Definition
"Now resides" is a phrase appearing in legal instruments, pleadings, and statutes to describe the place where a person is currently and permanently domiciled or established. Courts have interpreted the phrase to import the same quality of fixedness and permanence as the phrase "usually resides" — meaning a settled, continuous habitation rather than a temporary or transient presence. The phrase operates as a term of legal precision when used in jurisdictional statements, service of process provisions, venue clauses, and domestic relations filings, where the nature of a party's residence carries legal consequences.
---
Common Language
Modern common usage (Wiktionary): "Now resides" is an ordinary phrase combining the adverb "now" (at the present time) and the verb "resides" (to dwell or have one's home in a place). In common speech it simply means "currently lives at."
Historical common usage (Webster's 1913): "Reside" — To dwell permanently or for a length of time; to have a settled abode for a time; to abide continuously; to have one's domicile or home.
The gap between common and legal meaning is subtle but consequential. In everyday use, "now resides" might be satisfied by any current living arrangement, however informal or temporary. In legal usage, courts have held that the phrase carries a requirement of permanence and fixedness — a person staying temporarily in a location does not satisfy a "now resides" clause merely by being physically present there at the relevant moment.
---
Common Confusion
"Now resides" is sometimes treated as equivalent to "is temporarily staying" or "is present" in informal drafting. This conflation can be fatal in jurisdictional pleadings or service of process contexts where permanent residence, as distinguished from mere physical presence or temporary habitation, is a threshold requirement. Separately, practitioners should not assume "now resides" is interchangeable with "domicile." Residence and domicile are related but distinct concepts: a person can reside in a place without it being their legal domicile, though courts reading "now resides" in jurisdictional instruments tend to require the kind of settled establishment that approaches domiciliary character.
---
Why It Matters in Research
The phrase "now resides" appears most often in older pleadings, divorce petitions, venue allegations, and process documents — contexts where the drafter needed to assert the jurisdictional or locational fact of a party's habitation at a specific point in time. Researchers working in historical court records should note that the phrase was a standard formula, and its presence in a document is usually a jurisdictional assertion with legal weight, not merely a descriptive statement.
The key research trap is reading "now resides" as a weak or informal phrase when encountered in historical sources. As Bouvier confirms, courts gave it the same operative force as "usually resides," meaning disputes over whether a party actually "now resided" in a location were disputes about permanent habitual residence, not momentary geography. A party challenging venue or jurisdiction on the basis of this phrase was making a substantive argument about domiciliary permanence.
For domestic relations research in particular, residency requirements for divorce jurisdiction historically turned on precisely this kind of language. Whether a petitioner "now resides" in the forum state was not answered by showing physical presence on the filing date — it required evidence of a fixed, established home. Researchers tracing the evolution of divorce jurisdiction requirements should flag every instance of this phrase and treat it as a jurisdictional term of art, not loose description.
The phrase also appears in estate and probate contexts (establishing where a decedent or beneficiary resides for venue purposes) and occasionally in tax and trust instruments. Its meaning is consistent across these contexts: fixed, current, permanent habitation.
---
Historical Dictionary Support
Bouvier's Law Dictionary provides the controlling historical gloss: "The expression 'now resides' conveys the idea of a fixed and permanent residence quite as certainly as the expression 'usually resides.'" This entry is brief but pointed. Bouvier draws on Kentucky case authority to establish that the temporal modifier "now" does not weaken the residence requirement — it does not reduce "resides" to a snapshot of physical location. The permanence implied by "resides" survives the addition of "now."
What historical dictionaries do not address is the boundary between "now resides" and domicile, or how courts handled a party who had only recently established residence in a jurisdiction and was using "now resides" to assert that new residence for venue or divorce purposes. Researchers should supplement Bouvier with primary court records and treatises on domicile and jurisdiction from the relevant period and jurisdiction.
---
Jurisdictional Note
Residency requirements and their interpretation vary by state, particularly in domestic relations law. While the general principle that "now resides" imports permanence is consistent with Bouvier's national synthesis, specific durational requirements — how long a party must have resided in a state before filing for divorce or asserting venue — are entirely creatures of state statute and vary significantly. The phrase itself does not supply a durational floor; that comes from the applicable statutory scheme.
---
Encyclopedia Cross-Reference
Divorce — Residency and Jurisdictional Requirements (The Law Mind Family Law Encyclopedia)
---