Perfect delegation exists when the debtor who makes the obligation is discharged by the creditor. Imperfect delegation exists when the creditor retains his rights against the orig- inal debtor. 2 Duvergnoy, n. 169. It results from the definition that a dele- gation is made by the concurrence of at least three parties, viz.: the party delegat- ing-that is, the ancient debtor who pro- cures another debtor in his stead; the party delegated, who enters into the obligation in the place of the ancient debtor, either to the creditor or to some other person ap- pointed by him; and the creditor, who, in consequence of the obligation contracted by the party delegated, discharges the party delegating. Sometimes there intervenes a fourth party; namely, the person indicated by the creditor in whose favor the person delegated becomes obliged, upon the indi- cation of the creditor and by the order of the person delegating. Pothier, Obl. pt. 3, c. 2, art. 6; 48 Miss. 454. See La. Civ. Code 2188, 2189: 14 Wend. 116; 20 Johns. 76;5 Ν. Η. 410; 11 S. & R. 179. The party delegated is commonly a debt- or of the person delegating, and, in order to be liberated from the obligation to him, contracts a new one with his creditor. In this case there is a novation both of the ob- ligation of the person delegating, by his giving his creditor a new debtor, and of the person delegated, by the new obligation which he contracts. Pothier, Obl. pt. 3, с. 2, art. 6, § 2. In general, where the person delegated contracts a valid obligation to the creditor, the delegant is entirely liberated, and the creditor has no recourse against him in case of the substitute's insolvency. There is an exception to this rule when it is agreed that the debtor shall at his own risk delegate.an- other person; but even in that case the cred- itor must not have omitted using proper diligence to obtain payment whilst the sub- stitute continued solvent. Pothier, Obl. pt. 3, с. 2. Delegation differs from transfer and sim- ple indication. The transfer which a cred- itor makes of his debt does not include any novation. It is the orginal debt which passes from one of the parties, who makes the transfer, to the other, who receives it, and only takes place between these two persons, without the consent of the debtor necessarily intervening. Again, when the debtor indicates to the creditor a person from whom he may receive payment of the debt, and to whom the debtor gives the cred- itor an order for the purpose, it is merely a mandate, and neither a transfer nor a nova- tion. So, where the creditor indicates a person to whom his debtor may pay the money, the debtor does not contract any obligation to the person indicated, but con- tinues the debtor of his creditor who made the indication. Pothier, Obl. pt. 3, c. 2. See NOVATION. At Common Law. The transfer of au- thority from one or more persons to one or more others.