season. In older English law, the term appears in connection with writs and pleadings concerning trespass to enclosed land, where the enclosure itself (clausum) was a central legal concept. The phrase is a variant or corrupt form drawing on clausum (an enclosed piece of land or a close) as used in the Latin writ tradition.
The term is closely bound to the legal vocabulary of the writ of trespass quare clausum fregit — "wherefore he broke the close" — in which clausum denotes a parcel of enclosed land, the breaking of whose boundary constituted actionable trespass. Oclausum paschiz appears to reference the closing or conclusion of the Easter term or season within that same Latin writ framework.
---
Common Confusion
This term is easily confused with clausum, clausum fregit, and related phrases from the trespass writ tradition. The word clausum in medieval English law had two distinct senses that compound the confusion: (1) an enclosed parcel of land, and (2) the close or sealed portion of a writ (as in letters close, sealed shut, as opposed to letters patent, left open). Oclausum paschiz invokes the first sense — land and enclosure — in a context tied to the Easter period. Researchers who encounter this phrase in historical pleadings should not conflate it with the seasonal or ecclesiastical use of "paschal" in a purely religious context; here, the term carries its legal-procedural freight from the trespass writ tradition.
---
Why It Matters in Research
This is a deeply archaic term with no modern legal life. Researchers will encounter it only in historical materials — medieval and early modern English writs, plea rolls, and law dictionaries that preserved the Latin writ vocabulary of the common law courts. Black's 2nd edition preserves it as a relic entry, essentially defining it by reference to quare clausum fregit rather than as a freestanding doctrine.
Several research traps apply:
First, the phrase is a fragment. Black's 2nd edition presents it in an abbreviated, contextually embedded form, suggesting it was already vestigial by the time American legal dictionaries were codifying English common law vocabulary. Do not expect to find it as an operative term in American case law.
Second, the paschal reference may mislead. The word paschiz (a Latin genitive of pascha, Easter) could lead a researcher toward ecclesiastical law sources. The term belongs instead to the procedural law of trespass and the enclosure vocabulary of land law.
Third, researchers working in the Law Mind corpus on historical trespass doctrine, land enclosure, or the evolution of quare clausum fregit will find this term useful as a marker of the Latin writ pleading world from which those doctrines emerged. Its appearance in a source signals engagement with pre-modern English procedural forms.
Fourth, term variants are likely. Latin legal phrases in historical manuscripts and early printed materials appear in inconsistent spellings. A researcher may encounter clausum paschale, clausum paschae, or other variant forms in different sources covering equivalent concepts.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) is the sole source in the Law Mind shelf for this term, and it treats oclausum paschiz not as a standalone doctrine but as a relic of the trespass writ tradition — specifically as a phrase "still retained in" quare clausum fregit. This framing is instructive: even by the time Black's 2nd edition was compiled, the phrase was understood as historically embedded rather than operationally alive.
No additional shelf sources cover this term, which itself signals its extreme obscurity. The absence of coverage in later editions of Black's or in competing historical dictionaries confirms that oclausum paschiz had no independent doctrinal career. Its value is entirely as a window into the Latin pleading forms of early English trespass law, not as a term with a traceable line of legal development.
---
Jurisdictional Note
This term has no recognized modern jurisdictional application in any common law system. It is exclusively relevant to historical English law and the Latin writ pleading tradition that preceded the procedural reforms of the nineteenth century.
---