OASE

2 definitions found across Law Mind sources

OASEAuthored
The Law Mind • 574 words
Definition
OASE appears to be a fragmentary or corrupted entry in the available source material. The Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) text provided does not contain a substantive definition for "OASE" itself; instead, the extracted text captures a passage concerning the meaning of "case" or "controversy" in the judicial sense — likely the tail end of an adjacent entry that was mis-indexed or OCR-corrupted during digitization. As a standalone legal term, OASE has no recognized meaning in the English common law tradition, American statutory law, or standard legal usage. It does not appear in authoritative secondary sources, treatises, or judicial opinions as a term of art. If the intended term is CASE (the adjacent entry from which this text almost certainly derives), the relevant content concerns the constitutional and judicial meaning of a "case or controversy" — the foundational requirement under Article III of the U.S. Constitution limiting federal judicial power to live disputes capable of resolution through the exercise of judicial authority.
Common Confusion
OASE should not be treated as a variant spelling, archaic form, or foreign legal term. It is not the German word "Oase" (meaning oasis) applied in any legal context, nor a term from civil law, canon law, or Scottish practice. The appearance of this headword in the corpus is attributable entirely to source digitization error.
Why It Matters in Research
This entry is a research artifact, not a legal concept. Researchers encountering "OASE" in the Law Mind corpus should treat it as an indexing or OCR error, most likely a misread of "CASE" from a damaged or poorly scanned page of Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.). The "O" is almost certainly a misrendered "C" — a common optical character recognition failure when scanning aged typefaces. The substantive legal content attached to this entry — defining when a claim "takes such a form that the judicial power is capable of acting upon it" — belongs properly under CASE or CASE OR CONTROVERSY. Researchers interested in the Article III justiciability doctrine, the scope of federal judicial power, or the historical development of the case-or-controversy requirement should redirect their search accordingly. When working with historical dictionary scans in the Law Mind corpus, this entry illustrates a broader caution: headword corruption can cause genuine legal content to be filed under nonsense terms. If research turns up an unexpected or unrecognized term, check adjacent alphabetical entries and consider whether OCR error may have displaced the content from its true headword.
Historical Dictionary Support
The fragment preserved under this entry is drawn from the Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) discussion of "case" in its constitutional sense. The passage references Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brimson, 154 U.S. 447 (1894), and Smith v. Adams, 130 U.S. 167 (1889) — both genuine Supreme Court decisions addressing the scope of federal judicial power and the requirement that a dispute be of a justiciable character before courts may act. The truncated citation "In re Ra—" likely refers to In re Rahrer, 140 U.S. 545 (1891), though the text is cut off before confirmation. These citations are consistent with late nineteenth-century Black's usage, which frequently illustrated abstract procedural definitions with Supreme Court authority. The passage reflects the period's effort to give doctrinal precision to the phrase "case or controversy," distinguishing true judicial business from advisory opinions or hypothetical questions.
Related Terms
CASE CASE OR CONTROVERSY JUSTICIABILITY JUDICIAL POWER CONTROVERSY ADVISORY OPINION RIPENESS MOOTNESS STANDING
OASEmain
Black's Law Dictionary (2nd Ed.) • 1910
tion or enforcement of rights, or the prevention, redress, or punishment of wrongs; and whenever the claim or contention of a party takes such a form that the judicial power is capable of acting upon it, it has become a case or controversy. Interstate Commerce Com’n v. Brimson, 154 U. S. 447, 14 Sup. Ct. 1125, 38 L. Ed. 1047; Smith v. Adams, 130 U. ‘SS. 167, 9 Sup. Ct. 566, 32 L. Ed. 895; In re Railway Com’n (C. C.) 32 Fed. 255. But these two terms are to be distinguished; for there may be ‘a “separable controversy” within a “case,” which may be removed from a state court to a federal court, though the case as a whole is not removable. Snow vy. Smith (C. C.) 88 Fed. 658. 2. A statement of the facts involved in a transaction or series of transactions, drawn up in writing in a technical form, for submission to a court or judge for decision or opinion. Under this meaning of the term are included a “case made” for u motion for new trial, a “case reserved” on the trial of a cause, an “agreed case” for decision without trial, etc. —Case agreed on. A formai written enumeration of the facts in a case, assented to by both parties as correct and complete, and submitted to the court by their agreement, in order that a decision may be rendered without a trial, upon the court’s conclusions of law upon the facts as stated.—Case for motion. In English divorce and probate practice, when a party desires to make a motion, he must file, among other papers, a case for motion, containing an abstract of the proceedings in the suit or action, a statement of the circumstances on which the motion is founded, and the prayer, or nature of the decree or order desired. Browne, Div. 251; Browne, Prob. Pr. 295.—Case on appeal. In American practice. Before the argument in the appellate court of a case brought there for review, the ch igre counse] prepares a document or brief, bearing this name, for the information of the court, detailing the testimony and the proceedings below. In English practice. The “case on appeal” is a printed statement prepared by each of the parties to an appeal to the house of lords or the privy council, sétting out methodically the facts which make up his case, with appropriate references to the evidence printed in the “appendix.” The term also denotes a written statement, prepared. and transmitted by an inferior court or judge raising a question of law for the opinion of a superior court.—Case reserved. A statement in writing of the facts proved on the trial of a cause, drawn up and settled by the attorneys and counsel for the respective parties under the supervision of the judge, for the purpose of having certain points of law, which arose at the trial and could not then be satisfactorily decided, determined upon ful] argument before the court in banc. his is otherwise called a “special case;” and it is usual for the parties, where the law of the case is doubtful, to agree that the jury shall find a general verdict for the plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the court upon such a case to be made, instead of obtaining from the jury a special verdict. 3 BI. Comm. 378; 3 thas Comm. 621; Steph. PI. 92, 98; 1 Burrill, Pr. 242, 463.—Case stated. In practice. An agreement in writing, between a plaintiff and defendant, that the facts in dispute between them are as therein agreed upon and set forth. Diehl v. Ihrie, 3 Whart. (Pa.) 143. <A case agreed upon.—Case to move for new trial. [n practice. A case prepared by the party agninst whom a verdict has been given, upon which to move the court to set aside the verdict and grant a new trial. 3. A form of action which lies to recover damages for injuries for which the more an-

Explore the full Law Mind legal research platform.

SubscribeEncyclopediaSign In